Jump to content
  • Welcome to SEFP!

    Welcome!

    Welcome to our community forums, full of great discussions about Structural Engineering. Please register to become a part of our thriving group or login if you are already registered.

Sign in to follow this  
Rana

Raft Modifier

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Rana Waseem said:

What could be the purpose of reducing raft stiffness by 60% (m11=m22=m12 modifiers of 0.4) in SAFE Model?

I have worked with some engineers that like to assign high stiffness modifiers to rafts to get conservative flexural and shear design of foundation. Assigning modifiers would increase amount of rebar in your raft.  I personally think that this is good practice as nothing is perfectly rigid and cracking in inevitable, which would result in loss of inertia and high flexural stresses.

The general procedure is to create two models. One with no stiffness modifiers and one with modifiers for foundation/ raft. You should use the first model to calculate piles reactions and the second to do flexural and shear design. 

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Our picks

    • *SEFP Consistent Design*<br style="color:#272a34">*Pile Design*<br style="color:#272a34">*Doc No: 10-00-CD-0005*<br style="color:#272a34">*Date: Nov 21, 2017*<br style="color:#272a34">
       

      This article is intended to cover design of piles using Ultimate Limit State (ULS) method. The use of ULS method is fairly new for geotechnical design (last decade). The method is being used in multiple countries now (Canada, Australia etc). The following items shall be discussed:

      Overview


      Geotechnical Design of Piles (Compression Loads, Tension Loads and Lateral Loads)


      Structural Design of Piles (Covering both Concrete and Steel)


      Connection of Pile with the foundation (Covering both Concrete and Steel)


      Pile Group Settlement


      Things to consider



       

      1. Overview

      Piles provide a suitable load path to transfer super-structure loads to foundation where shallow foundation are not suitable - this can be due to a number of reasons like existing space constraints or suitable soil strata is not present immediately below structure. Other uses can be to meet design requirements like to have reduced settlement etc.

      This article shall cover the use of straight shaft cast-in-place concrete piles and straight shaft driven steel pipe piles. There are a number of additional piles types like belled concrete piles, precast concrete piles, screw / helical steel piles etc but the discussion to choose a suitable pile type is not in the intended scope of this article. The article is intended  to discuss design requirements for straight shaft piles only (both concrete and steel) . The aforementioned topic about pile selection is a very diverse subject and requires a separate discussion on its own.

      Click on the link to read the full article.
       
      • 9 replies
    • I am suppose to design a pile foundation for a machine weighing approximately 50 tons and with an operational loading of 100 tons. 
      I ll appreciate your help in terms of guidance & provision of notes...  
       
      Thank you..
      • 36 replies
    • Material behavior can be idealized as consisting of an 'elastic' domain and a 'plastic' domain. For almost 200 years, structural design has been
      based on an elastic theory which assumes that structures display a linear response throughout their loading history, ignoring the post-yielding
      stage of behavior. Current design practice for reinforced concrete structures is a curious blend of elastic analysis to compute forces and moments, plasticity theory to proportion cross-sections for the moment and axial, load, and empirical mumbo-jumbo to proportion members for shear.

       

      From the book "Design of Concrete Structures with Stress Fields" by A. Muttoni,  J. Schwartz and  B.Thurliman.

       
      • 0 replies
    • Dear Fellow Researchers, Academicians, and research students,

       

      NED University of Engineering & Technology in collaboration with Institution of Engineers Pakistan (IEP) is organizing 9th International Civil Engineering Conference (ICEC 2017) on December 22-23, 2017 at Karachi, Pakistan.

       The congress details are available at its website www.neduet.edu.pk/icec

       Also attached is congress flyer for information and dissemination among your peers.

       Abstracts submission deadline has been extended till October 31, 2017.

      Please click on the link to see the full description.
      • 0 replies
    • AoA all,

      Is it mandatory to do column concreting upto the soffit of the beam in a single pour ?

      What code says about the construction/cold joint location in column ?

      Majority of the contractors are pouring the column concrete upto the soffit of the beam (full height of the column), some contractors leave the column height about 9" to 12" below the beam level and then fill this 9" to 12" column height with the beams & slab concreting. On one site column concreting was stopped at the mid height and the remaining half was filled on the next day.

      Thanks

       

       
      • 5 replies
    • AOA 

      i am facing problems in shear wall design .what are the pier and spandral ?what will be the difference when we assign pier or spandral? without assigning these the shear wall design is incomplete .

      i am taking about etabsv16

      someone have document about shear wall design plz provide it 

      thank you

       
      • 9 replies
    • Salam Members,

      Congratulations to Engineers, PEC has become full signatory of Washington Accord, what are the benefits to Pakistani engineers for this agreement. 

       

      Regards   

       

       
      • 3 replies
    • Please clarify the following confusions one by one:-

       

      1. If we run P-delta analysis in ETABS, then should we ignore stiffness property modifiers for beams and columns? I have heard that if we perform P-delta analysis and apply stiffness modifiers at the same time then the moment magnification process is doubled...?

       

      2. ETABS considers selenderness of a column by applying moment magnification factors. If we run P-delta analysis also, does it mean that the selenderness of column is being over-estimated? I mean once the moments are magnified in P-delta analysis process and again through moment magnification process?

       

      Please help me understand the software myth and clarify above confusions.
      • 1 reply
    • Assalam o alaikum.
      According to ACI 12.5.2,
      development length for fc' = 3000, fy=60000, for normal weight concrete and epoxy less reinforcement, The required development length comes out to be
      for #3 = 8.2 inch
      for #4 = 10.95 inch
      for #6 = 16.42 inch
      for #8 = 21.9 inch
       
      And if in my case, ACI 12.5.3 is not fulfilled, it means now i have to provide ldh as mentioned above. ldh is STRAIGHT EMBEDMENT LENGTH + RADIUS OF BEND + ONE BAR DIAMETER as shown in figure attached. Now my question is, if in my case, main reinforcement of beam is of #6 and #4, minimum column size required will be 18 inch and 12 inch respectively. Lets say by any means, i can not select #4, #3 bars and size of column where bars are to be terminated is 12 inch, how to fullfil this development length???
      • 11 replies
    • Dear all,

      I am trying to design shearwalls through ETABS with temperature load applied over shell. At various location, spandral section fails in Shear due to temperature and piers (sometime in shear, mostly in flexure).  (See Attached Image)

      Certainly all the problem in Shearwalls are due to temperature. I don't want to increase cross section of spandral or pier at some location just due to temperature load case as it will appears non-uniform with rest of the wall. 

      I have seen stiffness modifier affect distribution of forces and also rigid/semi rigid daiphragm assumption. 

       

      Can anybody guide how to properly design the shear wall with temperature load applied in ETABS or share any similar experience. Thanks in Advance.    
      • 15 replies
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Leomessi90
      Hello every one
      i modeled a flat plate with SAFE and after i run the analysis i got different results when i compare FEM with strip Forces for both M11 and M22
      these is so much different .
       
      one more thing  , i solved the same example with direct design method and when i compare it with Strip forces from SAFE there are good agreement , but when i compare it with FEM result by SAFE there are big differences !!
      does any one have information
      thanks


    • By Ahsan Kazmi
      Kindly recommend articles or books regarding the basics of the these softwares. Mainly describing the user interface, tools and some practical examples.  
    • By Fatima Al Zahraa Olleik
      Salam Alaykom All,
      I am modeling a refugee camp on Etabs. I have over 20 buildings to be modeled, each 5 share the same raft foundation , and each raft foundation is no more than 3 meters away from the other. For simplicity I modeled all 20 buildings in the same Etabs Model to Calculate the forces on the raft foundations. My question is :
      1_ Will the  Raft Foundations be Affected by each other , knowing that the buildings they support arent connected in any way?
       
    • By Abdullah Anjum
      I need help regarding MAT footing design in safe. Please read questions mentioned below and comment if any extra step or correction need to be done. This MAT footing is for 4 storey building in zone 2A and bearing capacity would be more than 1.25 ton/sft.
       
      1) Does we need to increase the bearing capacity by 33% as mentioned in NILSON book for soil pressure calculation or not if we are taking basic load combinations of UBC including earthquake loads not the alternative load combinations.
       
      2) If we want to take reduced live load for footing then is there any way to export in form of reactions from Etabs to safe. In my opinion Etabs does not give Reduced live load reaction, Correct me if I am wrong.
       
      3) When we use the basic load combinations which include earthquake load then there is very localized uplift (due to earthquake combo) when we check soil pressure. is it normal or something wrong with my reactions. If it is normal then we always used non-linear basic combinations to check soil pressure and non-linear design combinations for design of raft?
       
      4) Does it required to check crack width and settlement in case of raft or not. If required then explain in few words.
       
      5) At boundary of raft where there are shear walls/lift core, soil pressure is more than the bearing capacity in these localized regions. what we need to overcome this situation if we cannot increase the area of raft at that side.
       
      any additional check  which you think important for design then write in comment
       
      your help would be appreciated
       
      Regards
    • By Ahsan Kazmi
      I have modeled B+G+6 story in etabs and exported its base with 9" thick and 12 feet high  RCC wall with option (export floor loads plus column and wall distortion). In Safe initially i defined raft and soil support properties. after analysis the minimum soil pressure was out range (7 ksf) while my allowable limit was 2.25ksf. Then i selected all the joint points of wall and assigned them fix supports the soil pressure suddenly reduced to almost zero value. Question is that which strategy of modeling is correct? Secondly when we export wall from etabs to safe its property changes to beam why this happens?
      Model is attached below.
      Raft 12.FDB
    • By Ahsan Kazmi
      How to check the soil pressures in SAFE? What is difference between min and max pressures? and what is allowable limit?
    • By saleem khan
      Assalam-u-alikum  
      for modeling raft foundation in etabs the supports for raft is point spring or area springs support?How i will assign value to a spring?
    • By Waqas Haider
      Assalam o alaikum,
      I am having a building with a semi circle shape. None of the footing is either parallel to global X-axis nor to the global Y-axis. The plan of footings is attached. The problem I am facing is, ETABS reports joint reactions along global X-axis and global Y-axis instead of along the local axes of column. Since my columns are at a degree to global axis, the joint reactions also becomes at a degree from column and footing. Since to use simple combined stress formula of 
      stress = P/A + Mx*Y/Ix + My*X/Iy 
      I need forces along axis of footing. Or i will have to resolve either moment of inertia of footing along direction of forces or vice versa, which is quite tough and time taking. The other option I can go for is to design footing in SAFE. But again here, there i dont find any option to rotate footing at a certain degree to match orientation of columns. If i rotate local axis of footing, It only rotates its local axes and meshing but not the footing physically itself. The orientation of footing remains same. How can i solve this problem? Either having reactions in etabs along local axes of columns can solve my issue so that i can design it manually or rotating footing in safe to match local axes of columns can solve my issue. So can any one guide me how to do either option? Thanks.
    • By kHURRAM ALI
      aslamwalekum , when we design reinforced concrete elements , for beam we take 0.35 , for column and wall we take 0.7 and for slabs we take 0.25 as modifiers , but i read in aci that for servicibilty analysis these modifiers has to increase by 43% which means for beam it become 0.5 , for column and shear walls it become 1.0 and for slab it become 0.35 , by doing this model drift and deflection both reduce to almost half of its original value.
       
      one thing more when we do manual check we dont take crack sections , for e.g for simply supported beam the deflection is 5\384 WL^4\EI , here the I (inertia ) is not the for the crack section ,its for the uncracked section , so what modifiers should be use 0.35 or 0.5 or 1.0
  • Recent Discussions

  • Latest Forum and Club Posts

    • @ali7988 hameed.. I think you want to apply partition wall load on floor slab, for this purpose you can simply draw a null/negligible frame element and apply load over it.
    • Sorry, I m not sure what you meant. You don't need to include a member in the model just to add its load. You need to model only those members that are essential for completing the load path (structural members).
    • Looking at the figure, one cannot figure out the complete load path for a particular loading scenario. So, it is not possible to give a specific advice. But, the way these pipes are connected, there be moment due to the eccentricity of connections in addition to axial forces. In addition to axial and flexural stress, shear stresses can also dictate the thickness required for the pipe, if the load path includes these forces.
    • Assalamualaikum,  Im designing a connection a pipe to pipe, between this pipe i have to add a plate to connect the pipe with welds. How can i determine the thickness of the pipe? Do i just design it based on tension load on the pipe? Cause my senior said that theres an eccentricity and i have to design it to resist such loads, but im not sure. Heres the figure of the drawing. Regards Groszni
    • do you calculate the dimension of the stiffner as a tension member by using these load-> required load for stiffener = force load by beam flage - column web resistance ?
    • Please see these topics: http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=347923 http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=1734 Thanks.
    • W/s Imran, It is very hard to say if your FYP would help you in securing a job but one thing that is for sure, is that you will get skills like assessing an existing structure, doing base isolation and information about seismic codes and the response of a building to a seismic event - such skills would help you wherever you go. I am not aware of use of base isolators in Pakistan, there might be sensitive military installations where these are being used but I don't know if the market is really big for that and there is immediate need for people having that experience. But like I said above, you will get a skillset that any structural firm in Pakistan would value provided you do your project correct and develop understanding of what you are doing. Thanks.    
    • Can I model the load of partion load(brick wall load) by modeling a beam with very small dimensions such as 1 cm * cm
    • @UmarMakhzumi.. @Ayesha...Thank You for your concern. Yes we r on the same page . However my interest was only to highlight the fact that pile cap design is not like slab, due to pile spacing criteria and typical patterns, it will behave like a deep beam in almost every structure. However i feel there is no proper technical inputs on this component of structure and engineers follows whatever practices are in their offices. In this regard i would like to add little knowledge as per my experience , that unlike the normal slab, the critical sections for maximum FORCES will also be changed , it needs 5 to 6 special investigation as per the reference handbook mentioned in commentary of ACI.  Regards  
    • @ZOHAIB SATTAR NAGRA..  Applying temperature to vertical elements (Wall) will hardly effect your design, this is my observation.      "It is pertinent to mention that biggest trouble for frames/walls will arise due to the application of temperature loading on slab area".  
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.