Jump to content
  • Welcome to SEFP!

    Welcome!

    Welcome to our community forums, full of great discussions about Structural Engineering. Please register to become a part of our thriving group or login if you are already registered.

Safe Iterative Uplift Analysis


asadishaq
 Share

Recommended Posts

uplift non linear analysis is used so that we get zero tension soil! it can be done by iteration process by manually applying soil springs and removing tension springs...or more easily by program non linear uplift analysis option.

there is a big conceptual difference between safe 8 and 12. i bet most of the guys are still confused to see the difference between 2 programs of same example..

pls continue this topic..im willing to go in details but step by step

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The main difference between SAFE 8 and 12 is that

SAFE 8: was analysis 2D plate behaviour only

SAFE12: by default it takes full analysis rather than 2D plate

I dont my self aware of the full analysis which SAFE 12 does but the answer to the question that why NON LINEAR UPLIFT analysis in SAFE 8 takes no time and why in 12 it takes hours.

We faced this problem and asked CSI guyz! because personally i dont like the SAFE 8 interface but there were people saying that if you have to do the non linear analysis export it to SAFE 12 which i really dont like.

SAFE 8 was doing only 2D plate analysis (so you dont have to put restraint in x and y) only vertical springs. But in SAFE 12 if you run the analysis and check the log you will find that there is instability error because of no restraint in x and y.

in SAFE 12 the options to select non linear uplift analysis are also very complex. Its not clear to select NON LINEAR UPLIFT in individual load cases or to select the option CONVERT COMBO TO NON LINEAR COMBOS

well dont select the first option to check UPLIFT in each load case (results will be very strange)

rather convert all load combos to non linear for uplift (results will be fine)

but remember here that if you are doing 3d analysis without restraining in x and y your simplest model could take upto 3 hrs to run bcz of instabilities.

to compare the results with SAFE 8 and to save run time goto RUN>Advanced options> and select 2d plate analysis option

so by selecting just option you convert safe 12 to 8. no need to use the older version of SAFE

and also note that in

SAFE 12: Tension is + and Compression is -
SAFE 8: Tension is - and Compression is +

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SAFE perform iterative uplift analysis,any one having experience how to check the results of this analysis???what is the purpose and scope of this analysis???

This might be helpful. As you have asked how to check the result of the analysis.

SAFE - 10 Foundation Uplift

http://www.csiberkel...arn#page=page-1

Check the attached Seminar notes that I attended. Might help you.

Excerpt from the attached file. (Read 2 following paragraphs)

Iterative for Uplift. When the Analysis Type is Iterative for Uplift, accept the default values for the maximum number of iterations and the convergence tolerance or enter new values by typing them directly in the edit boxes. This option is specifically needed to remove any tension when analyzing mat foundations. Accept the default Maximum Mesh Dimension or enter a new value by typing in the edit box. The Maximum Mesh Dimension is described below.

etabs-concrete-design.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As you all know, that when foundation is subjected to tensile forces,sort of GAP arises at the interface between foundation(excluding pile) and soil.It is because there is no mechanism to transfer tension between two materials and besides both materials cannot take tension.Uplift analysis tries to capture this behaviour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i am using SAFE 12.3.1 and i think its the latest version

to draw a design strip select the layer A or B and then put the values of start and end of strip widths

For example you want to draw strips of 1m width then click on draw design strips. Select layer A and put 0.5 in all 4 boxes of left start width, left end width, right start width and right end width. This 0.5m or 0.5ft is above and top of center line of design strip so the total width is 1m. Then just replicate this line to cover all your slab.

Similary draw design strips for B layer.

You can draw A layer parallel to X direction and B layer parallel to y direction each 1m width. If you click on "SHOW STRIP WIDTH" in view options dialogue box you can see the widths on screen

Usually it doesnt matter you select column strip or middle stip because you are designing your for unit meter width. So you get reinforcement areas per m. If your strip width is more than 1m then you have to divide the resulting moments or reinforcement areas over that width to get moment per meter or reinforcement per meter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • Hi there,
      I am interested in performing "Performance Based Design" for a 20 story building. 
      I'll be performing "Non-Linear Static Pushover Analysis" for my model. Until now, I have decided to go with "Displacement Co-efficient method". I will be using ETABS 2017 for performing Pushover Analysis. While assigning plastic hinges, I have an option of using ASCE 41-17 (Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing buildings". I would like to know what would be a better estimate for relative distances for plastic hinges in case of beams, columns. Any input concerning assignment of hinges to beams, columns and shear walls is highly appreciated. Normally it's taken 0.05 and 0.95 or 0.1 and 0.9. What's your opinion on this?
      Secondly, it would be great if someone can recommend me a book or some good source to understand how to characterize building using performance levels. Any sort of help is appreciated.
      I have recently graduated and joined a structural design firm, so kindly guide me, considering me a beginner.

       
      • 2 replies
    • *SEFP Consistent Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Pile Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Doc No: 10-00-CD-0007*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Date: April 16, 2018*

      1.1. FUNCTION OF JOINT

      Beam-column joint must transfer the forces, such as moment, shear and torsion, transferred by the beam to the column so that the structure can maintain its integrity to carry loads for which it is designed.

      Another function of the beam-column joint is to help the structure to dissipate seismic forces so that it can behave in a ductile manner.

      1.2.WHY DO WE CARE

      During an extreme seismic event, the code-based structure is expected to maintain its load-carrying capacity for gravity loads even after the structure deforms into inelastic range so that it does not pose any life safety hazard. Hence, the joint can go through significant degradation of strength and stiffness, and if it fails in shear, or anchorage, the life-safety objective of code cannot be achieved.

      1.3.CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE


      1.4.THINGS TO CONSIDER FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      Longitudinal bars of beams, or slab, must be able to develop their yield stress, so that the beam/slab can transfer moment to joint. It means that longitudinal bars must have adequate development length for hooked bars. This implies that the size of the column must be such that bars can develop their tensile forces. If bars can transfer moment, they can also transfer shear as far as monolithic construction is concerned.


      The shear strength of the joint must enable the transfer of moment and shear through it.



      The joint should be Constructible: Congestion of reinforcement is the main concern.

      1.5.DESIGN SHEAR FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      The design shear for beam-column joint depends upon the relative strength of beam and column at the joint.

       
      • 4 replies
    • *Comments/Observations regarding modelling in ETABS*

      *Doc No: 10-00-CD-0006*

      *Date: May 06, 2017*

      Some of the observations made during extraction of results from ETABS (v 9.7.4), for design of reinforced concrete members, are being share in this article.,

      1) Minimum Eccentricity

      ETABS always considers the minimum eccentricity for selecting the design moment of columns irrespective of the probable behavior of the column, whether short or long column. See section 10.10.6.5 and its commentary of ACI 318-08 which deals with minimum eccentricity of long columns. You should always check the design moments that ETABS uses for columns if you want to bring down the cost of construction.

      2) Unbraced/ Braced Preference

      ETABS always performs analysis of frame as if it is un-braced. You should investigate if the storey under consideration is braced, or un-braced (10.10.5.2), and decide appropriate design moments of columns.

      3) Time Period

      ETABS has a tendency to select a time period of the building that is considerably less than the value obtained by the approximate method, Method A, of the section 1630.2.2  of UBC 97. To quote the FEMA 451 document: ''Because this formula is based on lower bound regression analysis of measured building response in California, it will generally result in periods that are lower (hence, more conservative for use in predicting base shear) than those computed from a more rigorous mathematical model". So, there is no need to use the value of time period that is lot less than Ta. One should always check the time period used by the software; ETABS can overestimate the seismic force by more than 2 times.

      Visit the forum link to read the complete article.
      Link: http://www.sepakistan.com/topic/2300-commentsobservations-regarding-modelling-in-etabs/
      • 0 replies
    • The minimum amount and spacing of reinforcement to be used in structural floors, roof slabs, and walls for control of temperature and shrinkage cracking is given in ACI 318 or in ACI 350R. The minimum-reinforcement percentage, which is between 0.18 and 0.20%, does not normally control cracks to within generally acceptable design limits. To control cracks to a more acceptable level, the percentage requirement needs to exceed about 0.60% (REFRENCE ACI COMMITE REPORT 224R-01)



       

       



       

       

      So according to above statement , should we follow 0.60%, to be on more safe side??



       
      • 12 replies
    • Dear Sir/Madam,

      This email is an invitation for the participation in the First South Asia Conference on Earthquake Engineering (SACEE-2019) which will be held on 21-22 February 2019 in Karachi, Pakistan. This conference is the inaugural event in this series of conferences which has been constituted under the auspices of South Asia Earthquake Network (SHAKE). The organisers of the conference include NED University, University of Porto, University of Fuzhou, University Roma Tre and Institution of Engineers Pakistan. The conference website can be visited at http://sacee.neduet.edu.pk/.

      Please note that world leading earthquake engineering experts have confirmed their participation in the conference. These include Prof Abdelkrim Aoudia (Italy), Prof Alper Ilki (Turkey), Dr Amod Mani Dixit (Nepal), Prof Bruno Briseghella (Italy), Prof George Mylonakis (UK), Prof Khalid Mosalam (USA), Prof Humberto Varum (Portugal) and many others. The presence of these distinguished experts allows you to exchange your work/issues with them and discuss possibility of any future collaboration. Please note that participation in the conference is strictly based on registration. Early registration in different categories at reduced rates are available till 10 December 2018. Please visit the conference website to see the details and the link for registration.

      If there are any queries, please do not hesitate to contact the Conference Secretary at the following address

      Prof. Muhammad Masood Rafi
      Conference Secretary- SACEE-2019
      Chairman
      Department of Earthquake Engineering
      NED University of Engineering & Technology Karachi, Pakistan.
      Phone: 0092-21-992-261261 Ext:2605
      Email: rafi-m@neduet.edu.pk
    • What is the Minimum reinforcement For Precast Pile  according to different codes (ACI,BS)??  Pile length is 40 times of pile least dimension . 
      • 1 reply
    • Dear members, I am working on a 10 storied rcc factory building with one basement,  where floor loads are in general 125 psf(Live) . but there are 2 warehouse in the building at ground floor & 10th floor where the Live load of stacked materials are 450psf. I have modeled it and analysed in ETABS. After analysis, seeing the floor displacement for seismic load,  i am in big shock to see the pattern. the displacement pattern suddenly increased hugely & then got normal . if the warehouse load created problem, then why it effected only Ground floor level, not the 10th floor! Please tell me how can i solve it. 
      • 1 reply
    • Asalamualaikum all,

      I have columns which are conflicting with the underground water tank as shown in figure.
       

      So I have decided to make underground water tank base slab as a footing for column. So I import etabs model to safe and just take uniform water load on base slab and point load from columns.

      This is the residential house. The BC is 2tsf. But SAFE is showing tension on the base slab and the thickness from punching is 30''. I believe that thickness is too high. What can be the error? Is this approach is correct for design base slab of ugwt to carry load of two edge columns?
      • 11 replies
    • SAFE perform iterative uplift analysis,any one having experience how to check the results of this analysis???what is the purpose and scope of this analysis???
      • 15 replies
    • Shear wall design
      AOA 

      i am facing problems in shear wall design .what are the pier and spandral ?what will be the difference when we assign pier or spandral? without assigning these the shear wall design is incomplete .

      i am taking about etabsv16

      someone have document about shear wall design plz provide it 

      thank you

       
      • 13 replies
  • Tell a friend

    Love Structural Engineering Forum Of Pakistan? Tell a friend!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.