Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 06/15/21 in all areas

  1. You can measure the deflection by using a thread and putting it across the floor and then seeing if floor is lower than the thread. Anyway, if the reinforcement works, that's fine. If it doesn't you should retrofit the beam. Thanks.
    1 point
  2. Hooks are provided for to resist seismic movement. To prevent concrete from splitting outward. It prevent slippage of steel from the concrete. In Detailing book M. Y. H. Bangash .
    1 point
  3. Yes, surely the mechanics of force transfer makes the hook redundant if development length is available. Code's language also suggests the same; the have used the phrase " if hooks are required...".
    1 point
  4. Hi UmarMakhzumi, Thank you very much, your answer solved my question.
    1 point
  5. WSalaam, Cracking is not always bad. If J were you, I would re-check the design, get site reports on concrete strengths, confirm site placed rebars met development lengths and if all that works would let it go. Also other items you can do is to monitor deflection and get some NDT done if site information can’t be trusted. I am not sure about your comments on column orientation. Thanks.
    1 point
  6. Hi JL07, I don’t have any CSI softwares installed but a quick way would be to model a simple column with fixed base and apply a moment to it and see how reactions are reported. I assume the right hand rule is being followed for +ve values but that’s my guess.. Do let me know if that works. Thanks.
    1 point
  7. Salam, discussion is interesting, i have a query for my if raft is of 3ft or greater thickness, could rebars without bend can be used as the development length and embedment are satisfactory. Regards
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to Edmonton/GMT-06:00
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.