Jump to content
  • Welcome to SEFP!

    Welcome!

    Welcome to our community forums, full of great discussions about Structural Engineering. Please register to become a part of our thriving group or login if you are already registered.

Beam taking action of Column


Muhammad Hashmi
 Share

Recommended Posts

Assalam O Alykum

I am badly stuck in one critical beam (Cantilever) that is carrying the auditorium column of load of 530 Kilo-Newton. The beam is taking the action of column itself. I am hereby attaching bending moment diagram extracted from Etabs model ( Beam at bottom level ). Can any body help in this regard.

Column bending moment M2 is 1226 Kilo-Newton meter however beam bending moment is also same in M3 direction 1226 Kilo-Newton meter.

Column axial force 530 Kilo-Newton and Beam Axial force is also 530 Kilo-Newton.

 

Capture.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you do a breakdown to see which load case is causing this?

Normally I check the the governing load combination, then run each load case separately of the governing load combination to see what is contributing the most. If you have already done it, can you tell us which load case is causing this big axial load and then after identifying the problem we can suggest a solution. 

Is this structure steel or concrete?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assalam O Alykum

Bending moment diagram for the beam for every load combination is like a moment shape of column regardless whatever the value is, May be it is due to a Cantilever that is supporting planted column.

Whenever I release the moment value of column from the bottom side it will take proper action of beam.

May be program is reading as a frame action?

See the attached negative moment through out 

image.png.90aa1ddc5bf9b1d0b31e4b32bccafc46.pngimage.png.0c9aaabfddf5abb4256b0870a66c1c00.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First, I need to understand your question.

Is this the cantilever beam that you are talkin about. See snapshot below and confirm.

What does this statement mean - "Whenever I release the moment value of column from the bottom side it will take proper action of beam." What is proper action of beam? Does this statement mean your axial load goes away? That is why I am emphasizing that you figure out the "load case" not "load combination" which is causing this trouble and also why releasing moment is removing axial load, doesn't make sense.

Where is the axial load diagrams? Can your first please explain in detail.

 

image.png.7c2338c4c89c0d5e78a8c1f08332a174.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assalam o alykum 

Yes this is cantilever beam. 

No axial load doesnot goes away but reduced to 335 Kilo-Newton after release. Earlier I was 530 Kilo-newton load combination Dead+ Live for example.

Can see Bending moment diagram of both cases posted yesterday. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First figure is the bending moment diagram before release shape looks behave like a col. Axial load D+L = 530 Kn.

2nd figure is the bending moment diagram after release column from bottom. Axial load D+L = 335 Kn.

I don't know it's clear for team or no? 

image.png.0c9aaabfddf5abb4256b0870a66c1c00.png

Capture.JPG.2dde4a022968eed169f2af4cdd4e6933.jpeg.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/7/2021 at 2:20 AM, Muhammad Hashmi said:

Assalam O Alykum

I am badly stuck in one critical beam (Cantilever) that is carrying the auditorium column of load of 530 Kilo-Newton. The beam is taking the action of column itself. I am hereby attaching bending moment diagram extracted from Etabs model ( Beam at bottom level ). Can any body help in this regard.

Column bending moment M2 is 1226 Kilo-Newton meter however beam bending moment is also same in M3 direction 1226 Kilo-Newton meter.

Column axial force 530 Kilo-Newton and Beam Axial force is also 530 Kilo-Newton.

 

Capture.JPG

Hi What are your expectations, if the column have the load which needs to be transferred through the cantilever beam than what other load path would you expect?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/10/2021 at 5:05 PM, Muhammad Hashmi said:

Assalam O Alykum 

Muhammad you could not get the question. 

Planted column resting on the cantilever beam having load 530 Kn, but the cantilever beam shows the moment diagram like a column.

so what are you expecting, in this case? the moment on the cantilever beam and column would be same. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me break down the BM diagrams for you.

The first case: High point load  accompanied by a negligible bending moment transferred to the edge of the cantilever beam from the planted column. If we neglect the contribution of bending moment, we will get the following distribution of bending moment in each member.

image.png

If the planted column transfers huge bending moment ( and negligible point load) at the edge of the cantilever beam, following distribution will result

image.png

 

You are saying the you have assigned the hinge at the lower end of column, the end where it connects to the cantilever beam. If that's the case, you should get the BMD shown in the first figure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If there is no error in the model, then the planted column is not the major source of design forces for the cantilever. Check which load case is responsible for the transfer of sagging moment at the end of cantilever beam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Eng. Badar,

Thank you for your support. I will get back to you personally in case any clarification required.

I am personally request to you and Eng.Umar to spend their quality time at least once in a week to help others.

Thank you 

M.Omair Hashmi  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • Hi there,
      I am interested in performing "Performance Based Design" for a 20 story building. 
      I'll be performing "Non-Linear Static Pushover Analysis" for my model. Until now, I have decided to go with "Displacement Co-efficient method". I will be using ETABS 2017 for performing Pushover Analysis. While assigning plastic hinges, I have an option of using ASCE 41-17 (Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing buildings". I would like to know what would be a better estimate for relative distances for plastic hinges in case of beams, columns. Any input concerning assignment of hinges to beams, columns and shear walls is highly appreciated. Normally it's taken 0.05 and 0.95 or 0.1 and 0.9. What's your opinion on this?
      Secondly, it would be great if someone can recommend me a book or some good source to understand how to characterize building using performance levels. Any sort of help is appreciated.
      I have recently graduated and joined a structural design firm, so kindly guide me, considering me a beginner.

       
      • 2 replies
    • *SEFP Consistent Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Pile Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Doc No: 10-00-CD-0007*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Date: April 16, 2018*

      1.1. FUNCTION OF JOINT

      Beam-column joint must transfer the forces, such as moment, shear and torsion, transferred by the beam to the column so that the structure can maintain its integrity to carry loads for which it is designed.

      Another function of the beam-column joint is to help the structure to dissipate seismic forces so that it can behave in a ductile manner.

      1.2.WHY DO WE CARE

      During an extreme seismic event, the code-based structure is expected to maintain its load-carrying capacity for gravity loads even after the structure deforms into inelastic range so that it does not pose any life safety hazard. Hence, the joint can go through significant degradation of strength and stiffness, and if it fails in shear, or anchorage, the life-safety objective of code cannot be achieved.

      1.3.CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE


      1.4.THINGS TO CONSIDER FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      Longitudinal bars of beams, or slab, must be able to develop their yield stress, so that the beam/slab can transfer moment to joint. It means that longitudinal bars must have adequate development length for hooked bars. This implies that the size of the column must be such that bars can develop their tensile forces. If bars can transfer moment, they can also transfer shear as far as monolithic construction is concerned.


      The shear strength of the joint must enable the transfer of moment and shear through it.



      The joint should be Constructible: Congestion of reinforcement is the main concern.

      1.5.DESIGN SHEAR FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      The design shear for beam-column joint depends upon the relative strength of beam and column at the joint.

       
      • 4 replies
    • *Comments/Observations regarding modelling in ETABS*

      *Doc No: 10-00-CD-0006*

      *Date: May 06, 2017*

      Some of the observations made during extraction of results from ETABS (v 9.7.4), for design of reinforced concrete members, are being share in this article.,

      1) Minimum Eccentricity

      ETABS always considers the minimum eccentricity for selecting the design moment of columns irrespective of the probable behavior of the column, whether short or long column. See section 10.10.6.5 and its commentary of ACI 318-08 which deals with minimum eccentricity of long columns. You should always check the design moments that ETABS uses for columns if you want to bring down the cost of construction.

      2) Unbraced/ Braced Preference

      ETABS always performs analysis of frame as if it is un-braced. You should investigate if the storey under consideration is braced, or un-braced (10.10.5.2), and decide appropriate design moments of columns.

      3) Time Period

      ETABS has a tendency to select a time period of the building that is considerably less than the value obtained by the approximate method, Method A, of the section 1630.2.2  of UBC 97. To quote the FEMA 451 document: ''Because this formula is based on lower bound regression analysis of measured building response in California, it will generally result in periods that are lower (hence, more conservative for use in predicting base shear) than those computed from a more rigorous mathematical model". So, there is no need to use the value of time period that is lot less than Ta. One should always check the time period used by the software; ETABS can overestimate the seismic force by more than 2 times.

      Visit the forum link to read the complete article.
      Link: http://www.sepakistan.com/topic/2300-commentsobservations-regarding-modelling-in-etabs/
      • 0 replies
    • The minimum amount and spacing of reinforcement to be used in structural floors, roof slabs, and walls for control of temperature and shrinkage cracking is given in ACI 318 or in ACI 350R. The minimum-reinforcement percentage, which is between 0.18 and 0.20%, does not normally control cracks to within generally acceptable design limits. To control cracks to a more acceptable level, the percentage requirement needs to exceed about 0.60% (REFRENCE ACI COMMITE REPORT 224R-01)



       

       



       

       

      So according to above statement , should we follow 0.60%, to be on more safe side??



       
      • 12 replies
    • Dear Sir/Madam,

      This email is an invitation for the participation in the First South Asia Conference on Earthquake Engineering (SACEE-2019) which will be held on 21-22 February 2019 in Karachi, Pakistan. This conference is the inaugural event in this series of conferences which has been constituted under the auspices of South Asia Earthquake Network (SHAKE). The organisers of the conference include NED University, University of Porto, University of Fuzhou, University Roma Tre and Institution of Engineers Pakistan. The conference website can be visited at http://sacee.neduet.edu.pk/.

      Please note that world leading earthquake engineering experts have confirmed their participation in the conference. These include Prof Abdelkrim Aoudia (Italy), Prof Alper Ilki (Turkey), Dr Amod Mani Dixit (Nepal), Prof Bruno Briseghella (Italy), Prof George Mylonakis (UK), Prof Khalid Mosalam (USA), Prof Humberto Varum (Portugal) and many others. The presence of these distinguished experts allows you to exchange your work/issues with them and discuss possibility of any future collaboration. Please note that participation in the conference is strictly based on registration. Early registration in different categories at reduced rates are available till 10 December 2018. Please visit the conference website to see the details and the link for registration.

      If there are any queries, please do not hesitate to contact the Conference Secretary at the following address

      Prof. Muhammad Masood Rafi
      Conference Secretary- SACEE-2019
      Chairman
      Department of Earthquake Engineering
      NED University of Engineering & Technology Karachi, Pakistan.
      Phone: 0092-21-992-261261 Ext:2605
      Email: rafi-m@neduet.edu.pk
    • What is the Minimum reinforcement For Precast Pile  according to different codes (ACI,BS)??  Pile length is 40 times of pile least dimension . 
      • 1 reply
    • Dear members, I am working on a 10 storied rcc factory building with one basement,  where floor loads are in general 125 psf(Live) . but there are 2 warehouse in the building at ground floor & 10th floor where the Live load of stacked materials are 450psf. I have modeled it and analysed in ETABS. After analysis, seeing the floor displacement for seismic load,  i am in big shock to see the pattern. the displacement pattern suddenly increased hugely & then got normal . if the warehouse load created problem, then why it effected only Ground floor level, not the 10th floor! Please tell me how can i solve it. 
      • 1 reply
    • Asalamualaikum all,

      I have columns which are conflicting with the underground water tank as shown in figure.
       

      So I have decided to make underground water tank base slab as a footing for column. So I import etabs model to safe and just take uniform water load on base slab and point load from columns.

      This is the residential house. The BC is 2tsf. But SAFE is showing tension on the base slab and the thickness from punching is 30''. I believe that thickness is too high. What can be the error? Is this approach is correct for design base slab of ugwt to carry load of two edge columns?
      • 11 replies
    • SAFE perform iterative uplift analysis,any one having experience how to check the results of this analysis???what is the purpose and scope of this analysis???
      • 15 replies
    • Shear wall design
      AOA 

      i am facing problems in shear wall design .what are the pier and spandral ?what will be the difference when we assign pier or spandral? without assigning these the shear wall design is incomplete .

      i am taking about etabsv16

      someone have document about shear wall design plz provide it 

      thank you

       
      • 13 replies
  • Tell a friend

    Love Structural Engineering Forum Of Pakistan? Tell a friend!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.