Jump to content
  • Welcome to SEFP!

    Welcome!

    Welcome to our community forums, full of great discussions about Structural Engineering. Please register to become a part of our thriving group or login if you are already registered.

High Tension Wire Tower Foundation


m_naeem_b
 Share

Recommended Posts

I want to design a foundation for high tension cable tower for seismic. Can any one have experience about it and have any related material? kindly share with me. Towers are 150 ft in hight. Also design both towers which are 400ft apart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want to design a foundation for high tension cable tower for seismic. Can any one have experience about it and have any related material? kindly share with me. Towers are 150 ft in hight. Also design both towers which are 400ft apart.

Can you please share the drawings?

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont have any drawing yet. 

 

Two towers supporting chair lift like in murree.

 

two towers are 2280 ft part , below river is flowing.

 

I have to design towers as well as the foundation of towers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Thanks for sharing the drawing in pdf format. I am writing down a design approach, and would request everyone to throw their comments and questions. Lets start by:

 

1) Design Criteria

2) Expected loads on structure

3) Possible limit states

 

1) Design Criteria

I believe that you have been working on this for some time and will be having a design criteria outlining what code do you want to design this structure on, and what material strengths do you intend to use. Please post the design criteria document here.

 

2) Expected loads on structure

  • The structure is a pair of columns, with motors installed at the top of the that push/ move the chair lift. I would recommend that each column pair would be joined and braced at different levels to provide a stiff support (how far are they ? ; present framing doesn't look to work, I would suggest a truss tower). Possible loads are:
  • Weight of motors.
  • Possible thrusts at starting and stopping of chair lifts or when faced with load shedding.
  • Weight of chair lifts and passengers (considering number of persons and chair lifts at a given time).
  • Wind load on columns.
  • Weight of cable and its reaction on columns. (Cable are eccentric from column center)

3) Possible limit states

  • Apparently, columns need to be laterally stiff enough to maintain tension in the chair lift cables. 
  • Uneven support settlement. Utilization of piles to be kept to 60% and under to avoid that. It also depends upon various factors, but I am just throwing in a bullet.
  • Maximum unsupported length of cable. You many wanna do a check on that to make sure things outside your scope don't fail. I remember, we did a problem in Theory of structures for a suspension bridge. Similar concept.
  • Overturning Check.
  • Shear failure of piles. (throwing in a bullet)
  • Anchor Bolt Failure. (from sketch it looks like anchor bolt shown are typical and not designed)
  • Frost Jacking.
  • You can use a higher importance factor as failure can be catastrophic.

Some other questions.

  • How good is the geo-technical data ?
  • Please share: what you have done till now. Also list things that you haven't designed and are using typical details.
  • Are anchor bolts designed ?
  • Are piles designed properly ? 
  • How are you calculating wind load ? what code ? are you doing any manual checks on that or just software ?
  • What is the seismic class of the site ?
  • Are there any structures near by ?
  • How high is the water table ?
  • What is the confidence level on structural steel available ? Local from a mill or properly tested sections.
  • Is the soil subjected to frost heave ? Are piles and pile cap designed for that ? Are piles concrete or steel ?
  • Do you have more drawings to share ?
  • You foundation looks inadequate ?
  • Free standing columns(present framing) would be out of proportion. I would Suggest having a Truss Tower; load path would be robust and your site construction would be easy and cheap too.

I would welcome comments and more questions. Naeem, I am looking forward to your reply.

 

Cheers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Engineers,

 

Without going into any in-depth design I have just checked roughly the steel column size required for the stability concern, i-e, the size required to keep the slenderness ratio (k l/r) within 200, it comes out to be around 36 X 36 inches X 1/2 inch thickness, which gives the slenderness ratio of 187. I am not sure about the thickness requirement at this stage because it will also be governed by the fulfillment of strength requirements, i-e, the design load-moment interaction. I believe that every code has the stability requirements (The slenderness limitation), depending upon the importance of the compression member itself, it may sometimes be less than 100 in some codes, better to check with the code upon which the design is being carried out. I took the height of column as 150 feet and assume "k" as 1.5, which may increase depends upon the boundary conditions at column top. I suggest that a truss type of column be selected and also to keep in mind the workability / Installation process while designing these columns.

 

Wish you good luck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1)Design Criteria:

I am using following code

a.      ACI

b.    LRFD

c.       ANSI

 

2)Expected Load on Structure:

·         Structure comprises of two truss tower with 2250ft apart. And 204ft level difernece. ( as shown in PDF drawing that I sent to u before.)

·         Two truss tower are connected with cable.

·         Weight of chair lift is 2000KG

·         Total number of passenger are 12.

·         Cable is eccentric. But I model cable on RISA-3D software kindly check( see attached file)

3)Possible limit states:

·         I didn’t design upper structure yet, how can answer your question about piling or foundation.

·         Seismic Zone-2B (SPC-C).

·         Site class= C

·         Wind is 120mph.

·         No any structure is near by.

·         Water table is 10ft below NGL.

·         Soil is not subjected to forest heave.

·         1st upper structure will clear , then I will design pile foundation for that tower with Machine room.

·         I just did all in software.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommendation

Following are the outputs of the preliminary design of Chair Lift project.

 

Type

3S

Drive L ocat ion

Top

Tension L ocat ion

Bot t om

Slope ( ft)

1:10.75

Horizontal al ( ft)

2250

Vert ical ( ft)

204

Speed ( m/s)

7.0

Trip Time ( minutes)

6.0

Initial Capacity y ( ppl)

12

Initial Carriers

2

Design Capacity ( ppl)

15

Design Carriers

2

Downhill L oad ( %)

100

Continuous  kW

350

Main Drive(Diesel Engine)

550 hp

Extra Drive (Diesel Engine) (For light and others)

50 KW ( 70 hp)

Auxiliary Drive

N/A

Track Rope ( mm)

56 (2.2 in)

Haul Rope ( mm)

41 (1.6 in)

Type of Carrier

12 passengers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you please make me understand the process of movement of the chair lifts. How it is controlled? Is there a single cable that starts from one tower and takes a round over the rest of towers with pulley action, i-e, the single cable becomes the part of both Up-Way movement and the Down-Way movements?  Or there are two independent movements going on, i-e, the Up-Way and the Down-Way separately? If two separate movements going on (involving the two opposie set of towers) then within each system where are those pulleys located that turn the motion of cable by 180 degrees? OR Will those pulleys be apart from both the towers? I just want to think about the transfer of lateral load of the chair lifts to the towers during motion as well as at static conditions. Of course slope is one of the factor that will generate a component of lateral load but apart from it, is there any pulley reaction transferring to the columns?

 

Regards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only two towers with three cables. But middle cable is main cable, and chair lift moves to and fro with this cable. Other two cables are supporting cables. (Like tricable gondola). Chair lift will not moves 180deg when it reaches to tower. Clint want to construct , just one plate form near towers, and chair lift will moves up again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

 

My models are attached.

 

Naeem, your model is incomplete. There are no load cases defined other than dead. Wind will govern the design for the structure. You members are almost all overstressed in basic gravity load combinations. Your should provide complete braces to the foundation so that for all lateral loads (esp wind) load path is complete and there is no bending in the framing members. I should have seen this way before but I am sorry due some unexpected work I couldnt check it. Anyhow, revise your framing. Put cross-braces or chevron bracing on all faces instead of knee braces; that will make your forces from top to bottom through tension and compression and you dont need any moment joints. Apply wind load (v.v. imp) . if you dont know how to do it let me know. I can help you for auto loading in SAP. Your model needs a lot of rework.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • Hi there,
      I am interested in performing "Performance Based Design" for a 20 story building. 
      I'll be performing "Non-Linear Static Pushover Analysis" for my model. Until now, I have decided to go with "Displacement Co-efficient method". I will be using ETABS 2017 for performing Pushover Analysis. While assigning plastic hinges, I have an option of using ASCE 41-17 (Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing buildings". I would like to know what would be a better estimate for relative distances for plastic hinges in case of beams, columns. Any input concerning assignment of hinges to beams, columns and shear walls is highly appreciated. Normally it's taken 0.05 and 0.95 or 0.1 and 0.9. What's your opinion on this?
      Secondly, it would be great if someone can recommend me a book or some good source to understand how to characterize building using performance levels. Any sort of help is appreciated.
      I have recently graduated and joined a structural design firm, so kindly guide me, considering me a beginner.

       
      • 2 replies
    • *SEFP Consistent Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Pile Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Doc No: 10-00-CD-0007*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Date: April 16, 2018*

      1.1. FUNCTION OF JOINT

      Beam-column joint must transfer the forces, such as moment, shear and torsion, transferred by the beam to the column so that the structure can maintain its integrity to carry loads for which it is designed.

      Another function of the beam-column joint is to help the structure to dissipate seismic forces so that it can behave in a ductile manner.

      1.2.WHY DO WE CARE

      During an extreme seismic event, the code-based structure is expected to maintain its load-carrying capacity for gravity loads even after the structure deforms into inelastic range so that it does not pose any life safety hazard. Hence, the joint can go through significant degradation of strength and stiffness, and if it fails in shear, or anchorage, the life-safety objective of code cannot be achieved.

      1.3.CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE


      1.4.THINGS TO CONSIDER FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      Longitudinal bars of beams, or slab, must be able to develop their yield stress, so that the beam/slab can transfer moment to joint. It means that longitudinal bars must have adequate development length for hooked bars. This implies that the size of the column must be such that bars can develop their tensile forces. If bars can transfer moment, they can also transfer shear as far as monolithic construction is concerned.


      The shear strength of the joint must enable the transfer of moment and shear through it.



      The joint should be Constructible: Congestion of reinforcement is the main concern.

      1.5.DESIGN SHEAR FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      The design shear for beam-column joint depends upon the relative strength of beam and column at the joint.

       
      • 4 replies
    • *Comments/Observations regarding modelling in ETABS*

      *Doc No: 10-00-CD-0006*

      *Date: May 06, 2017*

      Some of the observations made during extraction of results from ETABS (v 9.7.4), for design of reinforced concrete members, are being share in this article.,

      1) Minimum Eccentricity

      ETABS always considers the minimum eccentricity for selecting the design moment of columns irrespective of the probable behavior of the column, whether short or long column. See section 10.10.6.5 and its commentary of ACI 318-08 which deals with minimum eccentricity of long columns. You should always check the design moments that ETABS uses for columns if you want to bring down the cost of construction.

      2) Unbraced/ Braced Preference

      ETABS always performs analysis of frame as if it is un-braced. You should investigate if the storey under consideration is braced, or un-braced (10.10.5.2), and decide appropriate design moments of columns.

      3) Time Period

      ETABS has a tendency to select a time period of the building that is considerably less than the value obtained by the approximate method, Method A, of the section 1630.2.2  of UBC 97. To quote the FEMA 451 document: ''Because this formula is based on lower bound regression analysis of measured building response in California, it will generally result in periods that are lower (hence, more conservative for use in predicting base shear) than those computed from a more rigorous mathematical model". So, there is no need to use the value of time period that is lot less than Ta. One should always check the time period used by the software; ETABS can overestimate the seismic force by more than 2 times.

      Visit the forum link to read the complete article.
      Link: http://www.sepakistan.com/topic/2300-commentsobservations-regarding-modelling-in-etabs/
      • 0 replies
    • The minimum amount and spacing of reinforcement to be used in structural floors, roof slabs, and walls for control of temperature and shrinkage cracking is given in ACI 318 or in ACI 350R. The minimum-reinforcement percentage, which is between 0.18 and 0.20%, does not normally control cracks to within generally acceptable design limits. To control cracks to a more acceptable level, the percentage requirement needs to exceed about 0.60% (REFRENCE ACI COMMITE REPORT 224R-01)



       

       



       

       

      So according to above statement , should we follow 0.60%, to be on more safe side??



       
      • 12 replies
    • Dear Sir/Madam,

      This email is an invitation for the participation in the First South Asia Conference on Earthquake Engineering (SACEE-2019) which will be held on 21-22 February 2019 in Karachi, Pakistan. This conference is the inaugural event in this series of conferences which has been constituted under the auspices of South Asia Earthquake Network (SHAKE). The organisers of the conference include NED University, University of Porto, University of Fuzhou, University Roma Tre and Institution of Engineers Pakistan. The conference website can be visited at http://sacee.neduet.edu.pk/.

      Please note that world leading earthquake engineering experts have confirmed their participation in the conference. These include Prof Abdelkrim Aoudia (Italy), Prof Alper Ilki (Turkey), Dr Amod Mani Dixit (Nepal), Prof Bruno Briseghella (Italy), Prof George Mylonakis (UK), Prof Khalid Mosalam (USA), Prof Humberto Varum (Portugal) and many others. The presence of these distinguished experts allows you to exchange your work/issues with them and discuss possibility of any future collaboration. Please note that participation in the conference is strictly based on registration. Early registration in different categories at reduced rates are available till 10 December 2018. Please visit the conference website to see the details and the link for registration.

      If there are any queries, please do not hesitate to contact the Conference Secretary at the following address

      Prof. Muhammad Masood Rafi
      Conference Secretary- SACEE-2019
      Chairman
      Department of Earthquake Engineering
      NED University of Engineering & Technology Karachi, Pakistan.
      Phone: 0092-21-992-261261 Ext:2605
      Email: rafi-m@neduet.edu.pk
    • What is the Minimum reinforcement For Precast Pile  according to different codes (ACI,BS)??  Pile length is 40 times of pile least dimension . 
      • 1 reply
    • Dear members, I am working on a 10 storied rcc factory building with one basement,  where floor loads are in general 125 psf(Live) . but there are 2 warehouse in the building at ground floor & 10th floor where the Live load of stacked materials are 450psf. I have modeled it and analysed in ETABS. After analysis, seeing the floor displacement for seismic load,  i am in big shock to see the pattern. the displacement pattern suddenly increased hugely & then got normal . if the warehouse load created problem, then why it effected only Ground floor level, not the 10th floor! Please tell me how can i solve it. 
      • 1 reply
    • Asalamualaikum all,

      I have columns which are conflicting with the underground water tank as shown in figure.
       

      So I have decided to make underground water tank base slab as a footing for column. So I import etabs model to safe and just take uniform water load on base slab and point load from columns.

      This is the residential house. The BC is 2tsf. But SAFE is showing tension on the base slab and the thickness from punching is 30''. I believe that thickness is too high. What can be the error? Is this approach is correct for design base slab of ugwt to carry load of two edge columns?
      • 11 replies
    • SAFE perform iterative uplift analysis,any one having experience how to check the results of this analysis???what is the purpose and scope of this analysis???
      • 15 replies
    • Shear wall design
      AOA 

      i am facing problems in shear wall design .what are the pier and spandral ?what will be the difference when we assign pier or spandral? without assigning these the shear wall design is incomplete .

      i am taking about etabsv16

      someone have document about shear wall design plz provide it 

      thank you

       
      • 13 replies
  • Tell a friend

    Love Structural Engineering Forum Of Pakistan? Tell a friend!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.