Jump to content
  • Welcome to SEFP!

    Welcome!

    Welcome to our community forums, full of great discussions about Structural Engineering. Please register to become a part of our thriving group or login if you are already registered.

Recommended Posts

Salam

Dear Sefpians!!

I have to design a foundation for a 15m high floodlight pole, dia of the pole is 10 inches, pole is welded with the baseplate (provided by manufacturer), how the forces will be transferred to anchors. what forces will be on anchors. how forces will be transferred from anchors to foundation. anchors will be embedded in-situ concrete.

Regards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Waqar,

Do you have the baseplate size from vendor. If yes, what is the bolt pattern (Bolt holes and distance). Also, did the vendor give you design loads for anchor bolts? If yes, great. If you don't have anchor bolt loads, you need to manually calculate wind on the floodlights and pole and the reaction at the base and design anchor bolts and foundation accordingly.

If you have the bolt pattern, I can show you how to resolve the forces to anchor bolts and other things that you should keep in mind. For foundation, a square foundation with a concrete pedestal would do the job.

Thanks.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Sir umar

pole has 10 inches dia and base plate is 15in x 15in, with four anchors option on four sides. no loads for anchors are provided by manufacturer, an approx weight of pole is given 350Kgs mounted with 2x lights panels weight 80Kgs . wind speed 100mph for islamabad area. i am not clear if wind will be applied on one side of the pole (half area) or suction may also be applied.

Regards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So it's no very heavy. Applying 100mph, what is the factored shear and moment that you get at the base of the pole (Use the exposed area of lights and pole to calculate that). I would also like to know the center to center distance of proposed bolts as well.

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i applied a wind pressure of 30psf on one side of the pole and got 1.6M=40k-ft and shear 1.6V=1.76, m not sure about the factor 1.6. anchors are 12" apart at center. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You should use the load combination with wind loads. I don't know what the latest is for ACI so make sure your factors reflect wind not live load.

Assuming we go with 4 bolts as proposed at 12" c/c, You need to design your anchor bolts for tension : T = 40 kip ft / ( 1 ft * 2 bolts) = 20 kips per bolt on tension side. I have used 2 bolts as the other two bolts would be in compression.

Shear per bolt would be (assuming 2 bolts take shear) = 1.76/ 2 = Almost 1 kips per bolt.

Now with these forces, you need to size your bolt based on ACI Appendix D. Start with a 1" bolt. Have you used Appendix D before? If yes, great. If no, give it a try for a day and if you can't figure out let me know.

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, UmarMakhzumi said:

Shear per bolt would be (assuming 2 bolts take shear) = 1.76/ 2 = Almost 1 kips per bolt.

Why r u asumimg only two bolts effective in shear? R u assuming bolts in tension would not be effective in shear or what? 

Also why earth quack load is not being used to calculated base forces?

@waqar saleem as umer said your bolts will not only be designed for tension only but also for some failure moods associated with bolts i.e. breakout failure, pryout failure etc. so appendix D of ACI deals with it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Engr Waqas said:

Why r u asumimg only two bolts effective in shear? R u assuming bolts in tension would not be effective in shear or what?

Most of the time, base plate holes are oversized for easier installation. That makes it hard to determine how many bolts would be effective in shear so that is why 50% of the bolts are ignored. The one in tension are considered to take shear. For the case here, shear is very small and can also be ignored.

3 hours ago, Engr Waqas said:

Also why earth quack load is not being used to calculated base forces?

Earthquake load can be checked and the max of earthquake or wind should be considered for all design situations. However, looking at the weight here, you can tell that earthquake would not govern.

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In calculating design forces, have you considered the application of point load on a panel, which will support lights, at the top of the pole, in addition to the UDL on the pole itself.

Is it possible that only two bolts will be effective in resisting moment for a wind direction in which two bolts will lie on the neutral axis, and the moment arm will be sqrt(2) x 12.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, BAZ said:

In calculating design forces, have you considered the application of point load on a panel, which will support lights, at the top of the pole, in addition to the UDL on the pole itself.

Is it possible that only two bolts will be effective in resisting moment for a wind direction in which two bolts will lie on the neutral axis, and the moment arm will be sqrt(2) x 12.

This is a very good point and would result in higher tension. This is a very likely limit state.

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Eq will likely not govern, as a rough value 1kpax1.6 is the wind load. You get mu=wl2/2 and vu=1.6kn. T=C on each side will be mu/arm between bolts. For each bolt tension will be T/2 and shear will be Vu/2 (only 2 bolts resist shear). Remember there will be tension shear interaction for bolt design plus use Appendix D of ACI. This is a simple example. For complex base plate patterns use RisaBase software for biaxial design or make a model with assumption that base plate is stiff (use very thick shell) and frame elements as bolts. Or use the formula to calculate tension compression on bolts from applied moment and P which depends on distance of bolt from centroid divided by group x2 or y2. See any foundation book.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Our picks

    • AOA 

      i am facing problems in shear wall design .what are the pier and spandral ?what will be the difference when we assign pier or spandral? without assigning these the shear wall design is incomplete .

      i am taking about etabsv16

      someone have document about shear wall design plz provide it 

      thank you

       
      • 9 replies
    • Salam Members,

      Congratulations to Engineers, PEC has become full signatory of Washington Accord, what are the benefits to Pakistani engineers for this agreement. 

       

      Regards   

       

       
      • 3 replies
    • Please clarify the following confusions one by one:-

       

      1. If we run P-delta analysis in ETABS, then should we ignore stiffness property modifiers for beams and columns? I have heard that if we perform P-delta analysis and apply stiffness modifiers at the same time then the moment magnification process is doubled...?

       

      2. ETABS considers selenderness of a column by applying moment magnification factors. If we run P-delta analysis also, does it mean that the selenderness of column is being over-estimated? I mean once the moments are magnified in P-delta analysis process and again through moment magnification process?

       

      Please help me understand the software myth and clarify above confusions.
      • 1 reply
    • Assalam o alaikum.
      According to ACI 12.5.2,
      development length for fc' = 3000, fy=60000, for normal weight concrete and epoxy less reinforcement, The required development length comes out to be
      for #3 = 8.2 inch
      for #4 = 10.95 inch
      for #6 = 16.42 inch
      for #8 = 21.9 inch
       
      And if in my case, ACI 12.5.3 is not fulfilled, it means now i have to provide ldh as mentioned above. ldh is STRAIGHT EMBEDMENT LENGTH + RADIUS OF BEND + ONE BAR DIAMETER as shown in figure attached. Now my question is, if in my case, main reinforcement of beam is of #6 and #4, minimum column size required will be 18 inch and 12 inch respectively. Lets say by any means, i can not select #4, #3 bars and size of column where bars are to be terminated is 12 inch, how to fullfil this development length???
      • 11 replies
    • Dear all,

      I am trying to design shearwalls through ETABS with temperature load applied over shell. At various location, spandral section fails in Shear due to temperature and piers (sometime in shear, mostly in flexure).  (See Attached Image)

      Certainly all the problem in Shearwalls are due to temperature. I don't want to increase cross section of spandral or pier at some location just due to temperature load case as it will appears non-uniform with rest of the wall. 

      I have seen stiffness modifier affect distribution of forces and also rigid/semi rigid daiphragm assumption. 

       

      Can anybody guide how to properly design the shear wall with temperature load applied in ETABS or share any similar experience. Thanks in Advance.    
      • 15 replies
    • ENGINEERS;
      I WILL LOOSE MY BRAIN FROM ETABS. 
      I DECIDED TO MAKE MANUAL MESHING FROM AREA ELEMENTS BESIDE EACH OTHER AND EVERY HING WAS FINE .
      BUT AFTER DEVISION SAY 7*7 ELEMNTS FOR EVERY BIG ELEMENT AND MAKING ETABS CHECH..................THEN 500 ERROR MESSAGE THAT ALL ELEMNTS ARE CLOSE TO EACH OTHER.  WHAT ARE GOING...... SOMEONE TELL ME PLEASE...... I WILL LOST MY WORK
      • 6 replies
    • Assalam o alaikum.
      I have just designed a frame structure with SMRF. The out put of shear seams weird to me. Column reports design shear Av/s as 0.045. (Images are attached). but when i right click the member, it must show me the most critical case HIGHLIGHTED AUTOMATICALLY. But it highlights load combo 38 (auto-generated combos have been used) which reports Av/s as 0.038. And 0.045 value is at combo 32. Is their any logic behind it?? More over how to interpret this Av/s?? means 0.045 in kip-in units means what? How can i convert this into spacing?? 
      • 9 replies
    • Hello everyone, I hope all of you will be fine. In etabs when we apply Response Spectrum loading on a multistoried building with 2 basement floors. At what floor level this loading will be applied as in equivalent static seismic analysis, we can apply EQX & EQY on any floor we like as this option is available in etabs but the problem is with response spectrum and time history analysis. please if someone knows and have the experince, share it i shall be very thankful.  
      • 5 replies
    • Salaikom dear professionals,
      First of all I would like to express my sincere thanks to the initiators of this forum for establishing such an exceptional atmosphere for knowledge/experience sharing, I it is really useful, In fact since I have found the forum I am mostly online and busy reading the posts. I would also like to thank the members for their professional comments and advice.
      As my first post in this forum I would like to ask the following queries:
      1-After running the analysis and design when I check the DESIGN DATA through Display >> Show Tables >> DESIGN DATA >> Concrete Frame Output, there is no specific message in Column Summary Data and Beam Summary Data, but in Joint summary data it is showing that “Joint B/C check not done”. Does anyone has any idea? I am sharing the ETABS model for your information and easy reference.
      ETABS MODEL.zip
      2- ETABS provides greater area of steel in the upper column than the column at BASE, perhaps due to higher moment. Could someone explain why this is so? In practice should we maintain maximum steel in both stories? Or we shall follow what the software suggests?
      3- Beside considering the minimum thickness required for deflection control of Beam as per Table 9.a Chapter 9 ACI-318 , using concrete crack behavior in ETABS and checking story drift, Do we have to check the deflection of beams for the serviceability propose elsewhere in ETBAS? If yes, Could anyone explain it?
      Regards, and look forward to any explanation
      • 13 replies
    • Posting this thread to break the ice. Modelling domes is very easy in Etabs/SAP. All you need to do is to draw the curvature of the dome in elevation by a series of straight lines, but draw only the one half. Then using the apex at centre point, radially extrude the line say 24 times at 15 degree intervals (or 48 times at 7.5 deg intervals. This feature is under Edit> Extrude Lines to areas. You can further use this geometry for Finite Element Analaysis.
      • 22 replies
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By muneeb1213
      For calculating the bearing capacity of soil (using N values), the equations for mat foundation and single footings is the same or its separate for each??
    • By muneeb1213
      I m designing a 4 storey building on a poorly graded sand with SPN value of 5 and allowable bearing capacity of 0.5 tonn/sq.ft..... for the mat foundation, i provided beams of 18 x 36 and mat thickness as 24 inches ... however the soil pressure are still above safe bearing capacity.. My question is should i assign line spring property to the footing beams or not???
      The area of footing is also increased but the stresses are still high...
    • By Waqas Haider
      From engineering point of view, it is really very amazing to see a complete city builtup in water ways, in a lagoon. How did they make the foundation system of buildings completely all the time underwater? Really interesting article here is. It also explains some modern challanges to the city i.e. flooding due to raised levels of sea and an inteseting solution to this problem.
      https://sites.google.com/site/engineeringvenice/
       

    • By Waqas Haider
      Assalam o alaikum, 
      i m confused whether collectors and chords are only required in Flat plates/slabs or also required in beam slabs? because in beam slab we are having beams at perimeter of every panel and they can act as chords and for diaphragm bending and as collectors at junction of slab to shear wall. Usually, in seismic zone 4, i dont design diaphragm exclusively. i just design it as simple slab and design my beams in SMRF or Dual Frame in etabs. 
      Also i m confused in excerpt from a document stating
      The Special Seismic Load combination is also indirectly identified in Chapter 18, Section 1809, Foundation Construction – Seismic Zones 3 and 4.
      1809.3 Superstructure-to-Foundation Connection. The connection of superstructure elements to
      the foundation shall be adequate to transmit to the foundation the forces for which the elements
      were required to be designed.
      For instance, since Section 2213.5 Column Requirements specifically identifies the Ω0 factor, Section
      1809.3 requires the column-to-foundation connection to be designed for a load combination which includes
      the Ω0 factor.
      What does it mean? In seismic zone 3 or 4, we need to design foundations for special seismic combos ALWAYS or only if we r having discontinuous system? The full document is also attached. Thanks.
       
       
      OmegaFactorDiscussion.pdf
    • By waqar saleem
      Salam
      Dr.Amjad Saqib!!! I love this person for his efforts to reduce the poverty with dignity. Founder of Akhuwat Foundation speaks from his heart,wondefully . Listen to his speech at TEDx
       
    • By israr_sari
      How to  import multilevel raft foundation from etabs to safe.
      main designer has designed it as a raft foundation with a bearing capacity of 150 kn/m2 but after the site development and excavation we found a hard strata that can with stand with 250 kn/m2(as per the soil report). as total depth of raft is 1 m that is too much for 5 storey car parking, i want to modify it with 250 raft overall with inverted panels under column. but i am not able to import that multi level foundation reactions as a one file in Safe. because in etabs u can only export one storey . 
      please give your helpful suggestions.

    • By groszni awesome
      assalamualaikum sepakistan users
      i wanna ask what are the considerations of using this ribraft foundation thing?
      what are the advantages and disadvantages?
      what are some load applied on it?
      how do we design the slab and the beam?
      thank you.

    • By Kasim
      1. We provide beams at plinth level all around the building under the walls. These beams rest directly on ground above lean concrete. Should we also model them in ETabs model???? is this practise correct?
       should we Design it Like normal beams, (More conservative) ?. Or for Reduced moment? (As they are supported along the length) 
      2. During seismic analysis we specify our Range from Base or Basment of The building to the top or from Ground to the top.?
      3. should we include Plinth beams in our latteral force resisting system? 
      thanks. 
       
    • By Fahad Samo
      I am looking for software or a spread sheet to design an eccentric isolated footing. Can anybody help me with that??
    • By waqar saleem
      who designs foundations??? structural engineer or geotechnical engineer?
  • Recent Discussions

  • Latest Forum and Club Posts

    • Beams are flexural members only  designed for the major moment and shear without axial load effects. However, column design is more accurate as you can account for biaxial bending plus axial load effect on shear. Infact all the beams can be designed by this approach. However, generally beams do not have huge axial loads or minor bending. Thats why it is simplified.
    • I developed this sheet long time ago. See the attached. Strap footings design.xlsx
    • Here are my two cents:- 1. General guidance regarding placement of construction joints in RC work has been provided in Section 6.4 of ACI 318-08 and its commentary. Some clarity is given in section 6.4.3, where it is stated that "Construction joints shall be so made and located as not to impair the strength of the structure. Provision shall be made for transfer of shear and other forces through construction joints." For transfer of shear etc through construction joints, reference is made to the ACI Section 11.6.9 that deals with the calculation of shear-friction, at the interface between two concretes cast at different times (beside other situations described in section 11.6.1 of the code). Moreover, Section 6.4.4 suggests that "Construction joints in floors shall be located within the middle third of spans of slabs, beams, and girders. 2. Regarding construction joints in columns, however, Section 6.4 does not provide guidance clearer  than that in Section 6.4.6 stating that the "Beams, girders, or slabs supported by columns or walls shall not be cast or erected until concrete in the vertical support members is no longer plastic."  And, the commentary section R6.4.6 explains that "Delay in placing concrete in members supported by columns and walls is necessary to prevent cracking at the interface of the slab and supporting member caused by bleeding and settlement of plastic concrete in the supporting member. 3. The support member (referred in previous paragraph) will generally be a column or a wall. And, in a simplified form, Section 6.4.4 & its commentary are advising us NOT to cast beams & slab monolithically with the wall or column, BUT only after the supporting column (or wall) concrete has hardened,  in order to avoid plastic cracking at the beam-column (or beam-wall) joint. 4. In our normal field practice (within Pakistan as well as abroad), beams & slabs are cast at least one day after casting of columns or supporting walls. This gap of one day (between casting of column & beam concretes) ensures that hardening of column (or wall) concrete poured one day earlier has hardened (is no longer plastic),  thereby avoiding any possibility of plastic cracking (discussed in paragraph 2 above). . 5. Now coming to your queries; In general terms, it is preferable to cast the column in one pour.. However, in compelling circumstances it may be done in more than one pour too, subject to certain conditions.   Already described in initial paragraphs.   This is the normal & IMHO desirable practice, according to ACI code Section 6.4.6.   IMO, leaving 9" or 12" column depth below the beam soffit is excessive & undesirable. It should not be more than 1" or 2" in any case.   IMO, this practice is based on the requirements of ACI 318-08 (also ACI 318-11) Section 6.4.6. The same requirement is available in ACI 318-14 Section 26.5.7.2 (a) as well. HTH Regards.
    • Thank you Waqar. I need code reference for this practice.   Thanks
    • Salam Dear Junaid! Cold joints are common and practice is upto soffit, properly roughen the face and apply some chemical at the joint. Leaving column at mid height is not good. Regards
    • References given in the following link might be useful in this connection: http://www.sepakistan.com/topic/1978-strap-footing-design/ Regards.  
    • Any sheet/pdf for design of concentric and edge footing tied with strap beam?
    • AoA all, Is it mandatory to do column concreting upto the soffit of the beam in a single pour ? What code says about the construction/cold joint location in column ? Majority of the contractors are pouring the column concrete upto the soffit of the beam (full height of the column), some contractors leave the column height about 9" to 12" below the beam level and then fill this 9" to 12" column height with the beams & slab concreting. On one site column concreting was stopped at the mid height and the remaining half was filled on the next day. Thanks    
    • SIR KINDLY STUDY building code(ACI318-14) AS WELL AND THEN DISCUSS
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.