Jump to content
  • Welcome to SEFP!

    Welcome!

    Welcome to our community forums, full of great discussions about Structural Engineering. Please register to become a part of our thriving group or login if you are already registered.

SAP2000 modell : Slabless + Cantilevered from RC wall reduced thickness stair


Luk
 Share

Recommended Posts

I have in my official projekt a slabless stair : 3 flyings and 2 landings , 120cm width , Riser = 17cm and Tread = 30cm , but thickness 15cm.

I wish to reduce the thickness to 10cm . You can see my stair dimensions in attached pictures .

First and third flying have 6 x 30cm treads , and the second flying have 5 x 30cm treads.

I have the SAP2000 v24 modell .

Can someone to check the attached SAP2000 v24 modell if it's correct or not , and if can be reduced the thickness of stair to 10cm ?

I'm interested about Load Combination : 1.35 x ( Self Weight + Finish Weight ) + 1.5 x ( Live Load )

Live Load = 3kN/m2

Finish Weight = 0.5kN/m2

In attached images are screenshots from a book , and that formulas are in attached Excell spreadsheet .

I wish to check the SAP2000 modell will give me the same results that one from Excel spreadsheet ?

In Section 2-2 the stair it's sustained from side beam just 107.5cm by both of landing , because there are 180cm window also .

Can you someone help me to check the slabless stair if it can be reduced to 10cm thickness ? ( cantilevered sustain from RC wall + longitudinally sustain . Right now it's brick wall in side of Section 1-1 and 3-3 , but i can make RC wall instead of brick to sustaing the slabless stair cantilevered together with longitudinally )

For flying 1 and 3 , ( Section 1-1 and 3-3 ) i can make to have cantilever sustain also from RC wall from the side of flying.

Flying 2 ( Section 2-2) can't be made it with cantilever sustain because there it's a window.

For Section 1-1 and 3-3 i wish that all Riser to be a cantilever beam : 27cm x 10cm x 120cm

Live Load 3kN/m2 , concrete 20N/mm2 ( C25/30 concrete but with 1.5 safety factor = 20N/mm2 ) and rebar 430N/mm2 ( 500N/mm2 but with 1.15 safety factor = 430N/mm2 )

 

I wish to make the stair just like in belove link , but just 10cm thickness instead of 15cm that i have right now in my official projekt , and the longitudinally sustains to be with stirrup loops from 8mm rebars .

Cantilevered sustain from RC wall rebars will depends of what bending moments will get ( logitudinally , transversal and twisting bending moments ) - maybe 4 x 16mm in top and 4 x 10mm rebar in bottom for every tread ?

Or 2 x 12mm rebars in top + 1 x 12mm of every Riser and 2 x 12mm in bottom + 1 x 12mm of every Riser ?

 

For 10cm thickness the stirrup loops must to have 6cm width and 2 x 2cm concrete cover .

Tread stirrup = 36cm x 6cm ( 30cm tread + 10cm thickness = 40cm - 2 x 2cm concrete cover = 36cm )

Riser stirrup = 23 x 6cm ( 17cm riser + 10cm thickness = 27cm - 2 x 2cm concrete cover = 23cm )

 

I have the stair projekt in .dwg form also , so if anyone can help me , i can send them in .dwg form also .

 

Cypress – Cantilevered concrete stair - Vancouver - STUDIO-TM
https://studio-tm.com/constructionblog/?p=1754

scara.jpg

scara1.jpg

scara2.jpg

scara3.jpg

093549oydbb3znc3zeycyo.png

093550zesqrvotp82p2yze.png

87761bcb9cca520039d19c321a11f608.png

Sap2000_Modell.rar SLABLESS STAIR-1_My_Projekt-modificat_Update1.xlsx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Luk,

Thanks for explaining your question. It is interesting. I did try to look at the model but I wasn't able to load it in SAP2000.

You have a tricky situation. Without being able to look at your model, all I can say is that please do give thought to seismic considerations. If your stairs are supported on Masonry walls, attention should be paid to the connection and anchorage requirements and stability.

Good luck.

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, UmarMakhzumi said:

Hi Luk,

Thanks for explaining your question. It is interesting. I did try to look at the model but I wasn't able to load it in SAP2000.

You have a tricky situation. Without being able to look at your model, all I can say is that please do give thought to seismic considerations. If your stairs are supported on Masonry walls, attention should be paid to the connection and anchorage requirements and stability.

Good luck.

Thanks.

Please look the belove video tutorial how to open the sap2000 file in an older version of software :

Tutorial Sap2000 - Open a newer file of Sap2000 in older version
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2Do1ag5jdM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not have SAP2000 v24, but reviewed your excel file. Your design seems to be ok. I have designed/used these type of stairs in various projects, the recent one in Karachi. But always from an RCC wall. Just make sure that ring spacing provided and anchor bar length in wall is as per seismic detailing rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, G_Farooq said:

I do not have SAP2000 v24, but reviewed your excel file. Your design seems to be ok. I have designed/used these type of stairs in various projects, the recent one in Karachi. But always from an RCC wall. Just make sure that ring spacing provided and anchor bar length in wall is as per seismic detailing rules.

It can be opened Sap2000 v24 with and older version of sap2000 also .

Please look the belove video tutorial how to open the sap2000 file in an older version of software :

Tutorial Sap2000 - Open a newer file of Sap2000 in older version
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2Do1ag5jdM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • Hi there,
      I am interested in performing "Performance Based Design" for a 20 story building. 
      I'll be performing "Non-Linear Static Pushover Analysis" for my model. Until now, I have decided to go with "Displacement Co-efficient method". I will be using ETABS 2017 for performing Pushover Analysis. While assigning plastic hinges, I have an option of using ASCE 41-17 (Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing buildings". I would like to know what would be a better estimate for relative distances for plastic hinges in case of beams, columns. Any input concerning assignment of hinges to beams, columns and shear walls is highly appreciated. Normally it's taken 0.05 and 0.95 or 0.1 and 0.9. What's your opinion on this?
      Secondly, it would be great if someone can recommend me a book or some good source to understand how to characterize building using performance levels. Any sort of help is appreciated.
      I have recently graduated and joined a structural design firm, so kindly guide me, considering me a beginner.

       
      • 2 replies
    • *SEFP Consistent Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Pile Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Doc No: 10-00-CD-0007*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Date: April 16, 2018*

      1.1. FUNCTION OF JOINT

      Beam-column joint must transfer the forces, such as moment, shear and torsion, transferred by the beam to the column so that the structure can maintain its integrity to carry loads for which it is designed.

      Another function of the beam-column joint is to help the structure to dissipate seismic forces so that it can behave in a ductile manner.

      1.2.WHY DO WE CARE

      During an extreme seismic event, the code-based structure is expected to maintain its load-carrying capacity for gravity loads even after the structure deforms into inelastic range so that it does not pose any life safety hazard. Hence, the joint can go through significant degradation of strength and stiffness, and if it fails in shear, or anchorage, the life-safety objective of code cannot be achieved.

      1.3.CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE


      1.4.THINGS TO CONSIDER FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      Longitudinal bars of beams, or slab, must be able to develop their yield stress, so that the beam/slab can transfer moment to joint. It means that longitudinal bars must have adequate development length for hooked bars. This implies that the size of the column must be such that bars can develop their tensile forces. If bars can transfer moment, they can also transfer shear as far as monolithic construction is concerned.


      The shear strength of the joint must enable the transfer of moment and shear through it.



      The joint should be Constructible: Congestion of reinforcement is the main concern.

      1.5.DESIGN SHEAR FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      The design shear for beam-column joint depends upon the relative strength of beam and column at the joint.

       
      • 4 replies
    • *Comments/Observations regarding modelling in ETABS*

      *Doc No: 10-00-CD-0006*

      *Date: May 06, 2017*

      Some of the observations made during extraction of results from ETABS (v 9.7.4), for design of reinforced concrete members, are being share in this article.,

      1) Minimum Eccentricity

      ETABS always considers the minimum eccentricity for selecting the design moment of columns irrespective of the probable behavior of the column, whether short or long column. See section 10.10.6.5 and its commentary of ACI 318-08 which deals with minimum eccentricity of long columns. You should always check the design moments that ETABS uses for columns if you want to bring down the cost of construction.

      2) Unbraced/ Braced Preference

      ETABS always performs analysis of frame as if it is un-braced. You should investigate if the storey under consideration is braced, or un-braced (10.10.5.2), and decide appropriate design moments of columns.

      3) Time Period

      ETABS has a tendency to select a time period of the building that is considerably less than the value obtained by the approximate method, Method A, of the section 1630.2.2  of UBC 97. To quote the FEMA 451 document: ''Because this formula is based on lower bound regression analysis of measured building response in California, it will generally result in periods that are lower (hence, more conservative for use in predicting base shear) than those computed from a more rigorous mathematical model". So, there is no need to use the value of time period that is lot less than Ta. One should always check the time period used by the software; ETABS can overestimate the seismic force by more than 2 times.

      Visit the forum link to read the complete article.
      Link: http://www.sepakistan.com/topic/2300-commentsobservations-regarding-modelling-in-etabs/
      • 0 replies
    • The minimum amount and spacing of reinforcement to be used in structural floors, roof slabs, and walls for control of temperature and shrinkage cracking is given in ACI 318 or in ACI 350R. The minimum-reinforcement percentage, which is between 0.18 and 0.20%, does not normally control cracks to within generally acceptable design limits. To control cracks to a more acceptable level, the percentage requirement needs to exceed about 0.60% (REFRENCE ACI COMMITE REPORT 224R-01)



       

       



       

       

      So according to above statement , should we follow 0.60%, to be on more safe side??



       
      • 12 replies
    • Dear Sir/Madam,

      This email is an invitation for the participation in the First South Asia Conference on Earthquake Engineering (SACEE-2019) which will be held on 21-22 February 2019 in Karachi, Pakistan. This conference is the inaugural event in this series of conferences which has been constituted under the auspices of South Asia Earthquake Network (SHAKE). The organisers of the conference include NED University, University of Porto, University of Fuzhou, University Roma Tre and Institution of Engineers Pakistan. The conference website can be visited at http://sacee.neduet.edu.pk/.

      Please note that world leading earthquake engineering experts have confirmed their participation in the conference. These include Prof Abdelkrim Aoudia (Italy), Prof Alper Ilki (Turkey), Dr Amod Mani Dixit (Nepal), Prof Bruno Briseghella (Italy), Prof George Mylonakis (UK), Prof Khalid Mosalam (USA), Prof Humberto Varum (Portugal) and many others. The presence of these distinguished experts allows you to exchange your work/issues with them and discuss possibility of any future collaboration. Please note that participation in the conference is strictly based on registration. Early registration in different categories at reduced rates are available till 10 December 2018. Please visit the conference website to see the details and the link for registration.

      If there are any queries, please do not hesitate to contact the Conference Secretary at the following address

      Prof. Muhammad Masood Rafi
      Conference Secretary- SACEE-2019
      Chairman
      Department of Earthquake Engineering
      NED University of Engineering & Technology Karachi, Pakistan.
      Phone: 0092-21-992-261261 Ext:2605
      Email: rafi-m@neduet.edu.pk
    • What is the Minimum reinforcement For Precast Pile  according to different codes (ACI,BS)??  Pile length is 40 times of pile least dimension . 
      • 1 reply
    • Dear members, I am working on a 10 storied rcc factory building with one basement,  where floor loads are in general 125 psf(Live) . but there are 2 warehouse in the building at ground floor & 10th floor where the Live load of stacked materials are 450psf. I have modeled it and analysed in ETABS. After analysis, seeing the floor displacement for seismic load,  i am in big shock to see the pattern. the displacement pattern suddenly increased hugely & then got normal . if the warehouse load created problem, then why it effected only Ground floor level, not the 10th floor! Please tell me how can i solve it. 
      • 1 reply
    • Asalamualaikum all,

      I have columns which are conflicting with the underground water tank as shown in figure.
       

      So I have decided to make underground water tank base slab as a footing for column. So I import etabs model to safe and just take uniform water load on base slab and point load from columns.

      This is the residential house. The BC is 2tsf. But SAFE is showing tension on the base slab and the thickness from punching is 30''. I believe that thickness is too high. What can be the error? Is this approach is correct for design base slab of ugwt to carry load of two edge columns?
      • 11 replies
    • SAFE perform iterative uplift analysis,any one having experience how to check the results of this analysis???what is the purpose and scope of this analysis???
      • 15 replies
    • Shear wall design
      AOA 

      i am facing problems in shear wall design .what are the pier and spandral ?what will be the difference when we assign pier or spandral? without assigning these the shear wall design is incomplete .

      i am taking about etabsv16

      someone have document about shear wall design plz provide it 

      thank you

       
      • 13 replies
  • Tell a friend

    Love Structural Engineering Forum Of Pakistan? Tell a friend!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.