Jump to content
  • Welcome to SEFP!

    Welcome!

    Welcome to our community forums, full of great discussions about Structural Engineering. Please register to become a part of our thriving group or login if you are already registered.

Recommended Posts

AOA 

i am facing problems in shear wall design .what are the pier and spandral ?what will be the difference when we assign pier or spandral? without assigning these the shear wall design is incomplete .

i am taking about etabsv16

someone have document about shear wall design plz provide it 

thank you

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Last month, i design a structure with shear walls. I will attach more documents. What i know/remember i will share with you.

In simple, Pier is similar to column and Spandrel is similar to beam. Shear wall is modeled in etabs as shell element. You are to assign it either pier label or spandrel label (Depending on situation of shear wall) to design a shear wall. If you want to design a shear wall, it mostly needs peir label to be assigned. But for the portions of shear wall above openings, as its behavior is somewhat like beam resting on two supports, you need to assign it a spandrel label. I have attached screen shots of my model where you can see i have assigned pier label to the vertical elements and i have assigned spandrel labels to the elements spaning horizontally above openings. The reason behind is detailing based. The detailing in vertical elements of shear wall is similar to wall (or column) and its design is based on considering it as an element resisting majorly AXIAL FORCES +  MOMENTS along with inplane shear forces. (Theoratically it acts as a cantilever beam spaning vertically which again represent behavoiur similar to column). I have also attached screen shot of design detail of pier which reports total vertical steel in wall with respect to section area for resisting moments, horizontal steel for resisting shear and some times boundry elemtns (i.e. special detailing at ends of shear wall exactly as in column i.e. shear rings confining vertical bars). I have also attached screen shot of design detail of spanderal which reports top steel, bottom steel, to resist moments similar to beam and vertical steel to resist shear along with DIAGONAL reinforcement some times needed to account for reversal of forces.

I will attach more documents throwing detailed light on shear wall design i found few weeks ago. Also my model is attached (it is in seismic zone 4 from where you can get idea about pier labeling and spanderal labeling)

One important thing is that, pier label and spanderal label also meant to integrate forces. i.e. if you assign same pier label to all walls in a floor connected with each other, the software will report results only for one and critical wall because all walls were assigned only one pier label. If you want to have multiple outputs at multiple walls, you should assign them different pier label.

in image number 5, note that i have not assigned any pier to the selected portion of wall. hence no reporting of results is done.

 

1.png

2.png

3.png

4.png

5.png

Etabs Center Portion.e2k

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

waqas one thing more i am working on plaza having shear wall.

so what type of mesh i used for slab and wall 

what is the role of edge constraints?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you for sharing this.

I have question about the box shape wall. shouldn't we assign the same pier to the wall that works together?

i have highlighted them in the attached Pic.  Furthermore, how do you draw this in Section designer considering having different pier label? 

2.png.5a32a3ffe7c32fcd287314f4c054f20e.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2017-06-23 at 4:11 PM, Arash Pursadrullah said:

I have question about the box shape wall. shouldn't we assign the same pier to the wall that works together?

The answer to your question is already in Waqas's posted reply above. However, I will elaborate it further. You can but there are benefits assigning different labels. For the above case, reinforcement would be reported separately for each wall segment which is extremely useful (and more practical) for detailing. Below is suggested Wall Pier and Spandrel Labelling scheme (Source: CSI Wiki).

Wall Pier Labelling Scheme

Figure%201.PNG?version=1&modificationDat

Wall Spandrel Labelling Scheme

image2017-4-11%2011:46:17.png?version=1&

On 2017-06-23 at 4:11 PM, Arash Pursadrullah said:

Furthermore, how do you draw this in Section designer considering having different pier label? 

You can easily draw this in Section Designer. The only catch is that if you are using the "Wall Stack" feature in ETABS, it automatically assigns the same pier label to all walls. To simply things, you can reassign walls new pier labels in that case.

 

On 2017-05-15 at 0:11 AM, farooqbro said:

so what type of mesh i used for slab and wall 

what is the role of edge constraints?

Use a regular mesh and always use edge restraints. The role of edge restraints is that they provide continuity to adjacent edges which is extremely useful for the case where meshing doesn't line up (as it can cause instability issues).

 Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello waqas.. i really appreciate your effort. Can you please put some light on the results window in order to have a clear understandings of interpretation of results....

i have confusion regarding the top steel and bottom steel in flexure results.. which steel is this result talking about ...

thanks

3.thumb.png.fbfd815bf4b7d3f5e92a2b31408c3c57.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Piers are designed at 2 locations. Top of story and bottom of story.  Also, FYI Etabs assigns pier labels with respect to story level so that is why the same pier label can be repeated on different levels.

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/24/2017 at 2:11 AM, Arash Pursadrullah said:

thank you for sharing this.

I have question about the box shape wall. shouldn't we assign the same pier to the wall that works together?

i have highlighted them in the attached Pic.  Furthermore, how do you draw this in Section designer considering having different pier label? 

2.png.5a32a3ffe7c32fcd287314f4c054f20e.png

This is absolutely wrong practice.

1. PIERS

Assign as per option a (See image posted by sir Makhzumi in previous reply)

Why didn't you apply pier to spandrels. Most people do not apply piers labels to spandrels. Give up on that.

Lets talk about this image. The top floor. Piers go horizontal with same number. 2 shells of P3, 2 shells of P2 and 2 shells of S1 should all have been defined as one pier.

Then P2 and P3 slender piers below them should be assigned different pier names separately.

Infact, as flexural deformations are dominant in these slender piers, divide them (mesh) into 4 pieces and assigned different pier to top 2 shells and different to bottom 2 shells (depends on the moment diagram though).

 

2. SPANDRELS

Assign as per option a (See image posted by sir Makhzumi in previous reply)

The spandrel I see in image is a deep beam. Isn't it? L/D < 4? If so, where is the meshing?

If its not a deep beam then apply different spandrel labels to each shell atleast in the middle for postive moment design.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Our picks

    • I am suppose to design a pile foundation for a machine weighing approximately 50 tons and with an operational loading of 100 tons. 
      I ll appreciate your help in terms of guidance & provision of notes...  
       
      Thank you..
      • 36 replies
    • Material behavior can be idealized as consisting of an 'elastic' domain and a 'plastic' domain. For almost 200 years, structural design has been
      based on an elastic theory which assumes that structures display a linear response throughout their loading history, ignoring the post-yielding
      stage of behavior. Current design practice for reinforced concrete structures is a curious blend of elastic analysis to compute forces and moments, plasticity theory to proportion cross-sections for the moment and axial, load, and empirical mumbo-jumbo to proportion members for shear.

       

      From the book "Design of Concrete Structures with Stress Fields" by A. Muttoni,  J. Schwartz and  B.Thurliman.

       
      • 0 replies
    • Dear Fellow Researchers, Academicians, and research students,

       

      NED University of Engineering & Technology in collaboration with Institution of Engineers Pakistan (IEP) is organizing 9th International Civil Engineering Conference (ICEC 2017) on December 22-23, 2017 at Karachi, Pakistan.

       The congress details are available at its website www.neduet.edu.pk/icec

       Also attached is congress flyer for information and dissemination among your peers.

       Abstracts submission deadline has been extended till October 31, 2017.

      Please click on the link to see the full description.
      • 0 replies
    • AoA all,

      Is it mandatory to do column concreting upto the soffit of the beam in a single pour ?

      What code says about the construction/cold joint location in column ?

      Majority of the contractors are pouring the column concrete upto the soffit of the beam (full height of the column), some contractors leave the column height about 9" to 12" below the beam level and then fill this 9" to 12" column height with the beams & slab concreting. On one site column concreting was stopped at the mid height and the remaining half was filled on the next day.

      Thanks

       

       
      • 5 replies
    • AOA 

      i am facing problems in shear wall design .what are the pier and spandral ?what will be the difference when we assign pier or spandral? without assigning these the shear wall design is incomplete .

      i am taking about etabsv16

      someone have document about shear wall design plz provide it 

      thank you

       
      • 9 replies
    • Salam Members,

      Congratulations to Engineers, PEC has become full signatory of Washington Accord, what are the benefits to Pakistani engineers for this agreement. 

       

      Regards   

       

       
      • 3 replies
    • Please clarify the following confusions one by one:-

       

      1. If we run P-delta analysis in ETABS, then should we ignore stiffness property modifiers for beams and columns? I have heard that if we perform P-delta analysis and apply stiffness modifiers at the same time then the moment magnification process is doubled...?

       

      2. ETABS considers selenderness of a column by applying moment magnification factors. If we run P-delta analysis also, does it mean that the selenderness of column is being over-estimated? I mean once the moments are magnified in P-delta analysis process and again through moment magnification process?

       

      Please help me understand the software myth and clarify above confusions.
      • 1 reply
    • Assalam o alaikum.
      According to ACI 12.5.2,
      development length for fc' = 3000, fy=60000, for normal weight concrete and epoxy less reinforcement, The required development length comes out to be
      for #3 = 8.2 inch
      for #4 = 10.95 inch
      for #6 = 16.42 inch
      for #8 = 21.9 inch
       
      And if in my case, ACI 12.5.3 is not fulfilled, it means now i have to provide ldh as mentioned above. ldh is STRAIGHT EMBEDMENT LENGTH + RADIUS OF BEND + ONE BAR DIAMETER as shown in figure attached. Now my question is, if in my case, main reinforcement of beam is of #6 and #4, minimum column size required will be 18 inch and 12 inch respectively. Lets say by any means, i can not select #4, #3 bars and size of column where bars are to be terminated is 12 inch, how to fullfil this development length???
      • 11 replies
    • Dear all,

      I am trying to design shearwalls through ETABS with temperature load applied over shell. At various location, spandral section fails in Shear due to temperature and piers (sometime in shear, mostly in flexure).  (See Attached Image)

      Certainly all the problem in Shearwalls are due to temperature. I don't want to increase cross section of spandral or pier at some location just due to temperature load case as it will appears non-uniform with rest of the wall. 

      I have seen stiffness modifier affect distribution of forces and also rigid/semi rigid daiphragm assumption. 

       

      Can anybody guide how to properly design the shear wall with temperature load applied in ETABS or share any similar experience. Thanks in Advance.    
      • 15 replies
    • ENGINEERS;
      I WILL LOOSE MY BRAIN FROM ETABS. 
      I DECIDED TO MAKE MANUAL MESHING FROM AREA ELEMENTS BESIDE EACH OTHER AND EVERY HING WAS FINE .
      BUT AFTER DEVISION SAY 7*7 ELEMNTS FOR EVERY BIG ELEMENT AND MAKING ETABS CHECH..................THEN 500 ERROR MESSAGE THAT ALL ELEMNTS ARE CLOSE TO EACH OTHER.  WHAT ARE GOING...... SOMEONE TELL ME PLEASE...... I WILL LOST MY WORK
      • 6 replies
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.