Jump to content
  • Welcome to SEFP!

    Welcome!

    Welcome to our community forums, full of great discussions about Structural Engineering. Please register to become a part of our thriving group or login if you are already registered.

Design Job Or Field Job?


taimurkhalid
 Share

Recommended Posts

Assalam u alaikum,

I am a fresh civil engineering graduate. I am interested in structural engineering but I have heard that career growth in structural engineering is very slow and salaries are very less. But I want to pursue this field. Plz guide me. How is the condition of career growth in this field. What salary should I expect at the initial level, after 5 years and after 10 years?

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Taimur, some 2600 years ago Pindar said, become who you are, by knowing who you are! 

 

Structural engineering is a very challenging field and remember something Ashraf HabibUllah and ofcourse other famous people said "Go for your passion, money will come to you ultimately"

 

I would also recommend you to watch a lecture in Princeton University by Leslie Robertson, the one who worked on WTC in 60s/70s

 

To cut it short, you need to first determine, whats your passion? Money? or Structural Engineering? Design or Site?

I dont believe evaluating career growth. If you have desire to grow, you will, in any field you are interested in.

 

Even in USA with a PE license the avg salary of a structural engineer is 120$k/yr. Thats not much but a modest amount when the middle class earning as much as 400-500$k/yr. So you wont be truely RICH if you go in structural engineering. If you really want to be then go for the money (thats not bad though).

 

For middle east you can have an idea by this equation (pretty simple, factual and accurate) you salary = no. of years x 2 in dirhams or riyals (including everything housing, perks, transportation, all).

 

if you want this 2 to be 3, you have to be exceptionally well not just in structural engineering but also with your personality. Get a PE license and might be SE too.

 

And at the end, summary is if you are really passionate about structural engineering then forget about money now...I understand money is important for subsistence needs and structural engineering will offer you enough for that but not enough to be in upper class..so decide..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assalam-o-alaikum!

 

Rana has made very realistic analysis of standing of structural engineering profession, from earning point of view.

 

If you have real desire and passion for structural engineering, and you adopt it, you would insha-allah excel in that field. The same will be true even if you have greater desire & interest  to go for site supervision  field.

 

IMHO, however it will be very advantageous for you, if you could have some site supervision experience (either side by side or prior to starting structural designing), related to construction of reinforced concrete and other structures.  This site supervision experience will also help you decide which of the two (structural engineering and site supervision) fields suits you more.

 

 

Regards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I forgot to mention that you could consider minimum salary here in middle east for 0 experience to be somewhat around 6k.. After 3yrs of experience consider the above equation upto 10-15yrs. After that its politics..:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am agree with Rana waseem bhai and Uzair bhai both but i will add one thing as i am facing the same problem as u have mentioned.I joined site job after my graduation and i got one and a half year experience at site.As i am interested in designing so i am trying repeatedly but in every company i am considered to be a fresh.So I will suggest to join design consultancy if u r interested in design.U will earn money after experiece and there is not a huge difference between salaries of a designer and a site engineer.My senior brothers can advise u in a better way as they did.I just share u my experience and opinion.Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assalam-o-alaikum!

 

RASHEED!

 

Your field experience will help you in two respects:

 

1. BEFORE you are involved in structural designing:

   To understand how actual construction is carried out at site, and to visualize what problems you might face during construction in case proper structural detailing is not done/provided on construction drawings.

 

2. AFTER you have done some structural designing:

    To decide which of the two fields (site supervision and structural engineering), is suitable for you, to adopt as an engineering field in the long run

 

It is true that after one-and-a-half year field experience, you are being considered as a fresh engineer for the structural design field. But, you should not be disappointed by this. Because you are probably forgetting that your understanding of structures (because of your field experience) is much more than a competitor who has just passed out from the university. This field experience will help you learn structural design concepts, requirements and procedures much earlier than others (having no field experience), and developing you in a better structural engineer (provided you decide to carry on as a structural engineer ultimately).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My 2cents...

 

Dont go for site if you are interested in design. Once you are on site, you will get stuck there, and even if you try to come back to design you will be considered as fresh in the field as others pointed out.

 

Stick to the design, yes you need to have actual on site understanding of things, which you can learn at any stage (may be after 5 yrs of design experience)? You can learn it. But after 5 years of experience at site, you cannt come back to design. 

 

And dont worry about that first 5 years period in design office. You can have visits to the site to coorelate your design with actual site execution. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • Hi there,
      I am interested in performing "Performance Based Design" for a 20 story building. 
      I'll be performing "Non-Linear Static Pushover Analysis" for my model. Until now, I have decided to go with "Displacement Co-efficient method". I will be using ETABS 2017 for performing Pushover Analysis. While assigning plastic hinges, I have an option of using ASCE 41-17 (Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing buildings". I would like to know what would be a better estimate for relative distances for plastic hinges in case of beams, columns. Any input concerning assignment of hinges to beams, columns and shear walls is highly appreciated. Normally it's taken 0.05 and 0.95 or 0.1 and 0.9. What's your opinion on this?
      Secondly, it would be great if someone can recommend me a book or some good source to understand how to characterize building using performance levels. Any sort of help is appreciated.
      I have recently graduated and joined a structural design firm, so kindly guide me, considering me a beginner.

       
      • 2 replies
    • *SEFP Consistent Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Pile Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Doc No: 10-00-CD-0007*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Date: April 16, 2018*

      1.1. FUNCTION OF JOINT

      Beam-column joint must transfer the forces, such as moment, shear and torsion, transferred by the beam to the column so that the structure can maintain its integrity to carry loads for which it is designed.

      Another function of the beam-column joint is to help the structure to dissipate seismic forces so that it can behave in a ductile manner.

      1.2.WHY DO WE CARE

      During an extreme seismic event, the code-based structure is expected to maintain its load-carrying capacity for gravity loads even after the structure deforms into inelastic range so that it does not pose any life safety hazard. Hence, the joint can go through significant degradation of strength and stiffness, and if it fails in shear, or anchorage, the life-safety objective of code cannot be achieved.

      1.3.CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE


      1.4.THINGS TO CONSIDER FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      Longitudinal bars of beams, or slab, must be able to develop their yield stress, so that the beam/slab can transfer moment to joint. It means that longitudinal bars must have adequate development length for hooked bars. This implies that the size of the column must be such that bars can develop their tensile forces. If bars can transfer moment, they can also transfer shear as far as monolithic construction is concerned.


      The shear strength of the joint must enable the transfer of moment and shear through it.



      The joint should be Constructible: Congestion of reinforcement is the main concern.

      1.5.DESIGN SHEAR FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      The design shear for beam-column joint depends upon the relative strength of beam and column at the joint.

       
      • 4 replies
    • *Comments/Observations regarding modelling in ETABS*

      *Doc No: 10-00-CD-0006*

      *Date: May 06, 2017*

      Some of the observations made during extraction of results from ETABS (v 9.7.4), for design of reinforced concrete members, are being share in this article.,

      1) Minimum Eccentricity

      ETABS always considers the minimum eccentricity for selecting the design moment of columns irrespective of the probable behavior of the column, whether short or long column. See section 10.10.6.5 and its commentary of ACI 318-08 which deals with minimum eccentricity of long columns. You should always check the design moments that ETABS uses for columns if you want to bring down the cost of construction.

      2) Unbraced/ Braced Preference

      ETABS always performs analysis of frame as if it is un-braced. You should investigate if the storey under consideration is braced, or un-braced (10.10.5.2), and decide appropriate design moments of columns.

      3) Time Period

      ETABS has a tendency to select a time period of the building that is considerably less than the value obtained by the approximate method, Method A, of the section 1630.2.2  of UBC 97. To quote the FEMA 451 document: ''Because this formula is based on lower bound regression analysis of measured building response in California, it will generally result in periods that are lower (hence, more conservative for use in predicting base shear) than those computed from a more rigorous mathematical model". So, there is no need to use the value of time period that is lot less than Ta. One should always check the time period used by the software; ETABS can overestimate the seismic force by more than 2 times.

      Visit the forum link to read the complete article.
      Link: http://www.sepakistan.com/topic/2300-commentsobservations-regarding-modelling-in-etabs/
      • 0 replies
    • The minimum amount and spacing of reinforcement to be used in structural floors, roof slabs, and walls for control of temperature and shrinkage cracking is given in ACI 318 or in ACI 350R. The minimum-reinforcement percentage, which is between 0.18 and 0.20%, does not normally control cracks to within generally acceptable design limits. To control cracks to a more acceptable level, the percentage requirement needs to exceed about 0.60% (REFRENCE ACI COMMITE REPORT 224R-01)



       

       



       

       

      So according to above statement , should we follow 0.60%, to be on more safe side??



       
      • 12 replies
    • Dear Sir/Madam,

      This email is an invitation for the participation in the First South Asia Conference on Earthquake Engineering (SACEE-2019) which will be held on 21-22 February 2019 in Karachi, Pakistan. This conference is the inaugural event in this series of conferences which has been constituted under the auspices of South Asia Earthquake Network (SHAKE). The organisers of the conference include NED University, University of Porto, University of Fuzhou, University Roma Tre and Institution of Engineers Pakistan. The conference website can be visited at http://sacee.neduet.edu.pk/.

      Please note that world leading earthquake engineering experts have confirmed their participation in the conference. These include Prof Abdelkrim Aoudia (Italy), Prof Alper Ilki (Turkey), Dr Amod Mani Dixit (Nepal), Prof Bruno Briseghella (Italy), Prof George Mylonakis (UK), Prof Khalid Mosalam (USA), Prof Humberto Varum (Portugal) and many others. The presence of these distinguished experts allows you to exchange your work/issues with them and discuss possibility of any future collaboration. Please note that participation in the conference is strictly based on registration. Early registration in different categories at reduced rates are available till 10 December 2018. Please visit the conference website to see the details and the link for registration.

      If there are any queries, please do not hesitate to contact the Conference Secretary at the following address

      Prof. Muhammad Masood Rafi
      Conference Secretary- SACEE-2019
      Chairman
      Department of Earthquake Engineering
      NED University of Engineering & Technology Karachi, Pakistan.
      Phone: 0092-21-992-261261 Ext:2605
      Email: rafi-m@neduet.edu.pk
    • What is the Minimum reinforcement For Precast Pile  according to different codes (ACI,BS)??  Pile length is 40 times of pile least dimension . 
      • 1 reply
    • Dear members, I am working on a 10 storied rcc factory building with one basement,  where floor loads are in general 125 psf(Live) . but there are 2 warehouse in the building at ground floor & 10th floor where the Live load of stacked materials are 450psf. I have modeled it and analysed in ETABS. After analysis, seeing the floor displacement for seismic load,  i am in big shock to see the pattern. the displacement pattern suddenly increased hugely & then got normal . if the warehouse load created problem, then why it effected only Ground floor level, not the 10th floor! Please tell me how can i solve it. 
      • 1 reply
    • Asalamualaikum all,

      I have columns which are conflicting with the underground water tank as shown in figure.
       

      So I have decided to make underground water tank base slab as a footing for column. So I import etabs model to safe and just take uniform water load on base slab and point load from columns.

      This is the residential house. The BC is 2tsf. But SAFE is showing tension on the base slab and the thickness from punching is 30''. I believe that thickness is too high. What can be the error? Is this approach is correct for design base slab of ugwt to carry load of two edge columns?
      • 11 replies
    • SAFE perform iterative uplift analysis,any one having experience how to check the results of this analysis???what is the purpose and scope of this analysis???
      • 15 replies
    • Shear wall design
      AOA 

      i am facing problems in shear wall design .what are the pier and spandral ?what will be the difference when we assign pier or spandral? without assigning these the shear wall design is incomplete .

      i am taking about etabsv16

      someone have document about shear wall design plz provide it 

      thank you

       
      • 13 replies
  • Tell a friend

    Love Structural Engineering Forum Of Pakistan? Tell a friend!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.