Jump to content
  • Welcome to SEFP!

    Welcome!

    Welcome to our community forums, full of great discussions about Structural Engineering. Please register to become a part of our thriving group or login if you are already registered.

Steel Column Base Plate Modelling In Sap


Waqas Haider
 Share

Recommended Posts

Respected seniors,

It is my 1st post. I  have got help from this forum many times but posting 1st time.. i am a junior structural engineer..

i am to model a steel column resting at 8 ft concrete pedestal of isolated foundation...

The base of steel column is attached resting at pedestal with the help of a hinged type base plate...

but i am confused what type of constraint i shud provide at the connection of steel column base at pedestal....

i even dont know exactly what a constraint is...

i am to design foundations of column. so kindly let me know how to model it properly and accurately... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you Waseem bhai for ur reply... i am infact confuse that i have two option to design isolated footing....

 

1st way is that i model steel column with hinged connection at base. the note down its reactions in SAP and do manual calculations for the design of footing and pedestal... the reactions, noted in SAP would be imagined at the top of pedestal of footing.. then i will have to transfer this reactions from top of pedestal at the top of footing along with the moments produced due to these reactions at the top of footing by multiplying these reactions with the height of pedestal. the i can use these Fx, Fy, Fz reactions along with moments Mx, My, produced due to this transfer because reactions are acting at top of pedestal and i have transfered this to top of footing... now i can design my footing for this Fx, Fy, Fz, Mx, My either manual or using safe........

 

2nd way i have is, I can model the very same pedestal at bottom of steel column and fix the base of pedestal... in this way i can get automatically, transferred moments (Which i was transferring myself by Fx*H or Fy*H) at the top of footing...

 

But the results of both of them are not matching. And I also cant understand what type of conenction i must provide at the connection of steel column to pedestal in SAP...... Which of my way is OK out of 1 and 2?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WAIT!

 

I dont understand why you are transferring your reactions from top of footing to bototm of footing? second thing is why you said the reactions on top of footing will produce moment at the bottom of footing?

 

Now I tell you what you do!

 

1-Apply pin supports to steel columns in SAP.

2-Note down the reactions for manual design or export to SAFE..(upto you).

3-If you do manual design then just design an isolated footing on this reaction.

 

Bearing pressure = reaction/area of footing

 

check shear 

 

and design for reinforcement

 

simple!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ni bhai... At bottom of steel column,, there is not footing... there is a concrete pedestal of 8 ft height.. and footing is below this pedestal.. so the reactions obtained from SAP, will not be at top of footing.. it will be at top of pedestal... and due to this reason, i want to transfer my reactions.............. i know how to transfer loads along with accompanying moments manually i.e. by multiplying each reaction with height of pedestal... but can i model this pedestal into sap along with steel column?? if yes, then how to model it properly?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are providing hinge support for column then release your moments for column by selecting the column member. However i would suggest you to make a fixed connection, in that case you don't need to release moment moreover it is easy to make on site, in Pakistan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot is going on this thread, and I would just point out 1 thing regarding "hinge type base plate".

Your base connections can be fixed or pin.

Depends where you place your bolts around column. If bolts are insider flanges, its pin, if outside, fixed or moment. You will have to design the baseplate accordingly.

Also the connection of column to baseplate matters and you can achieve a pinned connection by welding in a special way but to keep things simple, assuming fully welded column to baseplate, stick to bolt layout to determine if its pin or fixed.

Rest, you can transfer the loads like you said. Follow free body.

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In addition to what Umar said about bolds inside or outside flanges...I would add that...

 

you can model 8 feet high concrete column just as you modelled the steel column. Add another line element made up of concrete (that is 8 feet high) directly connected to steel column. It will be a continuous (fixed) connection between 2 columns as mentioned in post#6. 

 

Then at the base of concrete column you dont really need to model pedestal in SAP. just apply a suitable support according to post #7.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

A lot is going on this thread, and I would just point out 1 thing regarding "hinge type base plate".

Your base connections can be fixed or pin.

Depends where you place your bolts around column. If bolts are insider flanges, its pin, if outside, fixed or moment. You will have to design the baseplate accordingly.

Also the connection of column to baseplate matters and you can achieve a pinned connection by welding in a special way but to keep things simple, assuming fully welded column to baseplate, stick to bolt layout to determine if its pin or fixed.

Rest, you can transfer the loads like you said. Follow free body.

Thanks.

 

Hello Umar,

 

Can you please send me any reference book or document for your quoted statement?

 

"If bolts are insider flanges, its pin, if outside, fixed or moment. You will have to design the baseplate accordingly."

 

Thanks.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no need for any reference for that statement. Its simple. Flanges will resist moment and and when there are no bolts around flanges, there will be no couple (tension, compression) to resist the moment. Only axial load will be resisted by bolts near the web.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't need a reference book for this. Do a simple thought experiment. When bolts are inside the flange, there is no rotational constraint. However, when bolts are outside the flange, load path is throught base plate bending and considering a reasonably thick baseplate(which is 99% of the times) bolts would create a couple offering rotational restraint. You need to ensure that your bolts can handle interaction of shear and tension. This is standard parctise.

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hello.. so after analyzing in SAP, for baseplate design and connection, can I do it via SAP? or manually? or should I then  use the values in another software and what? All I need is how can I easily and perfectly design steel connections and baseplate using ETABS or SAP? 

Edited by Juli
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do the connections manually, using custom made Excel worksheets. However, I use ETABS for main frame analysis & design.  You may develop steel connection design worksheets in MS Excel, a very powerful spreadsheet software, yet not very difficult for developing structural worksheets for routine design office work. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Steel column base plate connections are very important in transferring the column loads to the foundation. Often design engineers model and analyze the structure precisely using available software such as SAP2000, STAAD, ETABS, MIDAS, ... but in the design of base plate connections , they use simple methods that have not the correct calculation in comparison with the real behavior of base plates.

So, I want to introduce you, a professional software for the modeling, analysis, and design of steel column base connections that is different in comparison to the available softwares.

ColumnBase is integrated software for analysis and design of column-base connections using three-dimensional finite element modeling.
This software provides a three dimensional model of connection parts (including foundation, grout, column, base plate, stiffeners, etc.) for finite element analysis, and by applying contact modeling analysis to connection parts in simultaneous loading cases, analyzes connection model and finally applies its results according to designing handbooks and standards. Outputs of this software have been proved by the most reliable laboratory experiments, and its accuracy is incomparable.

Visual and user-friendly interface, easy to use and precise results.
Analysis results verified by several valid experimental tests and realistic simulation of base plate behavior is performed by using it.
Analysis results are used for the automatic design of connection components according to standards/codes.

It is now available for free download at http://pceesoft.com/download
View its introduction on LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/pulse/introduction-columnbase-software-amir-hasanpour

Introduction to Product: http://pceesoft.com/product

Linkedin Article: http://www.linkedin.com/pulse/introduction-columnbase-software-amir-hasanpour

View Sample Report at SlideShare:
https://www.slideshare.net/ircivil/columnbase-plate-foundation-design-report-how-to-design-base-plate-connections-sample-design-report-columnbase-software-pceesoft-inc
 

3D View Results.png

ColumnBase-v4.0.0.jpg

Edited by Amir_hp
Modify
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • Hi there,
      I am interested in performing "Performance Based Design" for a 20 story building. 
      I'll be performing "Non-Linear Static Pushover Analysis" for my model. Until now, I have decided to go with "Displacement Co-efficient method". I will be using ETABS 2017 for performing Pushover Analysis. While assigning plastic hinges, I have an option of using ASCE 41-17 (Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing buildings". I would like to know what would be a better estimate for relative distances for plastic hinges in case of beams, columns. Any input concerning assignment of hinges to beams, columns and shear walls is highly appreciated. Normally it's taken 0.05 and 0.95 or 0.1 and 0.9. What's your opinion on this?
      Secondly, it would be great if someone can recommend me a book or some good source to understand how to characterize building using performance levels. Any sort of help is appreciated.
      I have recently graduated and joined a structural design firm, so kindly guide me, considering me a beginner.

       
      • 2 replies
    • *SEFP Consistent Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Pile Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Doc No: 10-00-CD-0007*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Date: April 16, 2018*

      1.1. FUNCTION OF JOINT

      Beam-column joint must transfer the forces, such as moment, shear and torsion, transferred by the beam to the column so that the structure can maintain its integrity to carry loads for which it is designed.

      Another function of the beam-column joint is to help the structure to dissipate seismic forces so that it can behave in a ductile manner.

      1.2.WHY DO WE CARE

      During an extreme seismic event, the code-based structure is expected to maintain its load-carrying capacity for gravity loads even after the structure deforms into inelastic range so that it does not pose any life safety hazard. Hence, the joint can go through significant degradation of strength and stiffness, and if it fails in shear, or anchorage, the life-safety objective of code cannot be achieved.

      1.3.CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE


      1.4.THINGS TO CONSIDER FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      Longitudinal bars of beams, or slab, must be able to develop their yield stress, so that the beam/slab can transfer moment to joint. It means that longitudinal bars must have adequate development length for hooked bars. This implies that the size of the column must be such that bars can develop their tensile forces. If bars can transfer moment, they can also transfer shear as far as monolithic construction is concerned.


      The shear strength of the joint must enable the transfer of moment and shear through it.



      The joint should be Constructible: Congestion of reinforcement is the main concern.

      1.5.DESIGN SHEAR FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      The design shear for beam-column joint depends upon the relative strength of beam and column at the joint.

       
      • 4 replies
    • *Comments/Observations regarding modelling in ETABS*

      *Doc No: 10-00-CD-0006*

      *Date: May 06, 2017*

      Some of the observations made during extraction of results from ETABS (v 9.7.4), for design of reinforced concrete members, are being share in this article.,

      1) Minimum Eccentricity

      ETABS always considers the minimum eccentricity for selecting the design moment of columns irrespective of the probable behavior of the column, whether short or long column. See section 10.10.6.5 and its commentary of ACI 318-08 which deals with minimum eccentricity of long columns. You should always check the design moments that ETABS uses for columns if you want to bring down the cost of construction.

      2) Unbraced/ Braced Preference

      ETABS always performs analysis of frame as if it is un-braced. You should investigate if the storey under consideration is braced, or un-braced (10.10.5.2), and decide appropriate design moments of columns.

      3) Time Period

      ETABS has a tendency to select a time period of the building that is considerably less than the value obtained by the approximate method, Method A, of the section 1630.2.2  of UBC 97. To quote the FEMA 451 document: ''Because this formula is based on lower bound regression analysis of measured building response in California, it will generally result in periods that are lower (hence, more conservative for use in predicting base shear) than those computed from a more rigorous mathematical model". So, there is no need to use the value of time period that is lot less than Ta. One should always check the time period used by the software; ETABS can overestimate the seismic force by more than 2 times.

      Visit the forum link to read the complete article.
      Link: http://www.sepakistan.com/topic/2300-commentsobservations-regarding-modelling-in-etabs/
      • 0 replies
    • The minimum amount and spacing of reinforcement to be used in structural floors, roof slabs, and walls for control of temperature and shrinkage cracking is given in ACI 318 or in ACI 350R. The minimum-reinforcement percentage, which is between 0.18 and 0.20%, does not normally control cracks to within generally acceptable design limits. To control cracks to a more acceptable level, the percentage requirement needs to exceed about 0.60% (REFRENCE ACI COMMITE REPORT 224R-01)



       

       



       

       

      So according to above statement , should we follow 0.60%, to be on more safe side??



       
      • 12 replies
    • Dear Sir/Madam,

      This email is an invitation for the participation in the First South Asia Conference on Earthquake Engineering (SACEE-2019) which will be held on 21-22 February 2019 in Karachi, Pakistan. This conference is the inaugural event in this series of conferences which has been constituted under the auspices of South Asia Earthquake Network (SHAKE). The organisers of the conference include NED University, University of Porto, University of Fuzhou, University Roma Tre and Institution of Engineers Pakistan. The conference website can be visited at http://sacee.neduet.edu.pk/.

      Please note that world leading earthquake engineering experts have confirmed their participation in the conference. These include Prof Abdelkrim Aoudia (Italy), Prof Alper Ilki (Turkey), Dr Amod Mani Dixit (Nepal), Prof Bruno Briseghella (Italy), Prof George Mylonakis (UK), Prof Khalid Mosalam (USA), Prof Humberto Varum (Portugal) and many others. The presence of these distinguished experts allows you to exchange your work/issues with them and discuss possibility of any future collaboration. Please note that participation in the conference is strictly based on registration. Early registration in different categories at reduced rates are available till 10 December 2018. Please visit the conference website to see the details and the link for registration.

      If there are any queries, please do not hesitate to contact the Conference Secretary at the following address

      Prof. Muhammad Masood Rafi
      Conference Secretary- SACEE-2019
      Chairman
      Department of Earthquake Engineering
      NED University of Engineering & Technology Karachi, Pakistan.
      Phone: 0092-21-992-261261 Ext:2605
      Email: rafi-m@neduet.edu.pk
    • What is the Minimum reinforcement For Precast Pile  according to different codes (ACI,BS)??  Pile length is 40 times of pile least dimension . 
      • 1 reply
    • Dear members, I am working on a 10 storied rcc factory building with one basement,  where floor loads are in general 125 psf(Live) . but there are 2 warehouse in the building at ground floor & 10th floor where the Live load of stacked materials are 450psf. I have modeled it and analysed in ETABS. After analysis, seeing the floor displacement for seismic load,  i am in big shock to see the pattern. the displacement pattern suddenly increased hugely & then got normal . if the warehouse load created problem, then why it effected only Ground floor level, not the 10th floor! Please tell me how can i solve it. 
      • 1 reply
    • Asalamualaikum all,

      I have columns which are conflicting with the underground water tank as shown in figure.
       

      So I have decided to make underground water tank base slab as a footing for column. So I import etabs model to safe and just take uniform water load on base slab and point load from columns.

      This is the residential house. The BC is 2tsf. But SAFE is showing tension on the base slab and the thickness from punching is 30''. I believe that thickness is too high. What can be the error? Is this approach is correct for design base slab of ugwt to carry load of two edge columns?
      • 11 replies
    • SAFE perform iterative uplift analysis,any one having experience how to check the results of this analysis???what is the purpose and scope of this analysis???
      • 15 replies
    • Shear wall design
      AOA 

      i am facing problems in shear wall design .what are the pier and spandral ?what will be the difference when we assign pier or spandral? without assigning these the shear wall design is incomplete .

      i am taking about etabsv16

      someone have document about shear wall design plz provide it 

      thank you

       
      • 13 replies
  • Tell a friend

    Love Structural Engineering Forum Of Pakistan? Tell a friend!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.