Jump to content
  • Welcome to SEFP!

    Welcome!

    Welcome to our community forums, full of great discussions about Structural Engineering. Please register to become a part of our thriving group or login if you are already registered.

Help Needed Regarding Concrete Structure Designed In Etabs


haro0n
 Share

Recommended Posts

Assalam o alaikum

I am attaching a model which I have made in etabs. This was the assignment which teacher gave us to design it. I have designed it in etabs this is my first model and need your guidence I want to know whether its acceptable or not??? If I need to revise it what things I should change.??

Also after designing we can see longitudinal steel, shear reinforcement etc.. this is different for each section so how I can use these to select the bar reqirement, spacing e.t.c as we have one section plan for beam and column etc. but this is different for all sections so how I select this for column, beam et.c what about slab?? Its reinforcement etc.. I used property modifiers and other tips also which I found on this site so kindly guide me.

Details of the building r as follows.

4-story building

X-direction spacing = 6 @10 feet

Y-direction spacing =2 @20 feet

One way slab

Load is assigned using Shell/area loads ( I selected all panels of one story then applied the shell/area load dead, live et.c then for next story) but the load is not fully transferred to column etc, why? After analyzing the stress diagram looks odd to me.

Rcc wall is used in basement. Auto meshing is done 4x4

Seismic effect is not taken into account so only one load combo is used. I deleted the others but after analysis they were shown why??

How I will know that any member is failing and I need to change it??

In final design we show the bar, spacing, etc but as I mentioned it is change for every sections so how I should finalize this for column beam and what for rcc wall?? After analysis it looks like that no load is transferred to it..

Kindly check this model by performing manual checks on it. Waiting for ur response.

want to learn from ur experience :)

thanks in advance :)

assignment.rar

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assalam o alaikum

I am attaching a model which I have made in etabs. This was the assignment which teacher gave us to design it. I have designed it in etabs this is my first model and need your guidence I want to know whether its acceptable or not??? If I need to revise it what things I should change.?

In which semester you are? You should design manually..not in etabs at this stage..this is just my personal opinion. well from your question, you reminded me my undergrad period 3 yrs ago when i was asking more or less same questions from sir umar makhzumi..lolz...but its good to ask...keep it up! at this stage you cannot develope a full understanding of the concepts but atleast you started...so just stick it to it..and have patience...dont lost it...remember...

Also after designing we can see longitudinal steel, shear reinforcement etc.. this is different for each section so how I can use these to select the bar reqirement, spacing e.t.c as we have one section plan for beam and column etc. but this is different for all sections so how I select this for column, beam et.c

even if a building is very regular like in ur example, you need to design for 2 sections; one for internal (beam, col & foundation) and another for external. Now all the internal beams having same span and loading etc shall have same moments and reinforcement. if not then something is wrong. But in ur example you have different spans in x and y so yes you each beam will have different reinforcement. but for simplicity you can use the reinforcement of the beam having maximum values and apply for all beams provided if it can be accomodated in all beams (after checking min and max reinf)

what about slab?? Its reinforcement etc..

Slabs are designed in SAFE not in etabs..but if the slab is shell you can check the moments and calculate reinf manually but this can be done only for SHELL areas not membrane.

I used property modifiers and other tips also which I found on this site so kindly guide me.

First of all you used modifiers in section properties..i would not recommend you to follow this approach...what i do is to select all beams before running my model and goto ASSIGN>FRAME>MODIFIERS and apply it...second you didnt apply torsion modifiers...

Details of the building r as follows.

4-story building

X-direction spacing = 6 @10 feet

Y-direction spacing =2 @20 feet

One way slab

Load is assigned using Shell/area loads ( I selected all panels of one story then applied the shell/area load dead, live et.c then for next story) but the load is not fully transferred to column etc, why? After analyzing the stress diagram looks odd to me.

you need to understand here the basic concepts of shell and membrane..how they behave in etabs...your system is one way slab supported by beams all around..so why you are using shell assignment in slabs? You should use membrane so the load is transferred to beams by tributary area...(as you do manually..thats why i told you to do it manual before doing it on etabs)...anyway...you can still design beams with shell slabs with a fine meshing..but at this stage you shoud have considered membrane slabs...it will be more realsitic to your manual calculations. You applied shell slabs so the load is transfered to four corners points and going to columns in form of axial loads...if you goto DISPLAY>SHOW LOADS>FRAME you will see that the options are disabled because etabs is unable to show you transferred loading...because you didnt apply membrane..

Rcc wall is used in basement. Auto meshing is done 4x4

I dont know why you applied wall modifiers equal to 0.1..this is too much cracked section...apply only m11 and m22 = 0.7 here in your example...try to get concept about cracking of various structural elements...

Seismic effect is not taken into account so only one load combo is used. I deleted the others but after analysis they were shown why??

Dont worry about other load combinations they are automatically generated...but you should check what combinations you are including in your design...it will design only on the combinations which you have slected in DESIGN>CONCRETE FRAME>SELECT DESIGN COMBOS....

How I will know that any member is failing and I need to change it??

Your members are having green color after designing..it means they are all passed..if any member fails it shows RED color...for that you need to change the sections or investigate other matters with that beam or col etc...

In final design we show the bar, spacing, etc but as I mentioned it is change for every sections so how I should finalize this for column beam and what for rcc wall?? After analysis it looks like that no load is transferred to it..

Like for slabs...walls moments shall be read manually on specific load combinations...and designed for reinforcement..or you can assign it pier labels...

Kindly check this model by performing manual checks on it. Waiting for ur response.

I have applied corrections to your model..please download this and use it..but as i said....design this simple case your self manually...and compare...

want to learn from ur experience :)

thanks in advance :)

You are always welcome...

some more comments:-

dont apply raft in your etabs model..export the reactions to SAFE and model raft there...or if you want to model it in etabs..then dont apply fixed supports..apply area springs according to your soil properties...in your model i have removed the raft...

you applied PLATE option for RAFT..but you should be familiar with the differences between MEMBRANE, PLATE and SHELL...

This time i have applied modifiers according to your approach...( inside frame section properties..) now you should not select the beams or cols and goto ASSING>FRAME>MODIFIERS...dont apply it again..otherwise it will be duplicated and etabs will multiply both values...i mean if you applied inside 0.25 and then from menu again 0.25 so it will consider 0.25x0.25

remember i have changed your slabs to MEMBRANE..so no need to apply meshing to MEMBRANE...also before designing your sections select sway ordinary as in your case the frame is not sway frame...

still i didnt applied manual checks..you should do it your self...calculate the tributary area of any column and multiply by load..and see if your base reaction for that column is okay or not? check the loading of a beam manually and compare with etabs...

calculate the moments of any frame on a grid by ACI 8.3 approx coefficients method and compare...or you can moment redistribution methid,,,

now u must be thinking how hard struc engg...makes the life... :P

my version is 9.7.4 so im attaching only text file..import it in your etabs model...

good luck

assignment_checked.zip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sir first of all thnks for replying in that much detail. and yes i have started this so inshALLAH it will keep this going. and i am in my final year 7th smstr. i am also doing this manually and i want to compare it with etabs for that reason i am doing it in etabs but i can compare it when i will do it correctly in etabs so thats why i shared it here so that i came to know how to do it correctly as if i dont do it correclty then results will not match.

u pointed alot of things and i have started working on it but its really very difficult :) after reading about different thing here on SEFP i came to know that i knows nothing about structurl engrg :P its very tought..

one of our teacher taught us about this so i did it in that way plus other help taken from differnt soucres and i am combining that all so thats why there r mistakes about applying modifiers, assigng slab as shell etc .

sir i have noted these all and also doing it manually nd will return back after that with more questions :P

thnks again 4 ur time :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • Hi there,
      I am interested in performing "Performance Based Design" for a 20 story building. 
      I'll be performing "Non-Linear Static Pushover Analysis" for my model. Until now, I have decided to go with "Displacement Co-efficient method". I will be using ETABS 2017 for performing Pushover Analysis. While assigning plastic hinges, I have an option of using ASCE 41-17 (Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing buildings". I would like to know what would be a better estimate for relative distances for plastic hinges in case of beams, columns. Any input concerning assignment of hinges to beams, columns and shear walls is highly appreciated. Normally it's taken 0.05 and 0.95 or 0.1 and 0.9. What's your opinion on this?
      Secondly, it would be great if someone can recommend me a book or some good source to understand how to characterize building using performance levels. Any sort of help is appreciated.
      I have recently graduated and joined a structural design firm, so kindly guide me, considering me a beginner.

       
      • 2 replies
    • *SEFP Consistent Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Pile Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Doc No: 10-00-CD-0007*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Date: April 16, 2018*

      1.1. FUNCTION OF JOINT

      Beam-column joint must transfer the forces, such as moment, shear and torsion, transferred by the beam to the column so that the structure can maintain its integrity to carry loads for which it is designed.

      Another function of the beam-column joint is to help the structure to dissipate seismic forces so that it can behave in a ductile manner.

      1.2.WHY DO WE CARE

      During an extreme seismic event, the code-based structure is expected to maintain its load-carrying capacity for gravity loads even after the structure deforms into inelastic range so that it does not pose any life safety hazard. Hence, the joint can go through significant degradation of strength and stiffness, and if it fails in shear, or anchorage, the life-safety objective of code cannot be achieved.

      1.3.CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE


      1.4.THINGS TO CONSIDER FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      Longitudinal bars of beams, or slab, must be able to develop their yield stress, so that the beam/slab can transfer moment to joint. It means that longitudinal bars must have adequate development length for hooked bars. This implies that the size of the column must be such that bars can develop their tensile forces. If bars can transfer moment, they can also transfer shear as far as monolithic construction is concerned.


      The shear strength of the joint must enable the transfer of moment and shear through it.



      The joint should be Constructible: Congestion of reinforcement is the main concern.

      1.5.DESIGN SHEAR FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      The design shear for beam-column joint depends upon the relative strength of beam and column at the joint.

       
      • 4 replies
    • *Comments/Observations regarding modelling in ETABS*

      *Doc No: 10-00-CD-0006*

      *Date: May 06, 2017*

      Some of the observations made during extraction of results from ETABS (v 9.7.4), for design of reinforced concrete members, are being share in this article.,

      1) Minimum Eccentricity

      ETABS always considers the minimum eccentricity for selecting the design moment of columns irrespective of the probable behavior of the column, whether short or long column. See section 10.10.6.5 and its commentary of ACI 318-08 which deals with minimum eccentricity of long columns. You should always check the design moments that ETABS uses for columns if you want to bring down the cost of construction.

      2) Unbraced/ Braced Preference

      ETABS always performs analysis of frame as if it is un-braced. You should investigate if the storey under consideration is braced, or un-braced (10.10.5.2), and decide appropriate design moments of columns.

      3) Time Period

      ETABS has a tendency to select a time period of the building that is considerably less than the value obtained by the approximate method, Method A, of the section 1630.2.2  of UBC 97. To quote the FEMA 451 document: ''Because this formula is based on lower bound regression analysis of measured building response in California, it will generally result in periods that are lower (hence, more conservative for use in predicting base shear) than those computed from a more rigorous mathematical model". So, there is no need to use the value of time period that is lot less than Ta. One should always check the time period used by the software; ETABS can overestimate the seismic force by more than 2 times.

      Visit the forum link to read the complete article.
      Link: http://www.sepakistan.com/topic/2300-commentsobservations-regarding-modelling-in-etabs/
      • 0 replies
    • The minimum amount and spacing of reinforcement to be used in structural floors, roof slabs, and walls for control of temperature and shrinkage cracking is given in ACI 318 or in ACI 350R. The minimum-reinforcement percentage, which is between 0.18 and 0.20%, does not normally control cracks to within generally acceptable design limits. To control cracks to a more acceptable level, the percentage requirement needs to exceed about 0.60% (REFRENCE ACI COMMITE REPORT 224R-01)



       

       



       

       

      So according to above statement , should we follow 0.60%, to be on more safe side??



       
      • 12 replies
    • Dear Sir/Madam,

      This email is an invitation for the participation in the First South Asia Conference on Earthquake Engineering (SACEE-2019) which will be held on 21-22 February 2019 in Karachi, Pakistan. This conference is the inaugural event in this series of conferences which has been constituted under the auspices of South Asia Earthquake Network (SHAKE). The organisers of the conference include NED University, University of Porto, University of Fuzhou, University Roma Tre and Institution of Engineers Pakistan. The conference website can be visited at http://sacee.neduet.edu.pk/.

      Please note that world leading earthquake engineering experts have confirmed their participation in the conference. These include Prof Abdelkrim Aoudia (Italy), Prof Alper Ilki (Turkey), Dr Amod Mani Dixit (Nepal), Prof Bruno Briseghella (Italy), Prof George Mylonakis (UK), Prof Khalid Mosalam (USA), Prof Humberto Varum (Portugal) and many others. The presence of these distinguished experts allows you to exchange your work/issues with them and discuss possibility of any future collaboration. Please note that participation in the conference is strictly based on registration. Early registration in different categories at reduced rates are available till 10 December 2018. Please visit the conference website to see the details and the link for registration.

      If there are any queries, please do not hesitate to contact the Conference Secretary at the following address

      Prof. Muhammad Masood Rafi
      Conference Secretary- SACEE-2019
      Chairman
      Department of Earthquake Engineering
      NED University of Engineering & Technology Karachi, Pakistan.
      Phone: 0092-21-992-261261 Ext:2605
      Email: rafi-m@neduet.edu.pk
    • What is the Minimum reinforcement For Precast Pile  according to different codes (ACI,BS)??  Pile length is 40 times of pile least dimension . 
      • 1 reply
    • Dear members, I am working on a 10 storied rcc factory building with one basement,  where floor loads are in general 125 psf(Live) . but there are 2 warehouse in the building at ground floor & 10th floor where the Live load of stacked materials are 450psf. I have modeled it and analysed in ETABS. After analysis, seeing the floor displacement for seismic load,  i am in big shock to see the pattern. the displacement pattern suddenly increased hugely & then got normal . if the warehouse load created problem, then why it effected only Ground floor level, not the 10th floor! Please tell me how can i solve it. 
      • 1 reply
    • Asalamualaikum all,

      I have columns which are conflicting with the underground water tank as shown in figure.
       

      So I have decided to make underground water tank base slab as a footing for column. So I import etabs model to safe and just take uniform water load on base slab and point load from columns.

      This is the residential house. The BC is 2tsf. But SAFE is showing tension on the base slab and the thickness from punching is 30''. I believe that thickness is too high. What can be the error? Is this approach is correct for design base slab of ugwt to carry load of two edge columns?
      • 11 replies
    • SAFE perform iterative uplift analysis,any one having experience how to check the results of this analysis???what is the purpose and scope of this analysis???
      • 15 replies
    • Shear wall design
      AOA 

      i am facing problems in shear wall design .what are the pier and spandral ?what will be the difference when we assign pier or spandral? without assigning these the shear wall design is incomplete .

      i am taking about etabsv16

      someone have document about shear wall design plz provide it 

      thank you

       
      • 13 replies
  • Tell a friend

    Love Structural Engineering Forum Of Pakistan? Tell a friend!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.