-
Posts
5 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Palash Engr
-
-
Honorable Engineers, Please see the attached 3 Photo. I have completed all works (Model/Design etc) of superstructure. now, for foundation design, when I searched for column/Shear Wall base reaction , I am seeing this strange negative point labels. This point labels are not shown in model, they are appearing in only the Tables (Display > Show Tables > Reaction) . Please help me to understand this things!
-
Dear members, I am working on a 10 storied rcc factory building with one basement, where floor loads are in general 125 psf(Live) . but there are 2 warehouse in the building at ground floor & 10th floor where the Live load of stacked materials are 450psf. I have modeled it and analysed in ETABS. After analysis, seeing the floor displacement for seismic load, i am in big shock to see the pattern. the displacement pattern suddenly increased hugely & then got normal . if the warehouse load created problem, then why it effected only Ground floor level, not the 10th floor! Please tell me how can i solve it.
-
On 5/24/2018 at 2:55 PM, Palash Engr said:
Dear Engineers, please reply this one. Someone please explain the results with detailing. What is 0.0064, 0.0116, 0.840 in^2/ft, 0.801 in^2/ft, 45.000, 45.000 here ?????
it will be very much appreciable if someone please upload a detail drawing like the following one i did. I think my concept of detailing shear wall section from ETABS result is not correct.
1 , 2 & 3... is anyone is near to correct drawing?
-
On 7/2/2017 at 6:43 PM, muneeb1213 said:
Hello waqas.. i really appreciate your effort. Can you please put some light on the results window in order to have a clear understandings of interpretation of results....
i have confusion regarding the top steel and bottom steel in flexure results.. which steel is this result talking about ...
thanks
Dear Engineers, please reply this one. Someone please explain the results with detailing. What is 0.0064, 0.0116, 0.840 in^2/ft, 0.801 in^2/ft, 45.000, 45.000 here ?????
Pile group construction error solution
in Foundation Design
Posted
Honorable Engineers, please see the attached photo. There was a 5P pile group but in real situation field Engineer moved one pile position from original. There is no way to re-constract one extra pile at original position. Please give a solution so that we can solve it by increasing cap thickness or increasing reinforcement of cap or both.
5P-pdf.pdf