Jump to content

ILYAS

Member
  • Posts

    84
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    21

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    ILYAS got a reaction from Waqar Saleem in Beam Fail In Torsion And Shear In Etabs Then Why Torsion Modifier Reduce To 0.001   
    justified and reasonable practice as explained above the concept of equilibrium torsion
  2. Thanks
    ILYAS got a reaction from UmarMakhzumi in Concrete Box Culvert Design on CSI bridge   
    Please solve one frame manually with these conditions ,you will understand
  3. Thanks
    ILYAS got a reaction from Ayesha in Concrete Box Culvert Design on CSI bridge   
    Please solve one frame manually with these conditions ,you will understand
  4. Like
    ILYAS reacted to Ayesha in Building Code of Pakistan   
    I didn’t say ETABS Or the name of any software. CSI makes a lot of softwares and a few of their softwares are much more advanced and technical than ETABS. 
  5. Like
    ILYAS got a reaction from Ayesha in Modeling of pile with soil behavior   
    1-Horizental (lateral stiffness) or vertical spring constant?and it will be better that you you go for point spring in case of pile rather then line spring.
    2-multiply the modulus of subgrade reaction with area of pile.
    3-divide the pile length into equal parts(to add modulus of subgrade reaction accordingly) and, assign the joint at intervals and then apply joint spring.
    4-you will get approximately not exactly bending moments/shear force depending upon the pile end condition fixity or partially fixed ,free whatever you have.
     
  6. Like
    ILYAS got a reaction from callmeismail in Does ETABS include probable moment calculation while designing for column shear, for SMRF RC structure?   
    it considers ,go to flexural design
  7. Like
    ILYAS reacted to Badar (BAZ) in Torsion Modifier in Beam   
    You have wrong reasons in mind regarding this. Read the relevant literature. Look for and grab the concepts of compatibility and equilibrium torsion in code and RCC books. Stiffness factors of 0.35 and 0.01 are not related.
  8. Like
    ILYAS reacted to Talha Rasul in Torsion Modifier in Beam   
    When I give a modifier for 0.01 to beams it means its is providing zero stiffness against torsion then these forces are transferred to which members?. Moreover in practical structures how torsion could be avoided in beams ( reinforcement detailing could do that .. ?) . Furthermore when a stiffness modifier of 0.35 is given to beams the same beams fails and needs a bigger section. So all this could not conclude that assigning zero stiffness against torsion in beams  means that no torsional forces will occur in real structure. 
     
  9. Like
    ILYAS got a reaction from Ayesha in REINFORCED COCRRETE PROTECTIVE GALLERY /SNOW SHED IN HIGHWAY   
    Anybody have literature or drawings of REINFORCED COCRRETE PROTECTIVE GALLERY /SNOW SHED IN HIGHWAY/ avalanches in highway?
  10. Like
    ILYAS got a reaction from Ayesha in Does ETABS include probable moment calculation while designing for column shear, for SMRF RC structure?   
    it considers ,go to flexural design
  11. Like
    ILYAS got a reaction from UmarMakhzumi in Does ETABS include probable moment calculation while designing for column shear, for SMRF RC structure?   
    it considers ,go to flexural design
  12. Like
    ILYAS reacted to Adnan Mahmood Dar in ETAB'S Version 2018   
    I will email them with latest code link of BPC-07 about the issue. let see how will they respond..
  13. Like
    ILYAS reacted to Badar (BAZ) in ETAB'S Version 2018   
    The way forward, as far as Equivalent Static load procedure is concerned, is to use the "User coefficient" option in ETABS definition of load patterns related to seismic forces. You will need to enter the value of "Base shear coefficient" as well the "Building height coefficient". The program will multiply the "Base shear coefficient" with the seismic weight, determined by the options you defined in the mass source, to generate the total seismic demand. It will use "Building height coefficient" to distribute the Base shear along the height of the building.
    For RS analysis, you can import user defined response spectrum.
     
  14. Like
    ILYAS reacted to UmarMakhzumi in Blast Proof Retaining Wall   
    Hi Rummaan17, 
    Great questions.
    This can happen. However, just to keep things simple you can size your section to make sure bending resistance is > than shear resistance. I know this answer is not very neat but I have been out of touch with this so don't exactly remember the details here.
     
    You might have to refresh me here about where does this come in play? 
     
    I think the example that I have provided only talks about the period calculation, not the strength. You are right. Do you have a criteria provided by the Client company to meet? There might be details there about what load combinations to use and what checks need to be done for blast loading for strength design.
     
    Could be, but I haven't done it. 
    You have got some excellent questions here. I wish I could answer you better but to be honest, blast loading is a complete criteria in itself. Normally a good starting point would be client specifications that you have to meet as they should specify they load cases, acceptance limit states under strength and serviceability and any other items that need to be considered. If you don't have a governing criteria, then the next best thing would be to get a book on the subject and follow a design example and establish the limit sates. Let me know.
    Thanks.
  15. Like
    ILYAS reacted to Mahnoor Khawaja in Blast Proof Retaining Wall   
    http://www.125books.com/inc/pt4321/pt4322/pt4323/pt4324/pt4325/data_all/books/D/Design%20of%20Blast%20Resistant%20Buildings%20in%20Petrochemical%20Facilities.pdf
  16. Like
    ILYAS reacted to callmeismail in Does ETABS include probable moment calculation while designing for column shear, for SMRF RC structure?   
    I need this information very much, whether ETABS  can design RC columns and Beams for shears coming from Plastic hinge and Usual Vertical loads, that is Ve=Vg+V(sway) for beam..... if it can, then how can i be sure it did take this into consideration, or how can i make the program take this into consideration? Thanks. Assalamu Alaikum.
  17. Like
    ILYAS reacted to Badar (BAZ) in ETABS extremely false design output   
    Check unbraced length ratios in your model.
  18. Like
    ILYAS reacted to Iftikhar Hussain in Modeling of FRPs Bar in ETABS   
    yes sir, i know about ACI 1R 440 for designing FRP reinforced flexural members, According to ACI frp is still not approved for compression member due to its anisotropic behaviour. Canadian Code for FRP i think provide complete design guidlins.
  19. Like
    ILYAS reacted to Iftikhar Hussain in Modeling of FRPs Bar in ETABS   
    Would it be possible to model concrete member reinforced with FRPs bars (i.e. GFRP, CFRP OR BFRP)? and also guide could we import "section model" or " FRP model" file(matlab )  TO ETABS for analysis? 
    i have read somewhere on CSI Web that the only option is its equivalent modeling in such way that extra steel bars used in beam to  model the glass fiber as a replacemt of FRP  to incresea the beam strength? is it possible to do so.
     
     
    S
  20. Like
    ILYAS got a reaction from UmarMakhzumi in Load Bearing Structure   
    ACI 332
  21. Like
    ILYAS got a reaction from Fatima Khalid in Load Bearing Structure   
    ACI 332
  22. Like
    ILYAS got a reaction from Zain Saeed in Load Bearing Structure   
    ACI 332
  23. Like
    ILYAS reacted to UmarMakhzumi in Moment Capacity of retrofitted section   
    Fatima,
    What has been stated above by Baz is very useful and you can use it for composite sections of any given configuration.  Generally speaking, strength contributions by steel angles are very low and wouldn't add much to a concrete column section. I have used angles at corner of concrete section to allow welding of lighter items (like small pipes or cable trays) or to protect the corner from deterioration. I would suggest to ignore angles and don't rely on them.
    Now lets say you still want to consider the angles, for that case follow what Baz has said. So you can model a composite section or manually calculate the moment of inertia of combined section. By doing that, you can run analysis model and get your moments in the composite member due to the applied loads. Additional checks to do would be to make sure the bolts connecting the angles to the concrete don't fail before your angle attains yield strength. You can calculate the force in the bolts by using the Shear flow formula VQ/I. You will need to check different sections along the length as moment is changing constantly along the length. I hope this helps.
    Thanks.
  24. Like
    ILYAS reacted to Fatima Khalid in Moment Capacity of retrofitted section   
    Asalamualaikum
    I use manual method or Response2000 to find yield moment capacity of RC sections. In case, if I have a section 12”x12” having 4-#6 bars... i can easily calculate the capacity.. but if this section is retrofitted with steel L4”x4”x3/8” member at all four corners then how can I calculate the moment capacity? (see attached picture, the bold corners showing L shape steel members)
    Thank you

  25. Like
    ILYAS reacted to Ayesha in Career Guidance   
    1) Self Study.
    2) Ability to visualize what is on a 2-D Drawing.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.