Jump to content
Structural Engineering Forum Of Pakistan
  • Welcome to SEFP!

    Welcome!

    Welcome to our community forums, full of great discussions about Structural Engineering. Please register to become a part of our thriving group or login if you are already registered.

Ahsan Kazmi

FOUNDATION DESIGN IN SAFE

Recommended Posts

1. To check soil pressure in SAFE v8,

- After running the analysis, go to Diplay menu,

- Select 'Show Reaction Forces...',

- Select 'Soil Pressures',

- Select the Load case or combination,

- Click on OK.

2. Minimum & maximum pressures are the Actual range of calculated pressures anywhere on the given foundation.

3. The limit of pressure is the Allowable Soil Bearing Pressure provided by a geotechnical engineer, after carrying out necessary field & laboratory tests on the at the project site or the soil samples taken from the site.

Regards.

 

Edited by EngrUzair
2-spelling corrections

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Rana i am using SAFE 14. Actually there is R C C Wall in boundary of structure and all columns are in periphery as well. So negative pressure in periphery is exceeding the allowable limit but i cannot increase area. So please suggest Solution.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rana,

What is the solution if I cannot

6 hours ago, Rana said:

1. Depending on how much the value is exceeding you could increase thickness of the footing.

2. Soil improvement.

3. Reduce loads/stories.

 

If it is not possible to do all these solution, what shall he do, because this is the local pressure at one side only.

 the average total pressure may be very less than the allowable pressure

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends on the ratio of local area vs total area. It also depends on the location and importance of localized stress area among other factors. This is engineering judgement beyond the number crunching drudgery. I cant provide this as I am not aware of the project details. You could refer to your seniors for this.

And remember do not stop at this. There is always a solution no matter how hard the problem is.

For example may be your geotech engineer might suggest a lesser soil stiffness value at this location which will help reduce the stresses. You might increase the local thickness to better distribute the pressure. You could optimize the load combinations or even the load path of superstructure not to have the concentration here.

An important point here is if this is localized compression at corner then is it due to lateral loads? If yes then watchout for the reverse that is tension (blue color contours). This will be another whole new problem.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Ahsan,

1- consider the relieving pressure of soil as your model shows basement.

2- provide stiff element at the edges of raft as there is basement wall all around.

3-increase in thickness also decreases the pressure, check increasing raft thickness.

4-make sure that actual raft area is provided in SAFE, sometimes it is mistakenly considered less when raft is drawn on center points of the columns, actually you should provide the offset of half column width or depth as per condition on edges. 

5- check loads applied on the floors, finishes, walls, decrease where-ever you can, make deduction of windows and doors, check if lighter elements are available, decrease thickness of slabs if possible.

6-Add one column in between all grids if possible, 

7-offset your columns some distance 2' or 2.5' inwards, ask the architect, share your problem.  

4-if none of the above options and solution provided by seniors work, have review of geotech and go for piled raft.

 

Regards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, waqar saleem said:

1- consider the relieving pressure of soil as your model shows basement.

2- provide stiff element at the edges of raft as there is basement wall all around.

Dear Waqar Saleem, 

Thanks for such comprehensive reply can you please elaborate how can i apply these two points in SAFE.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Ahsan,

1-If you are excavating 10'(say) from NSL,soil strata is under load of this much soil 10x120=1200psf, you are provided bearing capacity at -10 by the geotech, 1tsf=2204psf, you can add 2204+1200=3404psf for bearing pressude check, but discuss this condition to your geotech, also there is safety factor of 3-5 in geotech calculations, decreasing this FOS to 2 or at some lower value as geotech allow, earing pressure issue can be addressed.

2-define a stiff element in safe where you define your foundation section, and assign the area below basement wall as stiff.

 

Regards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, waqar saleem said:

Dear Ahsan,

1-If you are excavating 10'(say) from NSL,soil strata is under load of this much soil 10x120=1200psf, you are provided bearing capacity at -10 by the geotech, 1tsf=2204psf, you can add 2204+1200=3404psf for bearing pressude check, but discuss this condition to your geotech, also there is safety factor of 3-5 in geotech calculations, decreasing this FOS to 2 or at some lower value as geotech allow, earing pressure issue can be addressed.

2-define a stiff element in safe where you define your foundation section, and assign the area below basement wall as stiff.

 

Regards

anaylsis of raft should be run with option 3D OR 2D?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Our picks

    • Dear All,

      The forum has been updated today with a lot new features.

      You can find the list of all the new improvements by visiting this website.

      Some highlights are:

      1) Improved Search Features


      2) Emoji

      Emoji support is now available in all editors.


      Do check out the link posted above for the complete list.

      One additional announcement that I would like to make is that with reference to last forum update post (read below),  @Rana and @BAZ are forum Admins now. I think it was important to do as it brings more transparency for the forum and also helps spread the responsibility. The forum belongs to the members so it never made sense for one person to be Admin,

      As always, feedback is much appreciated.

      Thanks for taking the time out to read this update.

      Cheers!

       
      • 2 replies
    • Hi guys just to discuss with you my understanding of crack widths in Environmental structures according to ACI. 

       

      ---------------------------

      Normal structures

      ---------------------------

       

      1. ACI 318-95 based on statistical method of Gergely & Lutz 1968 limits Z based on exposure. We are calculating crack widths here. (Normal structures)

       

      2. ACI 318-99 proposed limiting the spacing and removed actually calculating the width and also removed the exposure conditions. For example for beams and one-way slabs s (in) = 540/fs -2.5cc or in other words limiting the fs=0.6fy  (For normal structures)

       

      3. ACI 224R-01 references method 1 and 2 above and 3 european codes.

      The most confusing part is the table in which Nawy suggests 0.1mm crack width for water-tight structures. The whole document is for normal structures except this line. And people are following this line and refer to this document for water tight structures. I mean its just a suggestion and by the way this method 1 is obsolete now since ACI 318-99 (see point 2 above).

       

      ---------------------------

      Water tight structures

      ---------------------------

       

      1. ACI 318-08 states clearly that for watertight structures ACI 350-06 codes should be used. 

       

      2. ACI 224.4R-13 also specifically states that for watertight structures walls in section 7.4, we should use ACI 350-06. 

       

      3. ACI 350-06 for water tight structures does not recommend calculating a number for crack width but rather limiting max steel stress in bars to be 20k ksi or fs=0.33fy for normal conditions.

       

      ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      To sum it up, 

       

      Philosophy of crack width control is not to calculate probable crack widths but to limit the max stress in steel bars.

       

      For normal structures: fs=0.6fy and for water tight structures fs=0.33fy
      • 1 reply
    • Hi

      I want to know the use of diaphragms in etabs. i discus many people who are use etabs but i can't get justified answer about the application of etabs.

      I read the Technical reference  of  Etabs, where they write about Diaphragms. i get two type of diaphragms (plate or shell and joint or beam). 

      My question.

      1. When do i use Shell diaphragms (if floor present ) 

      2.When do i use joint diaphragms ( grade beam level where no slab are provide) 

       

      NB: Diaphragms use to transfer the lateral load to the resisting element ( frame such as column. beam,shear wall) 
      • 2 replies
    • *SEFP Consistent Design*<br style="color:#272a34">*Pile Design*<br style="color:#272a34">*Doc No: 10-00-CD-0005*<br style="color:#272a34">*Date: Nov 21, 2017*<br style="color:#272a34">
       

      This article is intended to cover design of piles using Ultimate Limit State (ULS) method. The use of ULS method is fairly new for geotechnical design (last decade). The method is being used in multiple countries now (Canada, Australia etc). The following items shall be discussed:

      Overview


      Geotechnical Design of Piles (Compression Loads, Tension Loads and Lateral Loads)


      Structural Design of Piles (Covering both Concrete and Steel)


      Connection of Pile with the foundation (Covering both Concrete and Steel)


      Pile Group Settlement


      Things to consider



       

      1. Overview

      Piles provide a suitable load path to transfer super-structure loads to foundation where shallow foundation are not suitable - this can be due to a number of reasons like existing space constraints or suitable soil strata is not present immediately below structure. Other uses can be to meet design requirements like to have reduced settlement etc.

      This article shall cover the use of straight shaft cast-in-place concrete piles and straight shaft driven steel pipe piles. There are a number of additional piles types like belled concrete piles, precast concrete piles, screw / helical steel piles etc but the discussion to choose a suitable pile type is not in the intended scope of this article. The article is intended  to discuss design requirements for straight shaft piles only (both concrete and steel) . The aforementioned topic about pile selection is a very diverse subject and requires a separate discussion on its own.

      Click on the link to read the full article.
       
      • 9 replies
    • I am suppose to design a pile foundation for a machine weighing approximately 50 tons and with an operational loading of 100 tons. 
      I ll appreciate your help in terms of guidance & provision of notes...  
       
      Thank you..
      • 36 replies
    • Material behavior can be idealized as consisting of an 'elastic' domain and a 'plastic' domain. For almost 200 years, structural design has been
      based on an elastic theory which assumes that structures display a linear response throughout their loading history, ignoring the post-yielding
      stage of behavior. Current design practice for reinforced concrete structures is a curious blend of elastic analysis to compute forces and moments, plasticity theory to proportion cross-sections for the moment and axial, load, and empirical mumbo-jumbo to proportion members for shear.

       

      From the book "Design of Concrete Structures with Stress Fields" by A. Muttoni,  J. Schwartz and  B.Thurliman.

       
      • 0 replies
    • 9th International Civil Engineering Conference (ICEC 2017), December 22-23, 2017, Karachi, Pakistan
      Dear Fellow Researchers, Academicians, and research students,

       

      NED University of Engineering & Technology in collaboration with Institution of Engineers Pakistan (IEP) is organizing 9th International Civil Engineering Conference (ICEC 2017) on December 22-23, 2017 at Karachi, Pakistan.

       The congress details are available at its website www.neduet.edu.pk/icec

       Also attached is congress flyer for information and dissemination among your peers.

       Abstracts submission deadline has been extended till October 31, 2017.

      Please click on the link to see the full description.
      • 0 replies
    • AoA all,

      Is it mandatory to do column concreting upto the soffit of the beam in a single pour ?

      What code says about the construction/cold joint location in column ?

      Majority of the contractors are pouring the column concrete upto the soffit of the beam (full height of the column), some contractors leave the column height about 9" to 12" below the beam level and then fill this 9" to 12" column height with the beams & slab concreting. On one site column concreting was stopped at the mid height and the remaining half was filled on the next day.

      Thanks

       

       
      • 5 replies
    • AOA 

      i am facing problems in shear wall design .what are the pier and spandral ?what will be the difference when we assign pier or spandral? without assigning these the shear wall design is incomplete .

      i am taking about etabsv16

      someone have document about shear wall design plz provide it 

      thank you

       
      • 10 replies
    • Salam Members,

      Congratulations to Engineers, PEC has become full signatory of Washington Accord, what are the benefits to Pakistani engineers for this agreement. 

       

      Regards   

       

       
      • 3 replies
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Saiful Islam Zaber
      How to model  mat on pile cap on SAFE ?  Does anyone have similar experience ? 
    • By Leomessi90
      Hello every one
      i modeled a flat plate with SAFE and after i run the analysis i got different results when i compare FEM with strip Forces for both M11 and M22
      these is so much different .
       
      one more thing  , i solved the same example with direct design method and when i compare it with Strip forces from SAFE there are good agreement , but when i compare it with FEM result by SAFE there are big differences !!
      does any one have information
      thanks


    • By Ahsan Kazmi
      Kindly recommend articles or books regarding the basics of the these softwares. Mainly describing the user interface, tools and some practical examples.  
    • By Fatima Al Zahraa Olleik
      Salam Alaykom All,
      I am modeling a refugee camp on Etabs. I have over 20 buildings to be modeled, each 5 share the same raft foundation , and each raft foundation is no more than 3 meters away from the other. For simplicity I modeled all 20 buildings in the same Etabs Model to Calculate the forces on the raft foundations. My question is :
      1_ Will the  Raft Foundations be Affected by each other , knowing that the buildings they support arent connected in any way?
       
    • By Ahsan Kazmi
      I have modeled B+G+6 story in etabs and exported its base with 9" thick and 12 feet high  RCC wall with option (export floor loads plus column and wall distortion). In Safe initially i defined raft and soil support properties. after analysis the minimum soil pressure was out range (7 ksf) while my allowable limit was 2.25ksf. Then i selected all the joint points of wall and assigned them fix supports the soil pressure suddenly reduced to almost zero value. Question is that which strategy of modeling is correct? Secondly when we export wall from etabs to safe its property changes to beam why this happens?
      Model is attached below.
      Raft 12.FDB
    • By Rana
      What could be the purpose of reducing raft stiffness by 60% (m11=m22=m12 modifiers of 0.4) in SAFE Model?
    • By Waqas Haider
      Assalam o alaikum,
      I am having a building with a semi circle shape. None of the footing is either parallel to global X-axis nor to the global Y-axis. The plan of footings is attached. The problem I am facing is, ETABS reports joint reactions along global X-axis and global Y-axis instead of along the local axes of column. Since my columns are at a degree to global axis, the joint reactions also becomes at a degree from column and footing. Since to use simple combined stress formula of 
      stress = P/A + Mx*Y/Ix + My*X/Iy 
      I need forces along axis of footing. Or i will have to resolve either moment of inertia of footing along direction of forces or vice versa, which is quite tough and time taking. The other option I can go for is to design footing in SAFE. But again here, there i dont find any option to rotate footing at a certain degree to match orientation of columns. If i rotate local axis of footing, It only rotates its local axes and meshing but not the footing physically itself. The orientation of footing remains same. How can i solve this problem? Either having reactions in etabs along local axes of columns can solve my issue so that i can design it manually or rotating footing in safe to match local axes of columns can solve my issue. So can any one guide me how to do either option? Thanks.
    • By spatio99
      I'm designing a flat slab structure with perimeter cladding that is to be anchored to the edges of the slab. The external cladding has a total weight per meter run of 5 KN/m. How can I apply this load to the slab edges so as to model the true behavior of the slab under loading in order to get accurate results from the analysis?
    • By Elias Hossain
      Assalamoalaikum Brothers.
      i am new in this forum and i am using SAFE for the first time.In one of our project we need data for a continuous footing connected with beam foundation.My superior wants me to give result on this within tomorrow.i have drawn a model in ETABS2015 and get results of foundation load.but i do not know how to export or for exporting how to draw this footing with beam in ETABS2015.Can you please help me in this problem?.just for immediate result.After tomorrow i will study about safe.But tomorrow i need immediate result.So please help me how to proceed on this topic like Engr. Waqas Brother.
  • Recent Discussions

  • Latest Forum and Club Posts

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.