Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'Connection design'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • General
    • Member Introduction
    • Shout Box
    • Students Zone
    • Engineering Marvels & Disasters
  • Civil/ Structural Engineering
    • General Discussion
    • Steel Design
    • Concrete Design
    • Seismic Design
    • Foundation Design
    • Software Issues
    • Journal/ Articles/ Tutorials
    • Spreadsheets & Softwares
  • Technical Support
    • Website Announcements/ Problems/ Login/ Registration Issues
  • PSX Stocks Investing's Topics
  • Parenting's Topics
  • Construction Consulting's Industrial Construction Project
  • Construction Consulting's Piling

Calendars

  • Community Calendar
  • Construction Consulting's Piling

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


Website URL


Skype


Location


University


Employer


Interests

Found 6 results

  1. Hi! Is there any way to design this type of Beam-Girder connection? The bottom one is the beam and the top one is the girder. There will be a pulley that will be running at the bottom of the beam that's why the beam has to be downwards. I tried Ram Commection and Idea statica but none has such connection templates. Can anyone advise me how should I design or analyze such type of connection? Thanks.
  2. hello sepakistan does anybody have an worked example/design guide on how to design an achorage of steel beam to concrete column? thanks
  3. Hello.. Is it possible to analysis and design a steel building fully with Etabs including purlin, rafter assigning? And also for connection design and baseplate, is ETABS connection menu is well enough or ok for modification and using practically? Or you experts are using any other soft for only steel connection design from etabs output? I mean I have tried TEKLA, but it seems to me only good for steel detailing, again in staadpro, there is RAM connection but I don't prefer staad pro for modeling complex and tall structures as the visual and graphics effect and also complex lengthy terms. But my seniors told me that staad pro is used and better for steel structures, for connection design etc, but I do prefer ETABS, I see there is connection design tab and procedures, but as I am new in steel learning, so can I do all things, connection, baseplate design, modify I mean as per AISC code everything change that I need in etabs for steel? Please suggest.Thanks in advance.
  4. Does anyone know a steel connection design software that designs every type of connection to BS 5950 or Eurocode 3 and can interface with SAP 2000 or CSI ETABS
  5. I am currently working on a project in which it is required to connect new platform/walkways in between two existing steel structures. The platforms are required to be connected at an elevation of about 30 to 40m. Span of most of the walkways is around 10m. I currently require some connection details/information regarding how to provide bolted connection in between new and existing steel members as welding is not allowed and only connection which can be given are to be bolted one. If some has done work/project of this nature it would be kind if you can share connection details which can be followed in the specific case scenario(New walkway/operating platforms beam connection with existing steel structure beam). PS: I would also appreciate if some one can give out box of idea of connecting these walkways at an high elevation apart from following conventional system, like I am thinking of giving cable stayed walkways etc. Best regards, Sohaib
  6. Hello, I am designing the mosque in zone 4 . The roof of the mosque is a Truss.I have following questions 1. Do truss rest on the beam ? if yes .? do i have to assign any support conditions ? or etab will selelct by default. 2. what will be the grade of steel for the truss ? yield or tensile strength. some one told me go for A 36 ( 36,58)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.