Jump to content
  • Welcome to SEFP!

    Welcome!

    Welcome to our community forums, full of great discussions about Structural Engineering. Please register to become a part of our thriving group or login if you are already registered.

Strap Beam In Raft For Columns Punching Shear Problem Counter


Yousuf Ali
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just draw a line element for punching. It will not calculate the punching and design shear reinforcement for beam for required forces. Otherwise just increase localized thickness under the column for punching. Its a common practice in raft construction.Top of these isolated footings and raft will be at one level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can anyone can tell me is that possible to provide strap beam in Raft for columns to counter punching shear of columns, if yes then how to do in SAFE? restriction on increasing Raft length and width.

Do design the raft for punching reinforcement if you cant provide enough thickness. Just because you have detailed a portion of raft as a beam doesn't mean it will behave as beam. Such concepts are a total misconception. Similarly, a lot of people go for 'concealed beams' in slabs which is totally useless. Like Rana said, increase your thickness locally or design it accordingly.

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assalam-o-alaikum!

 

Punching shear in raft footings, is often tackled by providing thicker slab portions under heavy loaded columns, as already mentioned in previous posts.

 

Generally length and width of raft can be increased suitably keeping in view allowable soil bearing capacity, provided space is available. However, in many cases this area extension might not be possible beyond the outer faces of exterior columns (being at the property line).

 

 

Regards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@ Sir Rana and umar, incresing localized thickness under coulmn u mean i increase raft thickness from 0.7m currently to beyond may be 1m.. But, by doing this there comes -ve moment over column which should be +ve over otherwise...Dont understand...only punching problem is on Edge columns near the periphery...can i show u picture possible?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assalam-o-alaikum!

 

If you want to get to-the-point advice, you should provide some basic information about your structure (like building type, number of stories, bay spacing, seismic design category etc.)  along with some sketch, to understand the situation and nature of problem.

 

Regards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

regarding locallized thickness increment, i am very much confused. I have done this. I drew a slab of 9" thickness with column size of 24". I decided to increase thickness in critical zone upto 24" and hence my critical perimeter would be at a distance of d/2 (22.5/2 = 11.25 inch) from face of column. But i tried, for the sake of checking, for 24" square column, i just drew another slab of dimensions 2.1ft x 2.1ft. Now it does not even cross d/2 critical section but SAFE takes effective depth for 22.5 inch. I was studing SAFE MANUAL titles "SAFE KEY FEATURES AND TERMINOLOGIES" where in section 6.3, in SLAB PUNCHING SHEAR CHECK, point 2, says,

"Check that each slab element in the area enclosed between the face of the column and the critical section for punching shear has the same slab property label.  If this is not the case, the minimum slab thickness within the punching shear perimeter is used.  "
 
Now I m confused, SAFE should take effective depth 7.5 inch instead of 22.5 inch because i have not provided 24" till d/2. My version is 12.3.1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Yousaf

You will not increase entire raft thickness. Just draw a raft of minimum thickness. I dont know why you require 0.7m thickness. It could be only 350mm. After having drawn this, draw isolated foundations over the already existing raft foundation slab. Make its thickness as per punching requirements. May be 1m. At the edges or peripheries you could increase the raft thickness to 0.7m but inside 350mm should work for usual loading. Yes please provide the sketch.

 

@Waqas

I did not get what are you trying to say. You are talking about slab or foundation? In slabs you provide drop panels for punching and negative moment and invert this for foundations and you get localized footings with raft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yousuf!

 

Click on 'More Reply Options' button, provided at bottom right corner of 'Reply to this topic' window, before writing your post.

 

A new window, with 'Attach files' option provided below the window, will appear. Now, you may write your post, and attach your files as well.

 

Regards.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks uzair bhai... here it is plz reply me the dimension of one span is 11.4 m along x-axis and 4m along Y-axis....all are rectangular columns..design need for raft? periphery columns having punching problem.

post-378-0-50571300-1423592511_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am designing a footing of column for seismic loads. Is it permissible to increase the allowable soil bearing capacity by 30% for seismic design of footing? Can anyone provide me with book or code reference?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am designing a footing of column for seismic loads. Is it permissible to increase the allowable soil bearing capacity by 30% for seismic design of footing? Can anyone provide me with book or code reference?

please check this topic

http://www.sepakistan.com/topic/61-33-increase-in-bearing-capacity-in-transient-load-condition/#entry808

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Calculations are okay. You are calculating punching as corner columns. So you end up with less bo. For edge columns you should select edge columns while calculating punching. 

Either increase the raft thickness or column size or try reducing moments at edge/corner columns by changing the system or may be all of these three options. At the end you need more bo.d.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • Hi there,
      I am interested in performing "Performance Based Design" for a 20 story building. 
      I'll be performing "Non-Linear Static Pushover Analysis" for my model. Until now, I have decided to go with "Displacement Co-efficient method". I will be using ETABS 2017 for performing Pushover Analysis. While assigning plastic hinges, I have an option of using ASCE 41-17 (Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing buildings". I would like to know what would be a better estimate for relative distances for plastic hinges in case of beams, columns. Any input concerning assignment of hinges to beams, columns and shear walls is highly appreciated. Normally it's taken 0.05 and 0.95 or 0.1 and 0.9. What's your opinion on this?
      Secondly, it would be great if someone can recommend me a book or some good source to understand how to characterize building using performance levels. Any sort of help is appreciated.
      I have recently graduated and joined a structural design firm, so kindly guide me, considering me a beginner.

       
      • 2 replies
    • *SEFP Consistent Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Pile Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Doc No: 10-00-CD-0007*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Date: April 16, 2018*

      1.1. FUNCTION OF JOINT

      Beam-column joint must transfer the forces, such as moment, shear and torsion, transferred by the beam to the column so that the structure can maintain its integrity to carry loads for which it is designed.

      Another function of the beam-column joint is to help the structure to dissipate seismic forces so that it can behave in a ductile manner.

      1.2.WHY DO WE CARE

      During an extreme seismic event, the code-based structure is expected to maintain its load-carrying capacity for gravity loads even after the structure deforms into inelastic range so that it does not pose any life safety hazard. Hence, the joint can go through significant degradation of strength and stiffness, and if it fails in shear, or anchorage, the life-safety objective of code cannot be achieved.

      1.3.CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE


      1.4.THINGS TO CONSIDER FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      Longitudinal bars of beams, or slab, must be able to develop their yield stress, so that the beam/slab can transfer moment to joint. It means that longitudinal bars must have adequate development length for hooked bars. This implies that the size of the column must be such that bars can develop their tensile forces. If bars can transfer moment, they can also transfer shear as far as monolithic construction is concerned.


      The shear strength of the joint must enable the transfer of moment and shear through it.



      The joint should be Constructible: Congestion of reinforcement is the main concern.

      1.5.DESIGN SHEAR FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      The design shear for beam-column joint depends upon the relative strength of beam and column at the joint.

       
      • 4 replies
    • *Comments/Observations regarding modelling in ETABS*

      *Doc No: 10-00-CD-0006*

      *Date: May 06, 2017*

      Some of the observations made during extraction of results from ETABS (v 9.7.4), for design of reinforced concrete members, are being share in this article.,

      1) Minimum Eccentricity

      ETABS always considers the minimum eccentricity for selecting the design moment of columns irrespective of the probable behavior of the column, whether short or long column. See section 10.10.6.5 and its commentary of ACI 318-08 which deals with minimum eccentricity of long columns. You should always check the design moments that ETABS uses for columns if you want to bring down the cost of construction.

      2) Unbraced/ Braced Preference

      ETABS always performs analysis of frame as if it is un-braced. You should investigate if the storey under consideration is braced, or un-braced (10.10.5.2), and decide appropriate design moments of columns.

      3) Time Period

      ETABS has a tendency to select a time period of the building that is considerably less than the value obtained by the approximate method, Method A, of the section 1630.2.2  of UBC 97. To quote the FEMA 451 document: ''Because this formula is based on lower bound regression analysis of measured building response in California, it will generally result in periods that are lower (hence, more conservative for use in predicting base shear) than those computed from a more rigorous mathematical model". So, there is no need to use the value of time period that is lot less than Ta. One should always check the time period used by the software; ETABS can overestimate the seismic force by more than 2 times.

      Visit the forum link to read the complete article.
      Link: http://www.sepakistan.com/topic/2300-commentsobservations-regarding-modelling-in-etabs/
      • 0 replies
    • The minimum amount and spacing of reinforcement to be used in structural floors, roof slabs, and walls for control of temperature and shrinkage cracking is given in ACI 318 or in ACI 350R. The minimum-reinforcement percentage, which is between 0.18 and 0.20%, does not normally control cracks to within generally acceptable design limits. To control cracks to a more acceptable level, the percentage requirement needs to exceed about 0.60% (REFRENCE ACI COMMITE REPORT 224R-01)



       

       



       

       

      So according to above statement , should we follow 0.60%, to be on more safe side??



       
      • 12 replies
    • Dear Sir/Madam,

      This email is an invitation for the participation in the First South Asia Conference on Earthquake Engineering (SACEE-2019) which will be held on 21-22 February 2019 in Karachi, Pakistan. This conference is the inaugural event in this series of conferences which has been constituted under the auspices of South Asia Earthquake Network (SHAKE). The organisers of the conference include NED University, University of Porto, University of Fuzhou, University Roma Tre and Institution of Engineers Pakistan. The conference website can be visited at http://sacee.neduet.edu.pk/.

      Please note that world leading earthquake engineering experts have confirmed their participation in the conference. These include Prof Abdelkrim Aoudia (Italy), Prof Alper Ilki (Turkey), Dr Amod Mani Dixit (Nepal), Prof Bruno Briseghella (Italy), Prof George Mylonakis (UK), Prof Khalid Mosalam (USA), Prof Humberto Varum (Portugal) and many others. The presence of these distinguished experts allows you to exchange your work/issues with them and discuss possibility of any future collaboration. Please note that participation in the conference is strictly based on registration. Early registration in different categories at reduced rates are available till 10 December 2018. Please visit the conference website to see the details and the link for registration.

      If there are any queries, please do not hesitate to contact the Conference Secretary at the following address

      Prof. Muhammad Masood Rafi
      Conference Secretary- SACEE-2019
      Chairman
      Department of Earthquake Engineering
      NED University of Engineering & Technology Karachi, Pakistan.
      Phone: 0092-21-992-261261 Ext:2605
      Email: rafi-m@neduet.edu.pk
    • What is the Minimum reinforcement For Precast Pile  according to different codes (ACI,BS)??  Pile length is 40 times of pile least dimension . 
      • 1 reply
    • Dear members, I am working on a 10 storied rcc factory building with one basement,  where floor loads are in general 125 psf(Live) . but there are 2 warehouse in the building at ground floor & 10th floor where the Live load of stacked materials are 450psf. I have modeled it and analysed in ETABS. After analysis, seeing the floor displacement for seismic load,  i am in big shock to see the pattern. the displacement pattern suddenly increased hugely & then got normal . if the warehouse load created problem, then why it effected only Ground floor level, not the 10th floor! Please tell me how can i solve it. 
      • 1 reply
    • Asalamualaikum all,

      I have columns which are conflicting with the underground water tank as shown in figure.
       

      So I have decided to make underground water tank base slab as a footing for column. So I import etabs model to safe and just take uniform water load on base slab and point load from columns.

      This is the residential house. The BC is 2tsf. But SAFE is showing tension on the base slab and the thickness from punching is 30''. I believe that thickness is too high. What can be the error? Is this approach is correct for design base slab of ugwt to carry load of two edge columns?
      • 11 replies
    • SAFE perform iterative uplift analysis,any one having experience how to check the results of this analysis???what is the purpose and scope of this analysis???
      • 15 replies
    • Shear wall design
      AOA 

      i am facing problems in shear wall design .what are the pier and spandral ?what will be the difference when we assign pier or spandral? without assigning these the shear wall design is incomplete .

      i am taking about etabsv16

      someone have document about shear wall design plz provide it 

      thank you

       
      • 13 replies
  • Tell a friend

    Love Structural Engineering Forum Of Pakistan? Tell a friend!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.