Jump to content
  • Welcome to SEFP!

    Welcome!

    Welcome to our community forums, full of great discussions about Structural Engineering. Please register to become a part of our thriving group or login if you are already registered.

Sign in to follow this  
ZIA UD DIN

Conceal Beam

Recommended Posts

My friends, How to decide the width of the conceal beam . Which formula is used for it ?Secondly, How to make sure that conceal beam width is sufficient for controlling deflection in it ? Thirdly, if there is any conceal beam supporting a wall on slab. As this conceal beam will only support weight of the wall or also some portion of the slab as well as described by the area distribution method for others beams( L,T Beams) ? Friends I need your replies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/3/2016 at 4:27 AM, ZIA UD DIN said:

Thirdly, if there is any conceal beam supporting a wall on slab; As this conceal beam will only support weight of the wall or also some portion of the slab as well as described by the area distribution method for others beams

On 11/3/2016 at 4:27 AM, ZIA UD DIN said:

My friends, How to decide the width of the conceal beam

 

Some portion of slab is used by many engineers to take into the account the effect of line load on the slab. Many call it a beam, because the reinforcement arrangement resembles like a beam. But it cannot technically be called a beam; beam is a member that attracts force by virtue of its stiffness. Since, the thickness of so called beam is equal to that a slab, it cannot attract forces.

It is a simplified way of taking into the account the effect of line load on slab; by arranging reinforcement in this way, one assumes that the effect of line load will be limited within the width of so called beam. So the width of the beam will be decided by the design moment.

The beam will be only designed for the load of the supported wall, or the load of supported wall + the load transferred by the wall from upper levels. The so called beam cannot take any load from adjacent slab area, as it does not have the stiffness to attract any load. So tributary area thing is not applicable to that member.

If you understand what is written above, you should conclude that there is no need to check the deflection.

In many cases, this way of locally reinforcing the slab ( so called concealed beam) will not be able to support the load transferred from above levels, unless you increase the thickness of slab.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If beam is stiffer than slab, the slab will bend down more and beam will bend less. In this case slab load will be transferred to beam and beam will be supporting load of wall as well as load of slab on the base of tributary area. But since CONCEALED beam is not thick enough to be stiff enough so it will not support slab.  It will just act as part of slab because it has same thickness as slab (please note that stiffness is mainly dependent on cross section and affected very little by reinforcement). If you think wall load can not be born by slab alone, instead of providing concealed beam, either go for inverted beam or convince architect for suspended beam.

 

@baz Brother I m confused whether providing reinforcement below wall in slab is beneficial by any mean (regarding strength or serviceability)?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2016-11-25 at 7:06 PM, Engr Waqas said:

If beam is stiffer than slab, the slab will bend down more and beam will bend less. In this case slab load will be transferred to beam and beam will be supporting load of wall as well as load of slab on the base of tributary area. But since CONCEALED beam is not thick enough to be stiff enough so it will not support slab.  It will just act as part of slab because it has same thickness as slab (please note that stiffness is mainly dependent on cross section and affected very little by reinforcement). If you think wall load can not be born by slab alone, instead of providing concealed beam, either go for inverted beam or convince architect for suspended beam.

 

@baz Brother I m confused whether providing reinforcement below wall in slab is beneficial by any mean (regarding strength or serviceability)?

There might be some affect on deflection due to additional reinfo.

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

On 11/25/2016 at 7:06 PM, Engr Waqas said:

I m confused whether providing reinforcement below wall in slab is beneficial by any mean (regarding strength or serviceability)?

AFAIK, provision of additional reinforcement in the slab portion below the  wall, will at least reduce the long term deflection to certain extent.

Regards.

Edited by engruzair

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Our picks

    • AoA all,

      Is it mandatory to do column concreting upto the soffit of the beam in a single pour ?

      What code says about the construction/cold joint location in column ?

      Majority of the contractors are pouring the column concrete upto the soffit of the beam (full height of the column), some contractors leave the column height about 9" to 12" below the beam level and then fill this 9" to 12" column height with the beams & slab concreting. On one site column concreting was stopped at the mid height and the remaining half was filled on the next day.

      Thanks

       

       
      • 4 replies
    • AOA 

      i am facing problems in shear wall design .what are the pier and spandral ?what will be the difference when we assign pier or spandral? without assigning these the shear wall design is incomplete .

      i am taking about etabsv16

      someone have document about shear wall design plz provide it 

      thank you

       
      • 9 replies
    • Salam Members,

      Congratulations to Engineers, PEC has become full signatory of Washington Accord, what are the benefits to Pakistani engineers for this agreement. 

       

      Regards   

       

       
      • 3 replies
    • Please clarify the following confusions one by one:-

       

      1. If we run P-delta analysis in ETABS, then should we ignore stiffness property modifiers for beams and columns? I have heard that if we perform P-delta analysis and apply stiffness modifiers at the same time then the moment magnification process is doubled...?

       

      2. ETABS considers selenderness of a column by applying moment magnification factors. If we run P-delta analysis also, does it mean that the selenderness of column is being over-estimated? I mean once the moments are magnified in P-delta analysis process and again through moment magnification process?

       

      Please help me understand the software myth and clarify above confusions.
      • 1 reply
    • Assalam o alaikum.
      According to ACI 12.5.2,
      development length for fc' = 3000, fy=60000, for normal weight concrete and epoxy less reinforcement, The required development length comes out to be
      for #3 = 8.2 inch
      for #4 = 10.95 inch
      for #6 = 16.42 inch
      for #8 = 21.9 inch
       
      And if in my case, ACI 12.5.3 is not fulfilled, it means now i have to provide ldh as mentioned above. ldh is STRAIGHT EMBEDMENT LENGTH + RADIUS OF BEND + ONE BAR DIAMETER as shown in figure attached. Now my question is, if in my case, main reinforcement of beam is of #6 and #4, minimum column size required will be 18 inch and 12 inch respectively. Lets say by any means, i can not select #4, #3 bars and size of column where bars are to be terminated is 12 inch, how to fullfil this development length???
      • 11 replies
    • Dear all,

      I am trying to design shearwalls through ETABS with temperature load applied over shell. At various location, spandral section fails in Shear due to temperature and piers (sometime in shear, mostly in flexure).  (See Attached Image)

      Certainly all the problem in Shearwalls are due to temperature. I don't want to increase cross section of spandral or pier at some location just due to temperature load case as it will appears non-uniform with rest of the wall. 

      I have seen stiffness modifier affect distribution of forces and also rigid/semi rigid daiphragm assumption. 

       

      Can anybody guide how to properly design the shear wall with temperature load applied in ETABS or share any similar experience. Thanks in Advance.    
      • 15 replies
    • ENGINEERS;
      I WILL LOOSE MY BRAIN FROM ETABS. 
      I DECIDED TO MAKE MANUAL MESHING FROM AREA ELEMENTS BESIDE EACH OTHER AND EVERY HING WAS FINE .
      BUT AFTER DEVISION SAY 7*7 ELEMNTS FOR EVERY BIG ELEMENT AND MAKING ETABS CHECH..................THEN 500 ERROR MESSAGE THAT ALL ELEMNTS ARE CLOSE TO EACH OTHER.  WHAT ARE GOING...... SOMEONE TELL ME PLEASE...... I WILL LOST MY WORK
      • 6 replies
    • Assalam o alaikum.
      I have just designed a frame structure with SMRF. The out put of shear seams weird to me. Column reports design shear Av/s as 0.045. (Images are attached). but when i right click the member, it must show me the most critical case HIGHLIGHTED AUTOMATICALLY. But it highlights load combo 38 (auto-generated combos have been used) which reports Av/s as 0.038. And 0.045 value is at combo 32. Is their any logic behind it?? More over how to interpret this Av/s?? means 0.045 in kip-in units means what? How can i convert this into spacing?? 
      • 9 replies
    • Hello everyone, I hope all of you will be fine. In etabs when we apply Response Spectrum loading on a multistoried building with 2 basement floors. At what floor level this loading will be applied as in equivalent static seismic analysis, we can apply EQX & EQY on any floor we like as this option is available in etabs but the problem is with response spectrum and time history analysis. please if someone knows and have the experince, share it i shall be very thankful.  
      • 5 replies
    • Salaikom dear professionals,
      First of all I would like to express my sincere thanks to the initiators of this forum for establishing such an exceptional atmosphere for knowledge/experience sharing, I it is really useful, In fact since I have found the forum I am mostly online and busy reading the posts. I would also like to thank the members for their professional comments and advice.
      As my first post in this forum I would like to ask the following queries:
      1-After running the analysis and design when I check the DESIGN DATA through Display >> Show Tables >> DESIGN DATA >> Concrete Frame Output, there is no specific message in Column Summary Data and Beam Summary Data, but in Joint summary data it is showing that “Joint B/C check not done”. Does anyone has any idea? I am sharing the ETABS model for your information and easy reference.
      ETABS MODEL.zip
      2- ETABS provides greater area of steel in the upper column than the column at BASE, perhaps due to higher moment. Could someone explain why this is so? In practice should we maintain maximum steel in both stories? Or we shall follow what the software suggests?
      3- Beside considering the minimum thickness required for deflection control of Beam as per Table 9.a Chapter 9 ACI-318 , using concrete crack behavior in ETABS and checking story drift, Do we have to check the deflection of beams for the serviceability propose elsewhere in ETBAS? If yes, Could anyone explain it?
      Regards, and look forward to any explanation
      • 13 replies
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.