EngrJunaid

Members
  • Content count

    31
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    10

EngrJunaid last won the day on January 15

EngrJunaid had the most liked content!

About EngrJunaid

  • Rank
    Lieutenant

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Peshawar
  • University
    UET Lahore
  • Employer
    Structural Engineering Solutions
  • Interests
    Design of Structures

Recent Profile Visitors

314 profile views
  1. See the Attached self explanatory picture.
  2. @Ayesha Let me demonstrate that statement with a simple 2D frame in ETABS....
  3. Taimoor, I would recommend you to start learning Autodest Robot Structure Analysis Professional and Revit Instead of 3Ds Max.....
  4. The RC members in a physical structure crack well below the ultimate load.Therefore using full MOI of the member in idealized model is not justified. Though the use of full MOI will not affect the total value of bending (positive plus negative), the distribution b/w the members may change considerably. It is not the absolute MOI that matter,rather it is the relative stiffness of members that must be considered. In short, these modifiers (reductions in MOI) are used for the calculation of deflections i.e Serviceability checks...
  5. In order to find the TIME PERIOD,seismic weight and Base shear used by ETABS in analysis, go to DISPLAY--->Show tables and display "Auto Siesmic Loads" in the Load Definitions under Model definition.... See the attached screen shots...
  6. Dear Engineer, KPK Seismic Field Practicing Manual is attached. Field Practice Manual on basics of good construction practices.pdf Thanks.
  7. W.salaam Waqas, We have various Seismic-force resisting systems defined in different codes/standards with different nomenclature. You can study these Systems in detail in these tables; BCP SP-2007, Table 5.13-Structure Systems ASCE 41-13, Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings,Table 3-1,Common Building Types ASCE/SEI 7-10, Minimum Design Loads for buildings & other structures,Table 12.2-1 Design Coefficients and Factors for Seismic Force-Resisting Systems Modelling Structure either as BARE FRAME or FRAME with MASONRY INFILL in ETABS/SAP/STAAD PRO/ROBOT Structures/Seismostruct is the designer design approach that how he want to resist the gravity/lateral Loads. By Modelling wall in model it becomes a DUAL System (Concrete Frame with masonry shear walls) BUT the idealization of masonry walls is not as simple as other elements like Beams/columns/slabs/RC Shear walls etc. It requires more experties/understanding (Study Section 11.4-Masonry infills of ASCE 41-13,Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings for detail). Proper anchorage should be provided b/w masonry and RC frame. We mostly/commonly design our Concrete structures as BARE FRAME (Moment resisting frame without Infill walls) and assign wall load on the beams. By doing this we are neglecting the masonry walls stiffnesses which results more ductile frame (Ductility is more desirable in structures).Proper steel reinf. detailing is required and gap filled with thermopore or any other insulating material is provided b/w the RC frame and masonry wall (inorder to prevent the hammering action of masonry on RC Frame during EQ). Most of the 2,3 story houses are constructed as CONFINED MASONRY STRUCTURES and these structures perform very well in EQs.
  8. Really very nice gathering. it was my first meeting with all the members but due to our discussions on this forum for the last couple of years, I didn't even feel once for the 3-4 hours meeting that we were meeting for the first time. Thank you all....
  9. Thank you sir for such a detailed report....... i was about to ask you for this. here is a snap shot of my SAP model showing the water pressure on the Tank walls.
  10. I hope this snap shot will clear all the confusions.....
  11. AOA Dear @Rana What is the status of OStruc. I am contacting the OStruc team through info@ostruc.com but the mail is failing continuously.
  12. Stiffness Modifiers are generally applied for considering cracked section analysis in our design, so it directly affect deflections. Directly it is not affecting Moments BUT indirectly it is affecting the moments by moment redistribution.
  13. Membrane carry only in-plane stresses (f11,f22 & f12) while SHELL take both in-plane (f11,f22 & f12) & out-of-plane stresses (M11,M22 & M12). So in case of Membrane loads applied are totally transferred to the supporting beams whereas Shell have bending stiffness and therefore resist some portion of the loads by flexural deformation. Modelling area element (slabs) as a shell element with the stiffness modifiers f11=f22=f12=m11=m22=m12=0.25 (according to ACI 318 Chapter 10) will be show more realistic results than that of modelling it as Membrane with modifiers f11=f22=f12=0.25.
  14. AOA, I am getting a maximum displacement of 3 inches for a building of B+3 (total height of 52 ft) due to EQ loading in X direction. My question is that is there any code limitations/thumb rule for the lateral sway in RC buildings. ?? kindly have a look to Story displacement and story drift snap shot attached. Thanks