Jump to content
  • Welcome to SEFP!


    Welcome to our community forums, full of great discussions about Structural Engineering. Please register to become a part of our thriving group or login if you are already registered.

Sign in to follow this  

Raft Modifier

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Rana Waseem said:

What could be the purpose of reducing raft stiffness by 60% (m11=m22=m12 modifiers of 0.4) in SAFE Model?

I have worked with some engineers that like to assign high stiffness modifiers to rafts to get conservative flexural and shear design of foundation. Assigning modifiers would increase amount of rebar in your raft.  I personally think that this is good practice as nothing is perfectly rigid and cracking in inevitable, which would result in loss of inertia and high flexural stresses.

The general procedure is to create two models. One with no stiffness modifiers and one with modifiers for foundation/ raft. You should use the first model to calculate piles reactions and the second to do flexural and shear design. 


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Our picks

    • Hi guys just to discuss with you my understanding of crack widths in Environmental structures according to ACI. 



      Normal structures



      1. ACI 318-95 based on statistical method of Gergely & Lutz 1968 limits Z based on exposure. We are calculating crack widths here. (Normal structures)


      2. ACI 318-99 proposed limiting the spacing and removed actually calculating the width and also removed the exposure conditions. For example for beams and one-way slabs s (in) = 540/fs -2.5cc or in other words limiting the fs=0.6fy  (For normal structures)


      3. ACI 224R-01 references method 1 and 2 above and 3 european codes.

      The most confusing part is the table in which Nawy suggests 0.1mm crack width for water-tight structures. The whole document is for normal structures except this line. And people are following this line and refer to this document for water tight structures. I mean its just a suggestion and by the way this method 1 is obsolete now since ACI 318-99 (see point 2 above).



      Water tight structures



      1. ACI 318-08 states clearly that for watertight structures ACI 350-06 codes should be used. 


      2. ACI 224.4R-13 also specifically states that for watertight structures walls in section 7.4, we should use ACI 350-06. 


      3. ACI 350-06 for water tight structures does not recommend calculating a number for crack width but rather limiting max steel stress in bars to be 20k ksi or fs=0.33fy for normal conditions.



      To sum it up, 


      Philosophy of crack width control is not to calculate probable crack widths but to limit the max stress in steel bars.


      For normal structures: fs=0.6fy and for water tight structures fs=0.33fy
      • 1 reply
    • Hi

      I want to know the use of diaphragms in etabs. i discus many people who are use etabs but i can't get justified answer about the application of etabs.

      I read the Technical reference  of  Etabs, where they write about Diaphragms. i get two type of diaphragms (plate or shell and joint or beam). 

      My question.

      1. When do i use Shell diaphragms (if floor present ) 

      2.When do i use joint diaphragms ( grade beam level where no slab are provide) 


      NB: Diaphragms use to transfer the lateral load to the resisting element ( frame such as column. beam,shear wall) 
      • 2 replies
    • *SEFP Consistent Design*<br style="color:#272a34">*Pile Design*<br style="color:#272a34">*Doc No: 10-00-CD-0005*<br style="color:#272a34">*Date: Nov 21, 2017*<br style="color:#272a34">

      This article is intended to cover design of piles using Ultimate Limit State (ULS) method. The use of ULS method is fairly new for geotechnical design (last decade). The method is being used in multiple countries now (Canada, Australia etc). The following items shall be discussed:


      Geotechnical Design of Piles (Compression Loads, Tension Loads and Lateral Loads)

      Structural Design of Piles (Covering both Concrete and Steel)

      Connection of Pile with the foundation (Covering both Concrete and Steel)

      Pile Group Settlement

      Things to consider


      1. Overview

      Piles provide a suitable load path to transfer super-structure loads to foundation where shallow foundation are not suitable - this can be due to a number of reasons like existing space constraints or suitable soil strata is not present immediately below structure. Other uses can be to meet design requirements like to have reduced settlement etc.

      This article shall cover the use of straight shaft cast-in-place concrete piles and straight shaft driven steel pipe piles. There are a number of additional piles types like belled concrete piles, precast concrete piles, screw / helical steel piles etc but the discussion to choose a suitable pile type is not in the intended scope of this article. The article is intended  to discuss design requirements for straight shaft piles only (both concrete and steel) . The aforementioned topic about pile selection is a very diverse subject and requires a separate discussion on its own.

      Click on the link to read the full article.
      • 9 replies
    • I am suppose to design a pile foundation for a machine weighing approximately 50 tons and with an operational loading of 100 tons. 
      I ll appreciate your help in terms of guidance & provision of notes...  
      Thank you..
      • 36 replies
    • Material behavior can be idealized as consisting of an 'elastic' domain and a 'plastic' domain. For almost 200 years, structural design has been
      based on an elastic theory which assumes that structures display a linear response throughout their loading history, ignoring the post-yielding
      stage of behavior. Current design practice for reinforced concrete structures is a curious blend of elastic analysis to compute forces and moments, plasticity theory to proportion cross-sections for the moment and axial, load, and empirical mumbo-jumbo to proportion members for shear.


      From the book "Design of Concrete Structures with Stress Fields" by A. Muttoni,  J. Schwartz and  B.Thurliman.

      • 0 replies
    • Dear Fellow Researchers, Academicians, and research students,


      NED University of Engineering & Technology in collaboration with Institution of Engineers Pakistan (IEP) is organizing 9th International Civil Engineering Conference (ICEC 2017) on December 22-23, 2017 at Karachi, Pakistan.

       The congress details are available at its website www.neduet.edu.pk/icec

       Also attached is congress flyer for information and dissemination among your peers.

       Abstracts submission deadline has been extended till October 31, 2017.

      Please click on the link to see the full description.
      • 0 replies
    • AoA all,

      Is it mandatory to do column concreting upto the soffit of the beam in a single pour ?

      What code says about the construction/cold joint location in column ?

      Majority of the contractors are pouring the column concrete upto the soffit of the beam (full height of the column), some contractors leave the column height about 9" to 12" below the beam level and then fill this 9" to 12" column height with the beams & slab concreting. On one site column concreting was stopped at the mid height and the remaining half was filled on the next day.



      • 5 replies
    • AOA 

      i am facing problems in shear wall design .what are the pier and spandral ?what will be the difference when we assign pier or spandral? without assigning these the shear wall design is incomplete .

      i am taking about etabsv16

      someone have document about shear wall design plz provide it 

      thank you

      • 10 replies
    • Salam Members,

      Congratulations to Engineers, PEC has become full signatory of Washington Accord, what are the benefits to Pakistani engineers for this agreement. 




      • 3 replies
    • Please clarify the following confusions one by one:-


      1. If we run P-delta analysis in ETABS, then should we ignore stiffness property modifiers for beams and columns? I have heard that if we perform P-delta analysis and apply stiffness modifiers at the same time then the moment magnification process is doubled...?


      2. ETABS considers selenderness of a column by applying moment magnification factors. If we run P-delta analysis also, does it mean that the selenderness of column is being over-estimated? I mean once the moments are magnified in P-delta analysis process and again through moment magnification process?


      Please help me understand the software myth and clarify above confusions.
      • 1 reply
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Muti Ur Rehman
      Assalamu Aalikum,
      Hi, I am a new member. I have a plot measuring 30*70 feet. Most of houses being built here (in Rawalpindi) have masonry foundations (a pyramid of bricks on PCC or sometimes the PCC layer has three to four iron rods of size 3/8 or 4/8  in this "PCC" layer. I want to make a raft foundation instead of masonry foundation but the cost seems to be high. I want to ask if I make a raft  1 feet thick and put a single mesh of center to center distance  12 inch. Even this will cost more but if it gives more strength then I want to  go for this. Would such foundation more durable and strong?
    • By Saiful Islam Zaber
      How to model  mat on pile cap on SAFE ?  Does anyone have similar experience ? 
    • By Leomessi90
      Hello every one
      i modeled a flat plate with SAFE and after i run the analysis i got different results when i compare FEM with strip Forces for both M11 and M22
      these is so much different .
      one more thing  , i solved the same example with direct design method and when i compare it with Strip forces from SAFE there are good agreement , but when i compare it with FEM result by SAFE there are big differences !!
      does any one have information

    • By Ahsan Kazmi
      Kindly recommend articles or books regarding the basics of the these softwares. Mainly describing the user interface, tools and some practical examples.  
    • By Fatima Al Zahraa Olleik
      Salam Alaykom All,
      I am modeling a refugee camp on Etabs. I have over 20 buildings to be modeled, each 5 share the same raft foundation , and each raft foundation is no more than 3 meters away from the other. For simplicity I modeled all 20 buildings in the same Etabs Model to Calculate the forces on the raft foundations. My question is :
      1_ Will the  Raft Foundations be Affected by each other , knowing that the buildings they support arent connected in any way?
    • By Abdullah Anjum
      I need help regarding MAT footing design in safe. Please read questions mentioned below and comment if any extra step or correction need to be done. This MAT footing is for 4 storey building in zone 2A and bearing capacity would be more than 1.25 ton/sft.
      1) Does we need to increase the bearing capacity by 33% as mentioned in NILSON book for soil pressure calculation or not if we are taking basic load combinations of UBC including earthquake loads not the alternative load combinations.
      2) If we want to take reduced live load for footing then is there any way to export in form of reactions from Etabs to safe. In my opinion Etabs does not give Reduced live load reaction, Correct me if I am wrong.
      3) When we use the basic load combinations which include earthquake load then there is very localized uplift (due to earthquake combo) when we check soil pressure. is it normal or something wrong with my reactions. If it is normal then we always used non-linear basic combinations to check soil pressure and non-linear design combinations for design of raft?
      4) Does it required to check crack width and settlement in case of raft or not. If required then explain in few words.
      5) At boundary of raft where there are shear walls/lift core, soil pressure is more than the bearing capacity in these localized regions. what we need to overcome this situation if we cannot increase the area of raft at that side.
      any additional check  which you think important for design then write in comment
      your help would be appreciated
    • By Ahsan Kazmi
      I have modeled B+G+6 story in etabs and exported its base with 9" thick and 12 feet high  RCC wall with option (export floor loads plus column and wall distortion). In Safe initially i defined raft and soil support properties. after analysis the minimum soil pressure was out range (7 ksf) while my allowable limit was 2.25ksf. Then i selected all the joint points of wall and assigned them fix supports the soil pressure suddenly reduced to almost zero value. Question is that which strategy of modeling is correct? Secondly when we export wall from etabs to safe its property changes to beam why this happens?
      Model is attached below.
      Raft 12.FDB
    • By Ahsan Kazmi
      How to check the soil pressures in SAFE? What is difference between min and max pressures? and what is allowable limit?
    • By saleem khan
      for modeling raft foundation in etabs the supports for raft is point spring or area springs support?How i will assign value to a spring?
  • Recent Discussions

  • Latest Forum and Club Posts


Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.