Jump to content

Shamim Ahmmed

Member
  • Posts

    15
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Shamim Ahmmed

  1. 9 minutes ago, BAZ said:

    It is not only the difference of moments, the difference of axial load is also responsible for increased demand. The lower axial load, coupled with increased moments is the reason.

    In top story, the unbalanced moment is distributed among three members. In lower stories, four members share the unbalanced moment at the beam-column joint.

    It's helpful answer.

    According to your comment in concrete frame structure, column unbalanced moments  will be always greater than it's immediate lower story column moment?

    because top story will always three members.

  2. Thank you Sir @BAZ

    I got the point, why Longitudinal reinforcement increasing, Due to M2-2 & M-33 is greater in Upper story than Lower.
    But another question arrived in my mind why upper story M2-2 @ M3-3 is larger than bottom? File Attached.
    though I assigned less load in Upper story than Bottom story beam and slab.
    No Wind & earthquake load applied.
    Please Explain me.

    M2-2.JPG

    M3-3.JPG

    Design 2nd Floor column.JPG

    Design 1st Floor Column.JPG

  3. Assalamualaikum to all.
    I analyzed a two story residential concrete building in ETABS 9.7

    After designing the structure ETABS shows more Longitudinal Reinforcement in upper story.

    is it right??

    In my concept, bottom story longitudinal reinforcement should be large. 
    I modeled the structure as pin support at base and there is no seismic and wind load applied.

    Column axial load and longitudinal reinforcement snap shoot are attached below.

    Help me Please.
    Thanks in advance.
     

     

    Axial Force.JPG

    Rebar.JPG

  4. Assalamualaikum to all

    I analysed a two story  concrete Building in ETABS.
    After analysis the positive bending moment is +15.80 kip-ft and Negative B.M is -19.99 kip-ft

    when i design the building frame, ETABS calculate less positive B.M +9.99 kip-ft and negative B.M is  -19.99 kip-ft
    I can't understand why ETABS calculate less positive bending moment in designing?
    Please help me.
    Thanks in advance.

    Screenshot are given here.
     

    Analysis Bending Moment.JPG

    Design Bending Moment.JPG

    ACI Code.JPG

  5. Assalamualikum,
    I have analyzed a Beam Column Frame.
    All beam(9"x 24") and column(12"12) are in section.
    All columns are 20' spaced from each other.
    I imposed Super Dead Load 2.15 k/lf
    Live Load 2.65 k/lf
    In Moment 3-3,
    For typical load combination ( like 1.2 DL+1.6 LL)
    why positive bending moment changes due to its story height (marked in red circle) though all story beams are equally loaded.
    Can anyone tell me the reason?
     Thanks in advance.

    BM.JPG

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.