Jump to content
  • Welcome to SEFP!

    Welcome!

    Welcome to our community forums, full of great discussions about Structural Engineering. Please register to become a part of our thriving group or login if you are already registered.

Sign in to follow this  
EngrUzair

Øresund Bridge Connecting Sweden And Denmark

Recommended Posts

Assalam-o-alaikum,

Dear Colleagues!

The Øresund bridge is an engineering marvel that connects the Danish capital of Copenhagen to the Swedish city of Malmö.

A cable-stayed bridge runs nearly 8 km (5 miles) to an artificial island where it transitions into a tunnel that runs another 4 km (2.5 miles). The award-winning double-track railway and motorway opened on July 1, 2000.

For more details refer to the following link:

http://twistedsifter.com/2015/09/oresund-bridge-turns-into-tunnel-and-connects-denmark-and-sweden/

 

oresund-bridge-tunnel-1.jpg

oresund-bridge-tunnel-2.jpg

oresund-bridge-tunnel-3.jpg

Edited by engruzair

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Our picks

    • AOA 

      i am facing problems in shear wall design .what are the pier and spandral ?what will be the difference when we assign pier or spandral? without assigning these the shear wall design is incomplete .

      i am taking about etabsv16

      someone have document about shear wall design plz provide it 

      thank you

       
      • 9 replies
    • Salam Members,

      Congratulations to Engineers, PEC has become full signatory of Washington Accord, what are the benefits to Pakistani engineers for this agreement. 

       

      Regards   

       

       
      • 3 replies
    • Please clarify the following confusions one by one:-

       

      1. If we run P-delta analysis in ETABS, then should we ignore stiffness property modifiers for beams and columns? I have heard that if we perform P-delta analysis and apply stiffness modifiers at the same time then the moment magnification process is doubled...?

       

      2. ETABS considers selenderness of a column by applying moment magnification factors. If we run P-delta analysis also, does it mean that the selenderness of column is being over-estimated? I mean once the moments are magnified in P-delta analysis process and again through moment magnification process?

       

      Please help me understand the software myth and clarify above confusions.
      • 1 reply
    • Assalam o alaikum.
      According to ACI 12.5.2,
      development length for fc' = 3000, fy=60000, for normal weight concrete and epoxy less reinforcement, The required development length comes out to be
      for #3 = 8.2 inch
      for #4 = 10.95 inch
      for #6 = 16.42 inch
      for #8 = 21.9 inch
       
      And if in my case, ACI 12.5.3 is not fulfilled, it means now i have to provide ldh as mentioned above. ldh is STRAIGHT EMBEDMENT LENGTH + RADIUS OF BEND + ONE BAR DIAMETER as shown in figure attached. Now my question is, if in my case, main reinforcement of beam is of #6 and #4, minimum column size required will be 18 inch and 12 inch respectively. Lets say by any means, i can not select #4, #3 bars and size of column where bars are to be terminated is 12 inch, how to fullfil this development length???
      • 11 replies
    • Dear all,

      I am trying to design shearwalls through ETABS with temperature load applied over shell. At various location, spandral section fails in Shear due to temperature and piers (sometime in shear, mostly in flexure).  (See Attached Image)

      Certainly all the problem in Shearwalls are due to temperature. I don't want to increase cross section of spandral or pier at some location just due to temperature load case as it will appears non-uniform with rest of the wall. 

      I have seen stiffness modifier affect distribution of forces and also rigid/semi rigid daiphragm assumption. 

       

      Can anybody guide how to properly design the shear wall with temperature load applied in ETABS or share any similar experience. Thanks in Advance.    
      • 15 replies
    • ENGINEERS;
      I WILL LOOSE MY BRAIN FROM ETABS. 
      I DECIDED TO MAKE MANUAL MESHING FROM AREA ELEMENTS BESIDE EACH OTHER AND EVERY HING WAS FINE .
      BUT AFTER DEVISION SAY 7*7 ELEMNTS FOR EVERY BIG ELEMENT AND MAKING ETABS CHECH..................THEN 500 ERROR MESSAGE THAT ALL ELEMNTS ARE CLOSE TO EACH OTHER.  WHAT ARE GOING...... SOMEONE TELL ME PLEASE...... I WILL LOST MY WORK
      • 6 replies
    • Assalam o alaikum.
      I have just designed a frame structure with SMRF. The out put of shear seams weird to me. Column reports design shear Av/s as 0.045. (Images are attached). but when i right click the member, it must show me the most critical case HIGHLIGHTED AUTOMATICALLY. But it highlights load combo 38 (auto-generated combos have been used) which reports Av/s as 0.038. And 0.045 value is at combo 32. Is their any logic behind it?? More over how to interpret this Av/s?? means 0.045 in kip-in units means what? How can i convert this into spacing?? 
      • 9 replies
    • Hello everyone, I hope all of you will be fine. In etabs when we apply Response Spectrum loading on a multistoried building with 2 basement floors. At what floor level this loading will be applied as in equivalent static seismic analysis, we can apply EQX & EQY on any floor we like as this option is available in etabs but the problem is with response spectrum and time history analysis. please if someone knows and have the experince, share it i shall be very thankful.  
      • 5 replies
    • Salaikom dear professionals,
      First of all I would like to express my sincere thanks to the initiators of this forum for establishing such an exceptional atmosphere for knowledge/experience sharing, I it is really useful, In fact since I have found the forum I am mostly online and busy reading the posts. I would also like to thank the members for their professional comments and advice.
      As my first post in this forum I would like to ask the following queries:
      1-After running the analysis and design when I check the DESIGN DATA through Display >> Show Tables >> DESIGN DATA >> Concrete Frame Output, there is no specific message in Column Summary Data and Beam Summary Data, but in Joint summary data it is showing that “Joint B/C check not done”. Does anyone has any idea? I am sharing the ETABS model for your information and easy reference.
      ETABS MODEL.zip
      2- ETABS provides greater area of steel in the upper column than the column at BASE, perhaps due to higher moment. Could someone explain why this is so? In practice should we maintain maximum steel in both stories? Or we shall follow what the software suggests?
      3- Beside considering the minimum thickness required for deflection control of Beam as per Table 9.a Chapter 9 ACI-318 , using concrete crack behavior in ETABS and checking story drift, Do we have to check the deflection of beams for the serviceability propose elsewhere in ETBAS? If yes, Could anyone explain it?
      Regards, and look forward to any explanation
      • 13 replies
    • Posting this thread to break the ice. Modelling domes is very easy in Etabs/SAP. All you need to do is to draw the curvature of the dome in elevation by a series of straight lines, but draw only the one half. Then using the apex at centre point, radially extrude the line say 24 times at 15 degree intervals (or 48 times at 7.5 deg intervals. This feature is under Edit> Extrude Lines to areas. You can further use this geometry for Finite Element Analaysis.
      • 22 replies
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By UmarMakhzumi
      Hello Everyone,
      Saw this on FB today. Thought would post. What do you think went wrong?
      Thanks.
       

    • By rummaan17
      Dear All, 
      I have designed the bridge between two building. Fixed at one end and roller at the other. The bridge at the roller end, rests on a concrete ledge. I have provided the expansion joint based on the formulation of ASCE for building separation. I have certain queries on it :
      1- Is building separation formulation is appropriate to provide expansion/moment joint in my case?
      2- I am trying to allow the movement through slotted holes in base plate. If my bridge required expansion is 300mm through formulation indicated in Point-1 above, should the slotted hole be twice of it i.e.  2x300mm = 600mm  
       
      I am still unsure as to what size the slotted hole should be ? and what governs the expansion joint of bridge over the ledge end. 
      I am relatively new to bridges. any help would be highly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
    • By waqar saleem
      Salam
      Girders of a bridge during launching collapsed. it is reported it happened due to heavy winds during launching of the girders,links for further details are attached.
      http://tribune.com.pk/story/1109218/rs330m-jhelum-bridge-collapses-ahead-inauguration/

      http://www.baaghi.tv/330-million-jhelum-bridge-collapsed-due-to-substandard-material-and-negligence-of-highways-department/
      Regards
    • By Ali Shan
      Can some body please give reference regarding torsional design of post-tensioned bridge girders? I have searched through AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specs but could not find a valid reference.
    • By saadyounas
      Hi guys
      In the question i have a super T girder with some reinforcement. Ques is I have to calculate compression strength in concrete block using formula C = gamma * 0.85 f'c * b (width)
      what value of b should i use to calculate this compressive force?
      thanks
      Saad

    • By ahmd8201
      Assalamualaikum dear forum members,
       
      I am currently designing a 35m span prestressed precast I beam bridge. The deck is formed from 300 rc insitu slab and the beams are 1.8m deep precast I beams. These span simply supported onto bearings shelf/abutment. Due to a high watertable, a secant pile wall option is used to form the abutments (with a hard/soft pile configuration). There is also a raft to form the underpass and act as a prop to the secant walls. 
       
      The secant walls are formed from 1200mm diam. piles and the raft is currently 2m deep. Apparently another engineer (quite senior) advised to have the raft dowelled into the piles, i.e. maybe 3 dowels per pile in the secant and then continued into the raft at an appropriate anchorage.
       
      The 35m span deck is supporting a curved road on top and the underpass is supporting 6 lanes of traffic. The whole bridge is designed to AASHTO
       
      I have a few issues which are troubling me which I would like to ask for opinions on;
       
       
      1) The prestressed I beams at ULS are sagging as they are simply supported. At SLS the ends are hogging; is this due to the prestressing force being too much? The secant pile wall is being designed by geotech. I assume that under any limit states as the deck is supported on bearings, the forces transferred to the secant will only ever be axial forces and shears ie. fx, fy, fz?
       
      2) The raft/ secant pile wall connection does not sound particularly convincing to me. The actual secant pile wall is very long and is about 480m. The raft slab therefore has movement joints every 10m or so. I thought that the raft plus secant could either be considered as an inverted portal frame or as a wall with a lateral prop. The senior engineer want to assume this is acting as an inverted portal frame but how can we have fully fixed moment connection with 3 dowel bars! Also if the abutment was actual wall, the raft could be detailed with rebar to be cast as a full moment connection, but with the secant the rebar will be very congested and I do not know an easier way to achieve this full moment connection of the raft with the secant. 
       
      Please advise.
    • By Nazish Fatima
      Has anyone done the wind analysis on bridges using British Standards ( BD 37/01). I have a few questions regarding its application on structure and live load both.
    • By muhammadrashid7
      Assalam O Alaikum Respected Members,
       
      Hope you all are doing good. Does anyone here know what is the procedure of bridge design. Or can anyone link me to any tutorial from where i can get guidance. I have a very basic understanding that too of the grillage design but want to know more about bridge design. 
       
      Thanks.
  • Recent Discussions

  • Latest Forum and Club Posts

    • Beams are flexural members only  designed for the major moment and shear without axial load effects. However, column design is more accurate as you can account for biaxial bending plus axial load effect on shear. Infact all the beams can be designed by this approach. However, generally beams do not have huge axial loads or minor bending. Thats why it is simplified.
    • I developed this sheet long time ago. See the attached. Strap footings design.xlsx
    • Here are my two cents:- 1. General guidance regarding placement of construction joints in RC work has been provided in Section 6.4 of ACI 318-08 and its commentary. Some clarity is given in section 6.4.3, where it is stated that "Construction joints shall be so made and located as not to impair the strength of the structure. Provision shall be made for transfer of shear and other forces through construction joints." For transfer of shear etc through construction joints, reference is made to the ACI Section 11.6.9 that deals with the calculation of shear-friction, at the interface between two concretes cast at different times (beside other situations described in section 11.6.1 of the code). Moreover, Section 6.4.4 suggests that "Construction joints in floors shall be located within the middle third of spans of slabs, beams, and girders. 2. Regarding construction joints in columns, however, Section 6.4 does not provide guidance clearer  than that in Section 6.4.6 stating that the "Beams, girders, or slabs supported by columns or walls shall not be cast or erected until concrete in the vertical support members is no longer plastic."  And, the commentary section R6.4.6 explains that "Delay in placing concrete in members supported by columns and walls is necessary to prevent cracking at the interface of the slab and supporting member caused by bleeding and settlement of plastic concrete in the supporting member. 3. The support member (referred in previous paragraph) will generally be a column or a wall. And, in a simplified form, Section 6.4.4 & its commentary are advising us NOT to cast beams & slab monolithically with the wall or column, BUT only after the supporting column (or wall) concrete has hardened,  in order to avoid plastic cracking at the beam-column (or beam-wall) joint. 4. In our normal field practice (within Pakistan as well as abroad), beams & slabs are cast at least one day after casting of columns or supporting walls. This gap of one day (between casting of column & beam concretes) ensures that hardening of column (or wall) concrete poured one day earlier has hardened (is no longer plastic),  thereby avoiding any possibility of plastic cracking (discussed in paragraph 2 above). . 5. Now coming to your queries; In general terms, it is preferable to cast the column in one pour.. However, in compelling circumstances it may be done in more than one pour too, subject to certain conditions.   Already described in initial paragraphs.   This is the normal & IMHO desirable practice, according to ACI code Section 6.4.6.   IMO, leaving 9" or 12" column depth below the beam soffit is excessive & undesirable. It should not be more than 1" or 2" in any case.   IMO, this practice is based on the requirements of ACI 318-08 (also ACI 318-11) Section 6.4.6. The same requirement is available in ACI 318-14 Section 26.5.7.2 (a) as well. HTH Regards.
    • Thank you Waqar. I need code reference for this practice.   Thanks
    • Salam Dear Junaid! Cold joints are common and practice is upto soffit, properly roughen the face and apply some chemical at the joint. Leaving column at mid height is not good. Regards
    • References given in the following link might be useful in this connection: http://www.sepakistan.com/topic/1978-strap-footing-design/ Regards.  
    • Any sheet/pdf for design of concentric and edge footing tied with strap beam?
    • AoA all, Is it mandatory to do column concreting upto the soffit of the beam in a single pour ? What code says about the construction/cold joint location in column ? Majority of the contractors are pouring the column concrete upto the soffit of the beam (full height of the column), some contractors leave the column height about 9" to 12" below the beam level and then fill this 9" to 12" column height with the beams & slab concreting. On one site column concreting was stopped at the mid height and the remaining half was filled on the next day. Thanks    
    • SIR KINDLY STUDY building code(ACI318-14) AS WELL AND THEN DISCUSS
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.