Jump to content
Structural Engineering Forum Of Pakistan
  • Welcome to SEFP!

    Welcome!

    Welcome to our community forums, full of great discussions about Structural Engineering. Please register to become a part of our thriving group or login if you are already registered.

Sign in to follow this  
farooqbro

Meshing in Etabs - Why do we do meshing

Recommended Posts

A0A 

hope all will be fine

why we use meshing in modal? i was doing a project of six story having shear ,without any mesh its deflection was about 2.5" and when i meshed both wall and slabs and also apply restrained to slab than the deflection decreases tremendously.?

is this because of meshing or restraints or something else .i am using etabs v16

please guide me 

thank you

 

Edited by UmarMakhzumi
Updated topic title to make more relevant to question

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WS Farooq,

Very good question. Meshing is critical to carry out a finite element analysis as analysis is done on certain points (nodes/ mesh corners) and results are interpolated between adjacent nodes. Without meshing, results would be too vague. I have attached a document that explains the logic behind meshing and its affects on analysis. Please have a read. Then you will be able to understand why your results are different for case when  you did meshing and when you didn't.

Thanks.

 

Why do we do meshing.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Our picks

    • Dear All,

      The forum has been updated today with a lot new features.

      You can find the list of all the new improvements by visiting this website.

      Some highlights are:

      1) Improved Search Features


      2) Emoji

      Emoji support is now available in all editors.


      Do check out the link posted above for the complete list.

      One additional announcement that I would like to make is that with reference to last forum update post (read below),  @Rana and @BAZ are forum Admins now. I think it was important to do as it brings more transparency for the forum and also helps spread the responsibility. The forum belongs to the members so it never made sense for one person to be Admin,

      As always, feedback is much appreciated.

      Thanks for taking the time out to read this update.

      Cheers!

       
      • 2 replies
    • Hi guys just to discuss with you my understanding of crack widths in Environmental structures according to ACI. 

       

      ---------------------------

      Normal structures

      ---------------------------

       

      1. ACI 318-95 based on statistical method of Gergely & Lutz 1968 limits Z based on exposure. We are calculating crack widths here. (Normal structures)

       

      2. ACI 318-99 proposed limiting the spacing and removed actually calculating the width and also removed the exposure conditions. For example for beams and one-way slabs s (in) = 540/fs -2.5cc or in other words limiting the fs=0.6fy  (For normal structures)

       

      3. ACI 224R-01 references method 1 and 2 above and 3 european codes.

      The most confusing part is the table in which Nawy suggests 0.1mm crack width for water-tight structures. The whole document is for normal structures except this line. And people are following this line and refer to this document for water tight structures. I mean its just a suggestion and by the way this method 1 is obsolete now since ACI 318-99 (see point 2 above).

       

      ---------------------------

      Water tight structures

      ---------------------------

       

      1. ACI 318-08 states clearly that for watertight structures ACI 350-06 codes should be used. 

       

      2. ACI 224.4R-13 also specifically states that for watertight structures walls in section 7.4, we should use ACI 350-06. 

       

      3. ACI 350-06 for water tight structures does not recommend calculating a number for crack width but rather limiting max steel stress in bars to be 20k ksi or fs=0.33fy for normal conditions.

       

      ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      To sum it up, 

       

      Philosophy of crack width control is not to calculate probable crack widths but to limit the max stress in steel bars.

       

      For normal structures: fs=0.6fy and for water tight structures fs=0.33fy
      • 1 reply
    • Hi

      I want to know the use of diaphragms in etabs. i discus many people who are use etabs but i can't get justified answer about the application of etabs.

      I read the Technical reference  of  Etabs, where they write about Diaphragms. i get two type of diaphragms (plate or shell and joint or beam). 

      My question.

      1. When do i use Shell diaphragms (if floor present ) 

      2.When do i use joint diaphragms ( grade beam level where no slab are provide) 

       

      NB: Diaphragms use to transfer the lateral load to the resisting element ( frame such as column. beam,shear wall) 
      • 2 replies
    • *SEFP Consistent Design*<br style="color:#272a34">*Pile Design*<br style="color:#272a34">*Doc No: 10-00-CD-0005*<br style="color:#272a34">*Date: Nov 21, 2017*<br style="color:#272a34">
       

      This article is intended to cover design of piles using Ultimate Limit State (ULS) method. The use of ULS method is fairly new for geotechnical design (last decade). The method is being used in multiple countries now (Canada, Australia etc). The following items shall be discussed:

      Overview


      Geotechnical Design of Piles (Compression Loads, Tension Loads and Lateral Loads)


      Structural Design of Piles (Covering both Concrete and Steel)


      Connection of Pile with the foundation (Covering both Concrete and Steel)


      Pile Group Settlement


      Things to consider



       

      1. Overview

      Piles provide a suitable load path to transfer super-structure loads to foundation where shallow foundation are not suitable - this can be due to a number of reasons like existing space constraints or suitable soil strata is not present immediately below structure. Other uses can be to meet design requirements like to have reduced settlement etc.

      This article shall cover the use of straight shaft cast-in-place concrete piles and straight shaft driven steel pipe piles. There are a number of additional piles types like belled concrete piles, precast concrete piles, screw / helical steel piles etc but the discussion to choose a suitable pile type is not in the intended scope of this article. The article is intended  to discuss design requirements for straight shaft piles only (both concrete and steel) . The aforementioned topic about pile selection is a very diverse subject and requires a separate discussion on its own.

      Click on the link to read the full article.
       
      • 9 replies
    • I am suppose to design a pile foundation for a machine weighing approximately 50 tons and with an operational loading of 100 tons. 
      I ll appreciate your help in terms of guidance & provision of notes...  
       
      Thank you..
      • 36 replies
    • Material behavior can be idealized as consisting of an 'elastic' domain and a 'plastic' domain. For almost 200 years, structural design has been
      based on an elastic theory which assumes that structures display a linear response throughout their loading history, ignoring the post-yielding
      stage of behavior. Current design practice for reinforced concrete structures is a curious blend of elastic analysis to compute forces and moments, plasticity theory to proportion cross-sections for the moment and axial, load, and empirical mumbo-jumbo to proportion members for shear.

       

      From the book "Design of Concrete Structures with Stress Fields" by A. Muttoni,  J. Schwartz and  B.Thurliman.

       
      • 0 replies
    • 9th International Civil Engineering Conference (ICEC 2017), December 22-23, 2017, Karachi, Pakistan
      Dear Fellow Researchers, Academicians, and research students,

       

      NED University of Engineering & Technology in collaboration with Institution of Engineers Pakistan (IEP) is organizing 9th International Civil Engineering Conference (ICEC 2017) on December 22-23, 2017 at Karachi, Pakistan.

       The congress details are available at its website www.neduet.edu.pk/icec

       Also attached is congress flyer for information and dissemination among your peers.

       Abstracts submission deadline has been extended till October 31, 2017.

      Please click on the link to see the full description.
      • 0 replies
    • AoA all,

      Is it mandatory to do column concreting upto the soffit of the beam in a single pour ?

      What code says about the construction/cold joint location in column ?

      Majority of the contractors are pouring the column concrete upto the soffit of the beam (full height of the column), some contractors leave the column height about 9" to 12" below the beam level and then fill this 9" to 12" column height with the beams & slab concreting. On one site column concreting was stopped at the mid height and the remaining half was filled on the next day.

      Thanks

       

       
      • 5 replies
    • AOA 

      i am facing problems in shear wall design .what are the pier and spandral ?what will be the difference when we assign pier or spandral? without assigning these the shear wall design is incomplete .

      i am taking about etabsv16

      someone have document about shear wall design plz provide it 

      thank you

       
      • 10 replies
    • Salam Members,

      Congratulations to Engineers, PEC has become full signatory of Washington Accord, what are the benefits to Pakistani engineers for this agreement. 

       

      Regards   

       

       
      • 3 replies
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Hafsa Azmat
      Hey there, 
      I wana know whats the size of frame object auto internal meshing into discrete elements in CSI softwares (Etab, Sap) and how can i see it in my program to verify it, (extrude view  is helpful as per i have tried it ). Any reference where they are mentioning it , I have gone through analysis manual but couldn't find it there , or may be i have missed. Please comment your views.
    • By Zap Bran
      Hi All,
      The following website has number of free civil engineering software and design sheets.
      Softwares
      Continuous beam analyzer -> https://sites.google.com/site/samsoninfinite/home/beam-analyzer
      2D Truss Analyzer -> https://sites.google.com/site/samsoninfinite/home/plane-truss-analyzer
      2D Frame Analyzer -> https://sites.google.com/site/samsoninfinite/home/plane-frame-analyzer
      Plane Stress Analyzer -> https://sites.google.com/site/samsoninfinite/home/plane-stress-analyzer
      3D Truss and 3D Frame analyzer under development
      Design Sheets
      Beam Design ACI code -> https://sites.google.com/site/samsoninfinite/design-spreadsheets/rc-beam-aci-code-design-concrete
      Steel girder Offshore structure design ->
      https://sites.google.com/site/samsoninfinite/design-spreadsheets/t-girder-design-steel
       
      This website is constantly updated.
      Regards
      Zap Bran
    • By Jaher Wasim
      I am designing a 10 storied industrial building . Architect used a slanted wall in the front elevation of the building for aesthetic reason. But for structural framing I need to model this shear wall in ETABS. Is is possible in ETABS or I have to use any other software?
    • By Ussama Waseem
      Attached are two screenshots of the analysis of a continuous beam. One represents drop of loads from slabs with incorrect meshing(Auto meshing) and the other represents with correct meshing(manual meshing). Apparently, there is a big difference in the analysis results of the two mentioned by the circles. I posted it here to get further elaborations from the members to understand ETABS in a better way. Hope we can dig it more.


    • By mhdhamood
      ENGINEERS;
      I WILL LOOSE MY BRAIN FROM ETABS. 
      I DECIDED TO MAKE MANUAL MESHING FROM AREA ELEMENTS BESIDE EACH OTHER AND EVERY HING WAS FINE .
      BUT AFTER DEVISION SAY 7*7 ELEMNTS FOR EVERY BIG ELEMENT AND MAKING ETABS CHECH..................THEN 500 ERROR MESSAGE THAT ALL ELEMNTS ARE CLOSE TO EACH OTHER.  WHAT ARE GOING...... SOMEONE TELL ME PLEASE...... I WILL LOST MY WORK
    • By Fatima Khalid
      Asalamualaikum,
      I have applied point load on cantilever beam (Lx=1m Ly=0.1m Lz=0.1m) at its free end (1N in z direction). i have divided the load on each node at top and bottom fibre (as shown in figure). why the software showing the SXY and and SYZ stresses since they will only develop due to torsion. it should show only SZX stress which are due to shear i.e VQ/Ib.
      i have also put poison ratio as zero.
      if i change the loading condition to uniform distributed loading, then it gives SXY,SYZ=0.
      Thankyou
      attached is the file showing x and y axis of the beam. it also shows sxy, syz and szx respectively.


    • By danny740
      Hi,

      I have a problem with  a simply supported deep beam which has a uniformly distributed load. The beam is simply supported at both ends but I have to consider the results for the following 3 scenarios
      - where the support is at the bottom of each end of the beam
      - where the support is at the mid point at each end of the beam
      - where support is at top of each end of the beam

      I have run this using FEA and I'm finding significantly different deflections and stresses when the beam is supported at the midpoint at its end and the other two scenarios...can anyone explain the exact reasoning for this?

      Sincere thanks
       
      Daniel
    • By Haneen Bdoor
      Salam everyone,
       
      i want to attach my etabs model to learn about the problems in it,i meshed the shell elements but when i run it there apears to be warning masseges about lost digits of accuracy.
       
      my etabs version is 9.7.4
       
      thank you.
       
       
       
      model.rar
    • By bayan nassar
      السلام عليكم
      What is the best way for doing mesh in Etabs 2013 ?? and is there any difference from older versions ??
  • Recent Discussions

  • Latest Forum and Club Posts

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.