Jump to content
  • Welcome to SEFP!

    Welcome!

    Welcome to our community forums, full of great discussions about Structural Engineering. Please register to become a part of our thriving group or login if you are already registered.

Basement Wall Design


mhdhamood
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

The reinforcement in basement wall is similar to reinforcement in slabs. So design basement wall as a slab. Model an area element resembling your basement wall with suitable edge conditions... apply back fill load and gravity UDL loads. Mess/Divide the wall. Run the model and read moment at critical locations. and Provide reinforcement for these moments. You can also read shear force. Check thickness of wall against this shear force.

 

But if your wall is very long and acts as one way cantilever slab, then you can design it as beam or slab. Basement walls are basically designed as three edge supported slabs. 

 

But in high seismic regions, i think your walls will also behave as shear walls so proper consideration should be given to seismic induced forces. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can design it as propped cantilever. The presence of top floor and foundation would enforce one way bending (Case of a square panel with two sides having stiff supports)

For areas where you don't have a top floor, you can use the information provided in the link below to design your wall as 2 way slab panel.

 

http://www.sepakistan.com/topic/16-rectangular-concrete-tanks/

 

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since the length of basement wall would likely to be much longer when compared to a conventional shear wall, lateral shear resisted / unit foot of basement wall would not be significant. Critical case for basement wall (generally speaking) should be lateral load due to earth + any increase in that lateral load due to earthquake. This load would be perpendicular to wall.

 

Also, have a look at the following topic (there are 5 threads) as you may find them interesting:

 

http://www.sepakistan.com/tags/forums/Highrise%2Bwith%2Bbasements/

 

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Shaker,

 

The better way is to model this retaining wall as vertical beam element for 1 meter width. Apply the appropriate boundary conditions such as fix at bottom and free or pin at top. Apply the soil pressure laterally and then simply take moments and shear. Shear force will be used to decide the thickness. So just use the general shear formula which we normally use for one way shear and decide the thickness.  For flexure use beam flexure formula to calculate reinforcement.

 

Dear Waqas,

 

you are right. Actually in basements the seismic shear/forces are transferred fro retaining wall to shear walls. So there will be inplane forces in the retaining wall. For flexural reinforcement you can use earth pressure but as you know there is a distribution reinforcement in the retaining wall as well. This reinforcement  will be designed for inplane forces. 

This is very simple to calculate. Assign the one side of retaining wall as one pier. Extract V2 force and the use the length of retaining wall as depth  and use one way shear formula and calculate reinforcement as in case of shear wall.

 

Thanks

 

Muneeb

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

You have to take all the forces for design of walls, axial, shear, lateral earth/water pressure. But usually walls are quite strong in compression and you can assume pinned connection of basement wall with floor. That way you design only for lateral earth/water pressure with propped-cantilever condition (fixed at base, pinned at top).

 

Model a line element in a structural software and check the moments.

 

a. For a triangular load (earth pressure) maximum moment at base will be -2WL/15 and positive moment somewhere above base will be 0.0596WL with 1/4th reaction on pinned support.

where W is the total load in KN.

 

b. For a uniform load (surcharge) max mom at base is WL²/8 and max positive moment is 9/128 WL² with 3/8th reaction going to pinned base.

where W is the load per m in Kn/m.

 

 

Then just add a and b together (superposition for linear analysis).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dear shaker,

in case you are having just concrete wall as basement and no columns in wall and the length of wall is long then your wall will bend as one way slab. in such case i prefer to model as line element of unit width. But still you need to provide proper consideration to the corner of the wall where this one way action will be restrained. 

 

But in case we are having columns with in the wall then our slab will be showing a dishing effect which depends on the stiffness of wall and columns. in this case i prefer to model the real model consisting of columns and wall so that i may see actual deformation and i will read forces from this model. because at interface of column and wall behavior will be changed than mid span.

 

I need opinion of seniors over this. Thanks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • Hi there,
      I am interested in performing "Performance Based Design" for a 20 story building. 
      I'll be performing "Non-Linear Static Pushover Analysis" for my model. Until now, I have decided to go with "Displacement Co-efficient method". I will be using ETABS 2017 for performing Pushover Analysis. While assigning plastic hinges, I have an option of using ASCE 41-17 (Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing buildings". I would like to know what would be a better estimate for relative distances for plastic hinges in case of beams, columns. Any input concerning assignment of hinges to beams, columns and shear walls is highly appreciated. Normally it's taken 0.05 and 0.95 or 0.1 and 0.9. What's your opinion on this?
      Secondly, it would be great if someone can recommend me a book or some good source to understand how to characterize building using performance levels. Any sort of help is appreciated.
      I have recently graduated and joined a structural design firm, so kindly guide me, considering me a beginner.

       
      • 2 replies
    • *SEFP Consistent Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Pile Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Doc No: 10-00-CD-0007*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Date: April 16, 2018*

      1.1. FUNCTION OF JOINT

      Beam-column joint must transfer the forces, such as moment, shear and torsion, transferred by the beam to the column so that the structure can maintain its integrity to carry loads for which it is designed.

      Another function of the beam-column joint is to help the structure to dissipate seismic forces so that it can behave in a ductile manner.

      1.2.WHY DO WE CARE

      During an extreme seismic event, the code-based structure is expected to maintain its load-carrying capacity for gravity loads even after the structure deforms into inelastic range so that it does not pose any life safety hazard. Hence, the joint can go through significant degradation of strength and stiffness, and if it fails in shear, or anchorage, the life-safety objective of code cannot be achieved.

      1.3.CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE


      1.4.THINGS TO CONSIDER FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      Longitudinal bars of beams, or slab, must be able to develop their yield stress, so that the beam/slab can transfer moment to joint. It means that longitudinal bars must have adequate development length for hooked bars. This implies that the size of the column must be such that bars can develop their tensile forces. If bars can transfer moment, they can also transfer shear as far as monolithic construction is concerned.


      The shear strength of the joint must enable the transfer of moment and shear through it.



      The joint should be Constructible: Congestion of reinforcement is the main concern.

      1.5.DESIGN SHEAR FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      The design shear for beam-column joint depends upon the relative strength of beam and column at the joint.

       
      • 4 replies
    • *Comments/Observations regarding modelling in ETABS*

      *Doc No: 10-00-CD-0006*

      *Date: May 06, 2017*

      Some of the observations made during extraction of results from ETABS (v 9.7.4), for design of reinforced concrete members, are being share in this article.,

      1) Minimum Eccentricity

      ETABS always considers the minimum eccentricity for selecting the design moment of columns irrespective of the probable behavior of the column, whether short or long column. See section 10.10.6.5 and its commentary of ACI 318-08 which deals with minimum eccentricity of long columns. You should always check the design moments that ETABS uses for columns if you want to bring down the cost of construction.

      2) Unbraced/ Braced Preference

      ETABS always performs analysis of frame as if it is un-braced. You should investigate if the storey under consideration is braced, or un-braced (10.10.5.2), and decide appropriate design moments of columns.

      3) Time Period

      ETABS has a tendency to select a time period of the building that is considerably less than the value obtained by the approximate method, Method A, of the section 1630.2.2  of UBC 97. To quote the FEMA 451 document: ''Because this formula is based on lower bound regression analysis of measured building response in California, it will generally result in periods that are lower (hence, more conservative for use in predicting base shear) than those computed from a more rigorous mathematical model". So, there is no need to use the value of time period that is lot less than Ta. One should always check the time period used by the software; ETABS can overestimate the seismic force by more than 2 times.

      Visit the forum link to read the complete article.
      Link: http://www.sepakistan.com/topic/2300-commentsobservations-regarding-modelling-in-etabs/
      • 0 replies
    • The minimum amount and spacing of reinforcement to be used in structural floors, roof slabs, and walls for control of temperature and shrinkage cracking is given in ACI 318 or in ACI 350R. The minimum-reinforcement percentage, which is between 0.18 and 0.20%, does not normally control cracks to within generally acceptable design limits. To control cracks to a more acceptable level, the percentage requirement needs to exceed about 0.60% (REFRENCE ACI COMMITE REPORT 224R-01)



       

       



       

       

      So according to above statement , should we follow 0.60%, to be on more safe side??



       
      • 12 replies
    • Dear Sir/Madam,

      This email is an invitation for the participation in the First South Asia Conference on Earthquake Engineering (SACEE-2019) which will be held on 21-22 February 2019 in Karachi, Pakistan. This conference is the inaugural event in this series of conferences which has been constituted under the auspices of South Asia Earthquake Network (SHAKE). The organisers of the conference include NED University, University of Porto, University of Fuzhou, University Roma Tre and Institution of Engineers Pakistan. The conference website can be visited at http://sacee.neduet.edu.pk/.

      Please note that world leading earthquake engineering experts have confirmed their participation in the conference. These include Prof Abdelkrim Aoudia (Italy), Prof Alper Ilki (Turkey), Dr Amod Mani Dixit (Nepal), Prof Bruno Briseghella (Italy), Prof George Mylonakis (UK), Prof Khalid Mosalam (USA), Prof Humberto Varum (Portugal) and many others. The presence of these distinguished experts allows you to exchange your work/issues with them and discuss possibility of any future collaboration. Please note that participation in the conference is strictly based on registration. Early registration in different categories at reduced rates are available till 10 December 2018. Please visit the conference website to see the details and the link for registration.

      If there are any queries, please do not hesitate to contact the Conference Secretary at the following address

      Prof. Muhammad Masood Rafi
      Conference Secretary- SACEE-2019
      Chairman
      Department of Earthquake Engineering
      NED University of Engineering & Technology Karachi, Pakistan.
      Phone: 0092-21-992-261261 Ext:2605
      Email: rafi-m@neduet.edu.pk
    • What is the Minimum reinforcement For Precast Pile  according to different codes (ACI,BS)??  Pile length is 40 times of pile least dimension . 
      • 1 reply
    • Dear members, I am working on a 10 storied rcc factory building with one basement,  where floor loads are in general 125 psf(Live) . but there are 2 warehouse in the building at ground floor & 10th floor where the Live load of stacked materials are 450psf. I have modeled it and analysed in ETABS. After analysis, seeing the floor displacement for seismic load,  i am in big shock to see the pattern. the displacement pattern suddenly increased hugely & then got normal . if the warehouse load created problem, then why it effected only Ground floor level, not the 10th floor! Please tell me how can i solve it. 
      • 1 reply
    • Asalamualaikum all,

      I have columns which are conflicting with the underground water tank as shown in figure.
       

      So I have decided to make underground water tank base slab as a footing for column. So I import etabs model to safe and just take uniform water load on base slab and point load from columns.

      This is the residential house. The BC is 2tsf. But SAFE is showing tension on the base slab and the thickness from punching is 30''. I believe that thickness is too high. What can be the error? Is this approach is correct for design base slab of ugwt to carry load of two edge columns?
      • 11 replies
    • SAFE perform iterative uplift analysis,any one having experience how to check the results of this analysis???what is the purpose and scope of this analysis???
      • 15 replies
    • Shear wall design
      AOA 

      i am facing problems in shear wall design .what are the pier and spandral ?what will be the difference when we assign pier or spandral? without assigning these the shear wall design is incomplete .

      i am taking about etabsv16

      someone have document about shear wall design plz provide it 

      thank you

       
      • 13 replies
  • Tell a friend

    Love Structural Engineering Forum Of Pakistan? Tell a friend!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.