Jump to content
  • Welcome to SEFP!

    Welcome!

    Welcome to our community forums, full of great discussions about Structural Engineering. Please register to become a part of our thriving group or login if you are already registered.

Pile Design For Machine Foundation


Recommended Posts

After the application of Time History Function as per CSI-tutorial "Vibrating machinery steel skid on piles", the undesirable range of frequencies (20% above and below of machine operating speed):

 

Turbine         -  mode 11   to   mode 16,

Alternator      -  mode  35  to   mode 47.

 

The result of frequencies are almost the same as before. Please comment.

Book1.xls

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your spreadsheet is showing acceleration. You need to look at either velocity or displacement. Have a look at the tutorial I posted the link to. It explains how you can check specific nodes for vibration limit. Once you do that, then you could run resonance runs and find your final amplitudes.

 

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, lets go step by step.

 

What are the points where you are checking the max vibrations? CGs?

 

Provide a table where you report maximum vibrations due to load case at cg locations only and also what machine caused these vibrations? Also, what are your maximum limits in microns? 

 

 

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Loads are applied at TOP DECK-points (TTF-zip-file attached in my earlier posts) provided by vendor with static loads (vertical direction only) & dynamic loads (Unbalanced forces in x,y & z directions) for respective machines. Top deck has common bottom level with different thicknesses. Left side of the deck is for TURBINE (different color in SAP2000 picture) & right side is for Alternator (TTF-zip-file attached in my earlier posts).

 

Maximum permissible amplitude of vibration on top of deck is 30 microns (Provided by Vendor). 

 

Lines from tutorial - "In many cases, the vendor will give separate CoM locations for major components (pump, gearbox, turbine, turbine rotor, generator, etc.), in which case you would add joints for each component of the equipment where you will assign force/weight which will be converted to mass." 

 

I'm assuming that LOAD POINTS provided by vendor are aforementioned CoM-locations. In that case, I have applied static & dynamic loads at these locations and have run TIME-HISTORY FUNCTION, which yielded into results posted earlier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Suarez,

I have gone through all your attachments. Here are a few things that you should consider:

Time History Function & Load Case:

You have applied the loads but you have to associate your loads with some function that would make it a dynamic load. The loads that vendor provided are normally called machine unbalanced forces and they are function of machine speed. What you do is set-up a time history load case and specify load patterns which contain your dynamic load along with sine and cosine functions and link them to your TH load case. Read through tutorial to understand how to define a TH Load Case for machine operating. See attached Image from CSI Example .post-1-0-04615900-1400966927_thumb.gif

COM Location:

I'm assuming that LOAD POINTS provided by vendor are aforementioned CoM-locations. In that case, I have applied static & dynamic loads at these locations and have run TIME-HISTORY FUNCTION, which yielded into results posted earlier

You should not assume and ask vendor to provide you the COM locations. COM locations are always higher than the supporting structure. Image that you provided above (TTF-zip-file ) there are no joints defined above the top platform, so I cann't say that you are applying your loads at the correct locations. See attached Image from CSI Example. post-1-0-04075600-1400967278_thumb.jpg

Results:

The results posted by you do not mean anything. You have posted 5634 lines of output. Before you proceed, ask your vendor, what is the location where the amplitude needs to be satisfied. Is it the COM locations? Is it the Top of Concrete Table Top? and then check your maximum vibration at that level. Tutorial shows you how to check amplitudes too.See attached image.post-1-0-93990100-1400968158_thumb.jpg

What is stopping you to complete your calc correctly?

The machines your are designing the concrete table top foundation operate at 2 different speeds. You need output for both machines independent at the points of interest and then you need to superimpose that output. Let it be displacement or velocity. Another reason why you need to do that is your pile impedance for both operating speeds is different.First you establish that at the machine speed your vibrations are less than 30 microns, then you proceed to check your resonance runs (for all modes between 0.8 to 1.2 * Operating Speed).

Going Forward:

You have to realize that you have a complete example with you, and if you go through all my replies, I have provided you with all general and some specific information that you would need to complete the analysis. You have to take your time and understand things that you are trying to design. I can't review or vet models because of my work load, but I can tell you what to do. I can't check anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Umar,

 

You have no idea how important & informative your replies has been. I have learned so much from these posts and they have been so forthcoming. I really appreciate and admire, and I really recognize and acknowledge your efforts.

 

Following replies are in good faith and utmost respect:

 

1. Time History Function & Load Case:
You have applied the loads but you have to associate...............
I had already done that [New Picture (4) & (5)].....
 
2. COM Location:
You should not assume and ask vendor to provide you...........
I shall ask vendor for CoM locations.
 
"Load Points" are load locations on top of deck for static loads & dynamic loads (unbalanced forces) which were provided by vendor with machine drawings along with machine dimensions etc. These locations are Foundation-Bolts-Locations which connects machine to foundation through base plate.
 
3. Results:
Before you proceed, ask your vendor, what is the location where the amplitude needs to be satisfied. Is it the COM locations? Is it the Top of Concrete Table Top?
In my last post, I mentioned what vendor had ask for, "Maximum permissible amplitude of vibration on top of deck is 30 microns." 

Attached is "Display Plot Function Traces" ..... [New Picture (6)].

 

Thx a bunch.

New Picture (4).bmp

New Picture (5).bmp

New Picture (6).bmp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am glad that you have set up everything and results are with you. I am not sure if your Time History load case is correct since I don't use periodic Time History function. Also, your modal damping looks high. Anyways, you have completed your analysis. Good.

Now do your resonance runs and you are done. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • Hi there,
      I am interested in performing "Performance Based Design" for a 20 story building. 
      I'll be performing "Non-Linear Static Pushover Analysis" for my model. Until now, I have decided to go with "Displacement Co-efficient method". I will be using ETABS 2017 for performing Pushover Analysis. While assigning plastic hinges, I have an option of using ASCE 41-17 (Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing buildings". I would like to know what would be a better estimate for relative distances for plastic hinges in case of beams, columns. Any input concerning assignment of hinges to beams, columns and shear walls is highly appreciated. Normally it's taken 0.05 and 0.95 or 0.1 and 0.9. What's your opinion on this?
      Secondly, it would be great if someone can recommend me a book or some good source to understand how to characterize building using performance levels. Any sort of help is appreciated.
      I have recently graduated and joined a structural design firm, so kindly guide me, considering me a beginner.

       
      • 2 replies
    • *SEFP Consistent Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Pile Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Doc No: 10-00-CD-0007*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Date: April 16, 2018*

      1.1. FUNCTION OF JOINT

      Beam-column joint must transfer the forces, such as moment, shear and torsion, transferred by the beam to the column so that the structure can maintain its integrity to carry loads for which it is designed.

      Another function of the beam-column joint is to help the structure to dissipate seismic forces so that it can behave in a ductile manner.

      1.2.WHY DO WE CARE

      During an extreme seismic event, the code-based structure is expected to maintain its load-carrying capacity for gravity loads even after the structure deforms into inelastic range so that it does not pose any life safety hazard. Hence, the joint can go through significant degradation of strength and stiffness, and if it fails in shear, or anchorage, the life-safety objective of code cannot be achieved.

      1.3.CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE


      1.4.THINGS TO CONSIDER FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      Longitudinal bars of beams, or slab, must be able to develop their yield stress, so that the beam/slab can transfer moment to joint. It means that longitudinal bars must have adequate development length for hooked bars. This implies that the size of the column must be such that bars can develop their tensile forces. If bars can transfer moment, they can also transfer shear as far as monolithic construction is concerned.


      The shear strength of the joint must enable the transfer of moment and shear through it.



      The joint should be Constructible: Congestion of reinforcement is the main concern.

      1.5.DESIGN SHEAR FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      The design shear for beam-column joint depends upon the relative strength of beam and column at the joint.

       
      • 4 replies
    • *Comments/Observations regarding modelling in ETABS*

      *Doc No: 10-00-CD-0006*

      *Date: May 06, 2017*

      Some of the observations made during extraction of results from ETABS (v 9.7.4), for design of reinforced concrete members, are being share in this article.,

      1) Minimum Eccentricity

      ETABS always considers the minimum eccentricity for selecting the design moment of columns irrespective of the probable behavior of the column, whether short or long column. See section 10.10.6.5 and its commentary of ACI 318-08 which deals with minimum eccentricity of long columns. You should always check the design moments that ETABS uses for columns if you want to bring down the cost of construction.

      2) Unbraced/ Braced Preference

      ETABS always performs analysis of frame as if it is un-braced. You should investigate if the storey under consideration is braced, or un-braced (10.10.5.2), and decide appropriate design moments of columns.

      3) Time Period

      ETABS has a tendency to select a time period of the building that is considerably less than the value obtained by the approximate method, Method A, of the section 1630.2.2  of UBC 97. To quote the FEMA 451 document: ''Because this formula is based on lower bound regression analysis of measured building response in California, it will generally result in periods that are lower (hence, more conservative for use in predicting base shear) than those computed from a more rigorous mathematical model". So, there is no need to use the value of time period that is lot less than Ta. One should always check the time period used by the software; ETABS can overestimate the seismic force by more than 2 times.

      Visit the forum link to read the complete article.
      Link: http://www.sepakistan.com/topic/2300-commentsobservations-regarding-modelling-in-etabs/
      • 0 replies
    • The minimum amount and spacing of reinforcement to be used in structural floors, roof slabs, and walls for control of temperature and shrinkage cracking is given in ACI 318 or in ACI 350R. The minimum-reinforcement percentage, which is between 0.18 and 0.20%, does not normally control cracks to within generally acceptable design limits. To control cracks to a more acceptable level, the percentage requirement needs to exceed about 0.60% (REFRENCE ACI COMMITE REPORT 224R-01)



       

       



       

       

      So according to above statement , should we follow 0.60%, to be on more safe side??



       
      • 12 replies
    • Dear Sir/Madam,

      This email is an invitation for the participation in the First South Asia Conference on Earthquake Engineering (SACEE-2019) which will be held on 21-22 February 2019 in Karachi, Pakistan. This conference is the inaugural event in this series of conferences which has been constituted under the auspices of South Asia Earthquake Network (SHAKE). The organisers of the conference include NED University, University of Porto, University of Fuzhou, University Roma Tre and Institution of Engineers Pakistan. The conference website can be visited at http://sacee.neduet.edu.pk/.

      Please note that world leading earthquake engineering experts have confirmed their participation in the conference. These include Prof Abdelkrim Aoudia (Italy), Prof Alper Ilki (Turkey), Dr Amod Mani Dixit (Nepal), Prof Bruno Briseghella (Italy), Prof George Mylonakis (UK), Prof Khalid Mosalam (USA), Prof Humberto Varum (Portugal) and many others. The presence of these distinguished experts allows you to exchange your work/issues with them and discuss possibility of any future collaboration. Please note that participation in the conference is strictly based on registration. Early registration in different categories at reduced rates are available till 10 December 2018. Please visit the conference website to see the details and the link for registration.

      If there are any queries, please do not hesitate to contact the Conference Secretary at the following address

      Prof. Muhammad Masood Rafi
      Conference Secretary- SACEE-2019
      Chairman
      Department of Earthquake Engineering
      NED University of Engineering & Technology Karachi, Pakistan.
      Phone: 0092-21-992-261261 Ext:2605
      Email: rafi-m@neduet.edu.pk
    • What is the Minimum reinforcement For Precast Pile  according to different codes (ACI,BS)??  Pile length is 40 times of pile least dimension . 
      • 1 reply
    • Dear members, I am working on a 10 storied rcc factory building with one basement,  where floor loads are in general 125 psf(Live) . but there are 2 warehouse in the building at ground floor & 10th floor where the Live load of stacked materials are 450psf. I have modeled it and analysed in ETABS. After analysis, seeing the floor displacement for seismic load,  i am in big shock to see the pattern. the displacement pattern suddenly increased hugely & then got normal . if the warehouse load created problem, then why it effected only Ground floor level, not the 10th floor! Please tell me how can i solve it. 
      • 1 reply
    • Asalamualaikum all,

      I have columns which are conflicting with the underground water tank as shown in figure.
       

      So I have decided to make underground water tank base slab as a footing for column. So I import etabs model to safe and just take uniform water load on base slab and point load from columns.

      This is the residential house. The BC is 2tsf. But SAFE is showing tension on the base slab and the thickness from punching is 30''. I believe that thickness is too high. What can be the error? Is this approach is correct for design base slab of ugwt to carry load of two edge columns?
      • 11 replies
    • SAFE perform iterative uplift analysis,any one having experience how to check the results of this analysis???what is the purpose and scope of this analysis???
      • 15 replies
    • Shear wall design
      AOA 

      i am facing problems in shear wall design .what are the pier and spandral ?what will be the difference when we assign pier or spandral? without assigning these the shear wall design is incomplete .

      i am taking about etabsv16

      someone have document about shear wall design plz provide it 

      thank you

       
      • 13 replies
  • Tell a friend

    Love Structural Engineering Forum Of Pakistan? Tell a friend!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.