Jump to content
  • Welcome to SEFP!

    Welcome!

    Welcome to our community forums, full of great discussions about Structural Engineering. Please register to become a part of our thriving group or login if you are already registered.

Steel Connection Design using Etabs


Juli
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hello.. Is it possible to analysis and design a steel building fully with Etabs including purlin, rafter assigning? And also for connection design and baseplate, is ETABS connection menu is well enough or ok for modification and using practically? Or you experts are using any other soft for only steel connection design from etabs output? I mean I have tried TEKLA, but it seems to me only good for steel detailing, again in staadpro, there is RAM connection but I don't prefer staad pro for modeling complex and tall structures as the visual and graphics effect and also complex lengthy terms. But my seniors told me that staad pro is used and better for steel structures, for connection design etc, but I do prefer ETABS, I see there is connection design tab and procedures, but as I am new in steel learning, so can I do all things, connection, baseplate design, modify I mean as per AISC code everything change that I need in etabs for steel?  Please suggest.Thanks in advance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Juli,

For steel, I do the software analysis and member sizing of the members using SAP2000 or RISA3D. For baseplate design, I either do manual calculations or use an in-house software.

For connection design, I show the connection loads on the design drawings and provide them to a fabricator. The fabricator's engineer designs the connections, stamps his drawings and submits the shop drawings to me for review before they are issued for construction. This is the standard practice in North America.

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks a lot. So now can you please tell me in short if you don't mind please, that the using of SAP why better or you prefer for steel analysis and member sizing  than ETABS? What privileges I will get better in SAP than ETABS for steel? And also, so for connection design or baseplate, Can I do that from connection loads or forces output from SAP and in RAM connection if you know, as I will have to learn that and I am not in touch with any fabricator ? Thanks again for hanging out with me and providing informative information, I am really grateful :) 

 

And please help with these issues I posted another thread and now deleting and so posting here :

1. Hello.. can you please explain simply that when I will assign pinned support and when fixed in ETABS? Please do not mention huge geotechnical issues here as they just sometime make it much more complex, you please explain it simply with soil condition basing or footing based. 

2. Does etabs automatic count for long columns, i mean if a column is slender column, will etabs will design it considering slender column design process and length factors? or will I have to do it manually and if so, how? 

3. If I assign fixed support, then what would be for baseplate design consideration? biaxial moment should be considered or fixed isn't ok for baseplate? 

4. When exporting slab from etabs to safe, will i need to export lateral load combos also for moment consideration? Same for footing in Safe, I am exporting etabs base reactions for footing design in Safe (isolated or combined), now will i need the al load combos like for horizontal forces or moments also? Or just like only gravity  load combination reactions need to be exported? 

5. It's ok that when I do P delta effect assigned, that means when I am doing 2nd order analysis in Etabs, then I am using section modifier value for frames and slabs ( Like as ACI directs .7 for column, .35 for Beam, .25 fo shell etc. ), But if I don't perform 2nd order analysis, i,e  P delta analysis, then do I need to change the default modifiers ( that are 1 ),  or if I do change, then is it wrong? 

Thanks 

Edited by Juli
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Juli said:

So now can you please tell me in short if you don't mind please, that the using of SAP why better or you prefer for steel analysis and member sizing  than ETABS? What privileges I will get better in SAP than ETABS for steel?

The company I work for has license for SAP2000 and RISA3D only. They don't use ETABS and thats why I don't use ETABS either. I have found RISA3D more friendly for connection output.

6 hours ago, Juli said:

And also, so for connection design or baseplate, Can I do that from connection loads or forces output from SAP and in RAM connection if you know, as I will have to learn that and I am not in touch with any fabricator ?

You should be able to do it. I haven't used RAM connection but you should be able to get output from SAP2000 and use that in RAM Connection. The softwares (SAP2000 and RAM Connection) I believe are not integrated and you would have to manually enter data in RAM Connection. I did some google and noticed that Ram Connection is integrated with Staad Pro. You can check the following website for more details: 

http://communities.bentley.com/products/structural/structural_analysis___design/w/structural_analysis_and_design__wiki/8354.tips-for-using-ram-connection-within-staad-pro-tn

6 hours ago, Juli said:

1. Hello.. can you please explain simply that when I will assign pinned support and when fixed in ETABS? Please do not mention huge geotechnical issues here as they just sometime make it much more complex, you please explain it simply with soil condition basing or footing based. 

Pin or Fixed from a geotechnical perspective: http://www.sepakistan.com/topic/1578-pin-support-or-fixed-support/

Pin or Fixed from Column Base Plate Connection perspective: http://www.sepakistan.com/topic/1500-steel-column-base-plate-modelling-in-sap/

7 hours ago, Juli said:

2. Does etabs automatic count for long columns, i mean if a column is slender column, will etabs will design it considering slender column design process and length factors? or will I have to do it manually and if so, how? 

I am not very familiar with ETABS. I would let someone else answer this.

7 hours ago, Juli said:

3. If I assign fixed support, then what would be for baseplate design consideration? biaxial moment should be considered or fixed isn't ok for baseplate?

A fix support assignment for connection between your column and baseplate would induce moment in your baseplate. You need to design your baseplate for the reaction moment along with other loads.

7 hours ago, Juli said:

4. When exporting slab from etabs to safe, will i need to export lateral load combos also for moment consideration? Same for footing in Safe, I am exporting etabs base reactions for footing design in Safe (isolated or combined), now will i need the al load combos like for horizontal forces or moments also? Or just like only gravity  load combination reactions need to be exported?

You should export all load combinations for strength design of foundation. Please note that some load combinations might not be applicable for bearing pressure check depending upon the code you follow but they are applicable for foundation design (flexural and shear design of foundation).

7 hours ago, Juli said:

5. It's ok that when I do P delta effect assigned, that means when I am doing 2nd order analysis in Etabs, then I am using section modifier value for frames and slabs ( Like as ACI directs .7 for column, .35 for Beam, .25 fo shell etc. ), But if I don't perform 2nd order analysis, i,e  P delta analysis, then do I need to change the default modifiers ( that are 1 ),  or if I do change, then is it wrong?

You should consider stiffness modifiers irrespective or p-detals.

Thanks.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • Hi there,
      I am interested in performing "Performance Based Design" for a 20 story building. 
      I'll be performing "Non-Linear Static Pushover Analysis" for my model. Until now, I have decided to go with "Displacement Co-efficient method". I will be using ETABS 2017 for performing Pushover Analysis. While assigning plastic hinges, I have an option of using ASCE 41-17 (Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing buildings". I would like to know what would be a better estimate for relative distances for plastic hinges in case of beams, columns. Any input concerning assignment of hinges to beams, columns and shear walls is highly appreciated. Normally it's taken 0.05 and 0.95 or 0.1 and 0.9. What's your opinion on this?
      Secondly, it would be great if someone can recommend me a book or some good source to understand how to characterize building using performance levels. Any sort of help is appreciated.
      I have recently graduated and joined a structural design firm, so kindly guide me, considering me a beginner.

       
      • 2 replies
    • *SEFP Consistent Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Pile Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Doc No: 10-00-CD-0007*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Date: April 16, 2018*

      1.1. FUNCTION OF JOINT

      Beam-column joint must transfer the forces, such as moment, shear and torsion, transferred by the beam to the column so that the structure can maintain its integrity to carry loads for which it is designed.

      Another function of the beam-column joint is to help the structure to dissipate seismic forces so that it can behave in a ductile manner.

      1.2.WHY DO WE CARE

      During an extreme seismic event, the code-based structure is expected to maintain its load-carrying capacity for gravity loads even after the structure deforms into inelastic range so that it does not pose any life safety hazard. Hence, the joint can go through significant degradation of strength and stiffness, and if it fails in shear, or anchorage, the life-safety objective of code cannot be achieved.

      1.3.CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE


      1.4.THINGS TO CONSIDER FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      Longitudinal bars of beams, or slab, must be able to develop their yield stress, so that the beam/slab can transfer moment to joint. It means that longitudinal bars must have adequate development length for hooked bars. This implies that the size of the column must be such that bars can develop their tensile forces. If bars can transfer moment, they can also transfer shear as far as monolithic construction is concerned.


      The shear strength of the joint must enable the transfer of moment and shear through it.



      The joint should be Constructible: Congestion of reinforcement is the main concern.

      1.5.DESIGN SHEAR FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      The design shear for beam-column joint depends upon the relative strength of beam and column at the joint.

       
      • 4 replies
    • *Comments/Observations regarding modelling in ETABS*

      *Doc No: 10-00-CD-0006*

      *Date: May 06, 2017*

      Some of the observations made during extraction of results from ETABS (v 9.7.4), for design of reinforced concrete members, are being share in this article.,

      1) Minimum Eccentricity

      ETABS always considers the minimum eccentricity for selecting the design moment of columns irrespective of the probable behavior of the column, whether short or long column. See section 10.10.6.5 and its commentary of ACI 318-08 which deals with minimum eccentricity of long columns. You should always check the design moments that ETABS uses for columns if you want to bring down the cost of construction.

      2) Unbraced/ Braced Preference

      ETABS always performs analysis of frame as if it is un-braced. You should investigate if the storey under consideration is braced, or un-braced (10.10.5.2), and decide appropriate design moments of columns.

      3) Time Period

      ETABS has a tendency to select a time period of the building that is considerably less than the value obtained by the approximate method, Method A, of the section 1630.2.2  of UBC 97. To quote the FEMA 451 document: ''Because this formula is based on lower bound regression analysis of measured building response in California, it will generally result in periods that are lower (hence, more conservative for use in predicting base shear) than those computed from a more rigorous mathematical model". So, there is no need to use the value of time period that is lot less than Ta. One should always check the time period used by the software; ETABS can overestimate the seismic force by more than 2 times.

      Visit the forum link to read the complete article.
      Link: http://www.sepakistan.com/topic/2300-commentsobservations-regarding-modelling-in-etabs/
      • 0 replies
    • The minimum amount and spacing of reinforcement to be used in structural floors, roof slabs, and walls for control of temperature and shrinkage cracking is given in ACI 318 or in ACI 350R. The minimum-reinforcement percentage, which is between 0.18 and 0.20%, does not normally control cracks to within generally acceptable design limits. To control cracks to a more acceptable level, the percentage requirement needs to exceed about 0.60% (REFRENCE ACI COMMITE REPORT 224R-01)



       

       



       

       

      So according to above statement , should we follow 0.60%, to be on more safe side??



       
      • 12 replies
    • Dear Sir/Madam,

      This email is an invitation for the participation in the First South Asia Conference on Earthquake Engineering (SACEE-2019) which will be held on 21-22 February 2019 in Karachi, Pakistan. This conference is the inaugural event in this series of conferences which has been constituted under the auspices of South Asia Earthquake Network (SHAKE). The organisers of the conference include NED University, University of Porto, University of Fuzhou, University Roma Tre and Institution of Engineers Pakistan. The conference website can be visited at http://sacee.neduet.edu.pk/.

      Please note that world leading earthquake engineering experts have confirmed their participation in the conference. These include Prof Abdelkrim Aoudia (Italy), Prof Alper Ilki (Turkey), Dr Amod Mani Dixit (Nepal), Prof Bruno Briseghella (Italy), Prof George Mylonakis (UK), Prof Khalid Mosalam (USA), Prof Humberto Varum (Portugal) and many others. The presence of these distinguished experts allows you to exchange your work/issues with them and discuss possibility of any future collaboration. Please note that participation in the conference is strictly based on registration. Early registration in different categories at reduced rates are available till 10 December 2018. Please visit the conference website to see the details and the link for registration.

      If there are any queries, please do not hesitate to contact the Conference Secretary at the following address

      Prof. Muhammad Masood Rafi
      Conference Secretary- SACEE-2019
      Chairman
      Department of Earthquake Engineering
      NED University of Engineering & Technology Karachi, Pakistan.
      Phone: 0092-21-992-261261 Ext:2605
      Email: rafi-m@neduet.edu.pk
    • What is the Minimum reinforcement For Precast Pile  according to different codes (ACI,BS)??  Pile length is 40 times of pile least dimension . 
      • 1 reply
    • Dear members, I am working on a 10 storied rcc factory building with one basement,  where floor loads are in general 125 psf(Live) . but there are 2 warehouse in the building at ground floor & 10th floor where the Live load of stacked materials are 450psf. I have modeled it and analysed in ETABS. After analysis, seeing the floor displacement for seismic load,  i am in big shock to see the pattern. the displacement pattern suddenly increased hugely & then got normal . if the warehouse load created problem, then why it effected only Ground floor level, not the 10th floor! Please tell me how can i solve it. 
      • 1 reply
    • Asalamualaikum all,

      I have columns which are conflicting with the underground water tank as shown in figure.
       

      So I have decided to make underground water tank base slab as a footing for column. So I import etabs model to safe and just take uniform water load on base slab and point load from columns.

      This is the residential house. The BC is 2tsf. But SAFE is showing tension on the base slab and the thickness from punching is 30''. I believe that thickness is too high. What can be the error? Is this approach is correct for design base slab of ugwt to carry load of two edge columns?
      • 11 replies
    • SAFE perform iterative uplift analysis,any one having experience how to check the results of this analysis???what is the purpose and scope of this analysis???
      • 15 replies
    • Shear wall design
      AOA 

      i am facing problems in shear wall design .what are the pier and spandral ?what will be the difference when we assign pier or spandral? without assigning these the shear wall design is incomplete .

      i am taking about etabsv16

      someone have document about shear wall design plz provide it 

      thank you

       
      • 13 replies
  • Tell a friend

    Love Structural Engineering Forum Of Pakistan? Tell a friend!
  • Similar Content

  • Recent Discussions

  • Latest Forum and Club Posts

    • ETABS has various options i.e., Diaphragm Max over Avg Drifts, Story Max over Avg Displacements, Story Max over Avg drifts (Go to display tables> analysis results> joint output> displacement> the options area available here) I noticed some people do this torsional sensitivity check and calculation of torsional amplification factor (Ax and Ay) based on story drift and not on story displacements... the results from each approach gets different ??? also there is another option with Diaphragm  so what's the correct approach ??? and how do we know actually what points ETABS has considered for calculation of max/min displacement or drifts.  
    • I am working on a high rise building (overall 69 stories, 10 stories of carpark, transfer slab at level 12) located in a very low seismic zone (PGA 5%g). The building first mode is translational (i considered Ux, Uy and Uz tables for this classification) and 2nd mode is torsional followed by 3rd mode again in translational.  The modal mass participation ration as shown below. I considered the default 12 modes and getting the required overall 90 percent mass participation both in X and Y direction (Sum Ux and also Sum Uy) but didnt consider the SumUz or ther SUm Rx,Ry and Rz. Is this important ??? I understand that ideally the first 2 modes should be translational followed by torsional mode and this can be achieved with proper structural distribution of elements on the floor plans however for this building the design was freeze and the design team want to proceed. After the response spectrum analysis, i showed them that the higher reinforcement in column and shear walls are resulting from this torsional behavior in 2nd mode. My question is that we have incorporated additional reinforcement tin these shear walls and columns however the slab diaphragm needs any attention ??? or any other element like designing diaphragm particularly at the transfer level to ensure that it receives this torsion and transfer safely to shear walls and columns ??    
    • I am working on a multi tower building with a common podium (Fig 1). The initial ETABS model  wasn't built using multiple tower option however during the seismic design incorporation, i activated this "Multiple tower" option in ETABS and accordingly set podium to T1 and T2 and T3 for the remaining two towers (Fig 2). Afterwards i partially exported the towers and performed the analysis to get story forces from individual tower models. These forces were finally added as user defined seismic load in the full complete model (Fig3) As mentioned above that not to use ELF base shear, i initially thought it shouldn't be an issue. However later after analyzing the complete full model with multiple towers i realized, that it  almost showed double base shear from ELF in case we go for automatic seismic load (based on code) compared to manually applying the story forces on the towers (Fig 4). I am not sure if its some modelling mistake and trying to figure out why there is much different in static load case however the response spectrum from both models show minor difference         
    • Yes, as the approximate period is simplified and often conservative compared to more accurate one obtained from modal analysis which reflects actual stiffness, mass distribution, and geometry of structure
    • @Wajahat Latif Can you further elaborate on the above point 
    • Can share and elaborate the different load combos required for the towers which are resting on a common podium and how these are different in case a seismic joint is there ?? Also what design consideration have to be taken for the diaphragm at top of podium where the towers are resting ??As i believe that out of phase movement for the 2 towers will generate high internal forces at the podium diaphragm. Does ETABS automatically considers them or we need to manually define some combinations for such scenarios ???
    • what is our ultimate goal by making reduction in members stiffnesses in softwares ?? i know the concept but i do not know the sense behind this in terms of the practical advantages will get after doing this and what will happen if we did not .
    • hi engineers , May i know why we have to rely on meshing to govern our programe results and hence the design , if result is going to be affected by meshing how colud we get the accurate result for safe design ??? and to what limit can we depend on meshing ?
    • Just use excel. Make a simple worksheet listing bar dia, number, length for each element. Bar weight tables are available online.  OR If its a building and you have the Etabs model. Run the detailer, it will give weight of steel required for each floor or member wise. Staad Pro also gives total steel weight and concrete volume for the model
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.