Jump to content
  • Welcome to SEFP!

    Welcome!

    Welcome to our community forums, full of great discussions about Structural Engineering. Please register to become a part of our thriving group or login if you are already registered.

Connection between wall and slab of ground floor


Kirill
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone from Russia!

I'm in the process of building a house. This autumn I did a basement slab (floor) and walls of house and now the time has come for the first (ground) floor. For now, I have situation shown on the pictures. The drawings of basement and walls are also attached. On the drawing you can see basement walls, residual reinforcement and future slab (all reinforcement of walls are not shown). So, I have a question. What should I do with residual reinforcement? According to Russian standarts and designers books I should bend them and connect with the main bars of slab reinforcement or cut them out. But how should I bend them? I mean, what length should be? How they should be connected to main bars? The problem is that I can't find single solution for this problem, moreover I can't understand which one is better and why it's good solution. Unfortunately Russian designers in this case just say: "It doesn't matter which one you will use. They are the same" or "I would use this one because...because...I like it"😁

I am really intrested what will you do with this reinforccement. I attached some ideas, I hope my problem will be clear for you😀
P.S If It's possible, send me maybe some typical projects or drawings and proofes why your or my solution the best.
P.P.S If you have any other qustions according to my project I am ready to discuss them with you.

Best regards,
Kirill

1.jpg

Армирование.jpg

Армирование_2.jpg

2.jpg

3.png

Армирование_3.jpg

Армирование_4.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Kirill said:

But how should I bend them? I mean, what length should be?

You should bend them and the length should be equal to development length of a hook. Below is the concept:

 

image.png.0fad635f5ea33097eda2f78580e207e7.png

Normally, the width of wall should be kept enough wide that you are able to achieve the ldh length and from the face of the wall you need to extend the rebar a distance of ld. You can find the values of Ldh also called development length of hooked bar and ld - development length of straight bar in your Russian code. For US Code, you can use this link:

https://structuralcalc.com/rebar-development-length-calculator-to-aci-318/

 

3 hours ago, Kirill said:

How they should be connected to main bars?

If you extend your wall bars a distance of Ld from the face of the wall, you need to just place the slab/ beam bars to the end as your wall reinforcement which is bent will take of of flexural moment at end of slab. No need to connect or anything.. Just extend your slab bar to the end of wall horizontally using a straight bar.

3 hours ago, Kirill said:

Unfortunately Russian designers in this case just say: "It doesn't matter which one you will use.

This can also be correct because in houses the loads are small and if you aren't in seismic zone, and the design is over-reinforced the development lengths can be reduced. Also, not bending the wall reinforcement into slab means that your slab will have more positive moment. Nothing is wrong with this approach.

 

Edited by Ayesha
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know whether I am understanding your question correctly.  

Extend the vertical rebars of retaining wall up to the development length inside the reinforced concrete slab.

In that case retaining wall design is somehow taking the action of fixed connection from the slab and from the foundation as well that will reduce the bending moment and crack width value of retaining wall itself. 

Second don't allow the contractor to place the backfill around the retaining wall unless you cast the slab.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Muhammad Hashmi said:

I don't know whether I am understanding your question correctly.  

Extend the vertical rebars of retaining wall up to the development length inside the reinforced concrete slab.

In that case retaining wall design is somehow taking the action of fixed connection from the slab and from the foundation as well that will reduce the bending moment and crack width value of retaining wall itself. 

I suppose you understood me in a correct way. 
I want to create connection between wall and slab, as you wrote in the third sentence.
But I can't understand how to bend existing rebars (you can see them on the picture above), because there are different ways how to do that. 

1 hour ago, Muhammad Hashmi said:

Second don't allow the contractor to place the backfill around the retaining wall unless you cast the slab.

Yeah! Of course, I will not allow to do that!
First of all I should finish with ground slab and necessary communications, then should be installed waterproofing and thermal insulation of basement walls. Only after that I will provide backfill. So...It's not very close event😀

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Badar (BAZ) said:

As  I understand, you want to know what to do with residual rebars of basement walls. This is what I have to say about it:

27012022130336-0001.jpg

Thanks a lot for your type of reinforcement!
Unfortunately, I didn't get your P.S

First P.S.

Could you explain what does negative rebars mean? Where should it be located? Could you add example on your drawing? 

Second P.S.

Did I get your idea correctly? You said that if have length of span more than 4m I should do something else with residual rebars? I have span more than 4m, so could you also draw what do you mean?

Also I have another question, I don't know if I should create another thopic. I attached drawing of house basement. With stars I marked a place with a large span. One side is min 4890mm, another one is 8690mm. Main bars will be located along short span (I suppose you will agree). Bars are 12mm, step 200mm. The planned thickness of the slab is 200mm. Should be installed additional supporting or will the walls indicated in the drawing be enough? If there are similar projects with large spans or calculations, I would be very grateful

Армирование_5.jpg

5.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Negative rebars are the ones near the top of slab. With respect to my figure, it is the wall-rebar bent into the slab near its top face.
  • It is a widely accepted practice to extend the top (negative) rebars to a distance of about span/4 from the face of support. For a 4m span, this would mean that you require 1m. But, as per your drawings, you do not have 1m; the available length of residual bars from the face of wall is about 1200 -150-300= 750. So you need extra rebars as per the detail shown in the comments of Ayesha for those spans.

PS: In RCC structures there is no one-fits-all solutions. There are multiple loads paths. Even if you do not provide the lengths mentioned above, the slab can still have the required strength if you have provided extra reinforcement in the mid-span (i.e bottom bars).

The difference will be that you might get wider cracks (on top near slab to wall connection) if you do not follow the detail suggested in my comments.

But, you may not get to see them ever as flooring on the slab will make them invisible. This is the reason many engineers and contractors will say to you that do not worry about top rebars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/28/2022 at 6:43 AM, Badar (BAZ) said:

Negative rebars are the ones near the top of slab. With respect to my figure, it is the wall-rebar bent into the slab near its top face.

Thanks! I didn't know that they are called negative rebars. 

On 1/28/2022 at 6:43 AM, Badar (BAZ) said:

It is a widely accepted practice to extend the top (negative) rebars to a distance of about span/4 from the face of support. For a 4m span, this would mean that you require 1m. But, as per your drawings, you do not have 1m; the available length of residual bars from the face of wall is about 1200 -150-300= 750. So you need extra rebars as per the detail shown in the comments of Ayesha for those spans.

Ok! I got it! But, Unfortunately, I can't agree with your calculations. We have total length equals to 1200mm. Required length of rebar according to math in place with radius: L=2*pi*r (length of circule) / 4 = 2*3.14*r (5*diameter of bar (12)) / 4 = 94.2. Plus 115 taking into account the protective layer. Total is 210 mm, 1200 - 210 = 990 mm. So we have 990 mm of bar! However, this is also not enough🙃. So, I need extra bars according to your recommendations. But It's only about "stars" area, am I right? 

Also I add drawing from my designer. Orange line - residual bar. So, Now, I can see that it's very short. 

What should I do with residual bars in places where spans<4. Should I cut them? Is it possible to leave them everywhere not cut off?

On 1/28/2022 at 6:43 AM, Badar (BAZ) said:

PS: In RCC structures there is no one-fits-all solutions.

Unfortunately, I already understood it😒. I just want to get good solution, to be sure in my project. I just want to build house and forget about this forever. Not thinking will my slab crack or not.
The most awful thing that  my designers just create drawings and when I ask them: "Why did you do that" They are answering: "I always do this". I hope you are understanding my idea.

On 1/28/2022 at 6:43 AM, Badar (BAZ) said:

The difference will be that you might get wider cracks (on top near slab to wall connection) if you do not follow the detail suggested in my comments.

I don't need them at all!😀

On 1/28/2022 at 6:43 AM, Badar (BAZ) said:

But, you may not get to see them ever as flooring on the slab will make them invisible. This is the reason many engineers and contractors will say to you that do not worry about top rebars.

You are saying terrible things! But you are right...In my case engineers and contractors are not responsible for anything

On 1/28/2022 at 6:43 AM, Badar (BAZ) said:

Even if you do not provide the lengths mentioned above, the slab can still have the required strength if you have provided extra reinforcement in the mid-span (i.e bottom bars).

Yeah, of course! There will be bottom bars (main and non main) and upper bars (main and non main).

6.png

7.png

Edited by Kirill
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Kirill said:

Plus 115 taking into account the protective layer. Total is 210 mm, 1200 - 210 = 990 mm. So we have 990 mm

It appears that you have misunderstood the point about available length of residual bar  that can serve the demand of negative moment. You do not have 990mm.

 

 

30012022153511-0001.jpg

11 hours ago, Kirill said:

What should I do with residual bars in places where spans<4. Should I cut them? Is it possible to leave them everywhere not cut off?

I have already addressed that: You can provide extra rebars as per details shown by Ayesha.

 

11 hours ago, Kirill said:

You are saying terrible things!

It is what it is!

 

11 hours ago, Kirill said:

I don't need them at all!😀

You cannot avoid them. What you can do is to limit their width so that the structure can have an longer service  life, and the rebars remain corrosion free.

11 hours ago, Kirill said:

There will be bottom bars (main and non main) and upper bars (main and non main).

I hope you understand that main/non-main depends on whether there is one-way or two-way action.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Hello everyone! The working season almost ends. Time to sum up!

For new readers:
The task was to create a concrete slab for basement floor of 12x15m house in Russia. At the beginning of season we just had basement walls and bar releases (see attached photoes at the beginning). 

During summer the floor slab was filled in, waterprofing and thermal insulation of basement walls were finished

Now, It is the good opportunity to show obtained results. Maybe someone will find something them interesting. I would not say that we completely followed by advices from this forum, but still, all suggestions were considered. Thanks everyone who answered, espesially big thanks for Badar!

There is video how we bend bars. We did a "special" machine for this operation :)

Grid pitch (step) is 200 mm in some places it is only 100 mm

Slab height is 210 mm

I wrote everything briefly, but if there are questions, I can add
!

photo_2022-10-18_11-51-15.jpg

photo_2022-10-18_11-51-16 (2).jpg

photo_2022-10-18_11-51-16 (3).jpg

photo_2022-10-18_11-51-15 (3).jpg

photo_2022-10-18_11-51-16 (4).jpg

photo_2022-10-18_11-51-16.jpg

photo_2022-10-18_11-51-15 (2).jpg

photo_2022-10-18_12-18-16.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • Hi there,
      I am interested in performing "Performance Based Design" for a 20 story building. 
      I'll be performing "Non-Linear Static Pushover Analysis" for my model. Until now, I have decided to go with "Displacement Co-efficient method". I will be using ETABS 2017 for performing Pushover Analysis. While assigning plastic hinges, I have an option of using ASCE 41-17 (Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing buildings". I would like to know what would be a better estimate for relative distances for plastic hinges in case of beams, columns. Any input concerning assignment of hinges to beams, columns and shear walls is highly appreciated. Normally it's taken 0.05 and 0.95 or 0.1 and 0.9. What's your opinion on this?
      Secondly, it would be great if someone can recommend me a book or some good source to understand how to characterize building using performance levels. Any sort of help is appreciated.
      I have recently graduated and joined a structural design firm, so kindly guide me, considering me a beginner.

       
      • 2 replies
    • *SEFP Consistent Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Pile Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Doc No: 10-00-CD-0007*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Date: April 16, 2018*

      1.1. FUNCTION OF JOINT

      Beam-column joint must transfer the forces, such as moment, shear and torsion, transferred by the beam to the column so that the structure can maintain its integrity to carry loads for which it is designed.

      Another function of the beam-column joint is to help the structure to dissipate seismic forces so that it can behave in a ductile manner.

      1.2.WHY DO WE CARE

      During an extreme seismic event, the code-based structure is expected to maintain its load-carrying capacity for gravity loads even after the structure deforms into inelastic range so that it does not pose any life safety hazard. Hence, the joint can go through significant degradation of strength and stiffness, and if it fails in shear, or anchorage, the life-safety objective of code cannot be achieved.

      1.3.CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE


      1.4.THINGS TO CONSIDER FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      Longitudinal bars of beams, or slab, must be able to develop their yield stress, so that the beam/slab can transfer moment to joint. It means that longitudinal bars must have adequate development length for hooked bars. This implies that the size of the column must be such that bars can develop their tensile forces. If bars can transfer moment, they can also transfer shear as far as monolithic construction is concerned.


      The shear strength of the joint must enable the transfer of moment and shear through it.



      The joint should be Constructible: Congestion of reinforcement is the main concern.

      1.5.DESIGN SHEAR FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      The design shear for beam-column joint depends upon the relative strength of beam and column at the joint.

       
      • 4 replies
    • *Comments/Observations regarding modelling in ETABS*

      *Doc No: 10-00-CD-0006*

      *Date: May 06, 2017*

      Some of the observations made during extraction of results from ETABS (v 9.7.4), for design of reinforced concrete members, are being share in this article.,

      1) Minimum Eccentricity

      ETABS always considers the minimum eccentricity for selecting the design moment of columns irrespective of the probable behavior of the column, whether short or long column. See section 10.10.6.5 and its commentary of ACI 318-08 which deals with minimum eccentricity of long columns. You should always check the design moments that ETABS uses for columns if you want to bring down the cost of construction.

      2) Unbraced/ Braced Preference

      ETABS always performs analysis of frame as if it is un-braced. You should investigate if the storey under consideration is braced, or un-braced (10.10.5.2), and decide appropriate design moments of columns.

      3) Time Period

      ETABS has a tendency to select a time period of the building that is considerably less than the value obtained by the approximate method, Method A, of the section 1630.2.2  of UBC 97. To quote the FEMA 451 document: ''Because this formula is based on lower bound regression analysis of measured building response in California, it will generally result in periods that are lower (hence, more conservative for use in predicting base shear) than those computed from a more rigorous mathematical model". So, there is no need to use the value of time period that is lot less than Ta. One should always check the time period used by the software; ETABS can overestimate the seismic force by more than 2 times.

      Visit the forum link to read the complete article.
      Link: http://www.sepakistan.com/topic/2300-commentsobservations-regarding-modelling-in-etabs/
      • 0 replies
    • The minimum amount and spacing of reinforcement to be used in structural floors, roof slabs, and walls for control of temperature and shrinkage cracking is given in ACI 318 or in ACI 350R. The minimum-reinforcement percentage, which is between 0.18 and 0.20%, does not normally control cracks to within generally acceptable design limits. To control cracks to a more acceptable level, the percentage requirement needs to exceed about 0.60% (REFRENCE ACI COMMITE REPORT 224R-01)



       

       



       

       

      So according to above statement , should we follow 0.60%, to be on more safe side??



       
      • 12 replies
    • Dear Sir/Madam,

      This email is an invitation for the participation in the First South Asia Conference on Earthquake Engineering (SACEE-2019) which will be held on 21-22 February 2019 in Karachi, Pakistan. This conference is the inaugural event in this series of conferences which has been constituted under the auspices of South Asia Earthquake Network (SHAKE). The organisers of the conference include NED University, University of Porto, University of Fuzhou, University Roma Tre and Institution of Engineers Pakistan. The conference website can be visited at http://sacee.neduet.edu.pk/.

      Please note that world leading earthquake engineering experts have confirmed their participation in the conference. These include Prof Abdelkrim Aoudia (Italy), Prof Alper Ilki (Turkey), Dr Amod Mani Dixit (Nepal), Prof Bruno Briseghella (Italy), Prof George Mylonakis (UK), Prof Khalid Mosalam (USA), Prof Humberto Varum (Portugal) and many others. The presence of these distinguished experts allows you to exchange your work/issues with them and discuss possibility of any future collaboration. Please note that participation in the conference is strictly based on registration. Early registration in different categories at reduced rates are available till 10 December 2018. Please visit the conference website to see the details and the link for registration.

      If there are any queries, please do not hesitate to contact the Conference Secretary at the following address

      Prof. Muhammad Masood Rafi
      Conference Secretary- SACEE-2019
      Chairman
      Department of Earthquake Engineering
      NED University of Engineering & Technology Karachi, Pakistan.
      Phone: 0092-21-992-261261 Ext:2605
      Email: rafi-m@neduet.edu.pk
    • What is the Minimum reinforcement For Precast Pile  according to different codes (ACI,BS)??  Pile length is 40 times of pile least dimension . 
      • 1 reply
    • Dear members, I am working on a 10 storied rcc factory building with one basement,  where floor loads are in general 125 psf(Live) . but there are 2 warehouse in the building at ground floor & 10th floor where the Live load of stacked materials are 450psf. I have modeled it and analysed in ETABS. After analysis, seeing the floor displacement for seismic load,  i am in big shock to see the pattern. the displacement pattern suddenly increased hugely & then got normal . if the warehouse load created problem, then why it effected only Ground floor level, not the 10th floor! Please tell me how can i solve it. 
      • 1 reply
    • Asalamualaikum all,

      I have columns which are conflicting with the underground water tank as shown in figure.
       

      So I have decided to make underground water tank base slab as a footing for column. So I import etabs model to safe and just take uniform water load on base slab and point load from columns.

      This is the residential house. The BC is 2tsf. But SAFE is showing tension on the base slab and the thickness from punching is 30''. I believe that thickness is too high. What can be the error? Is this approach is correct for design base slab of ugwt to carry load of two edge columns?
      • 11 replies
    • SAFE perform iterative uplift analysis,any one having experience how to check the results of this analysis???what is the purpose and scope of this analysis???
      • 15 replies
    • Shear wall design
      AOA 

      i am facing problems in shear wall design .what are the pier and spandral ?what will be the difference when we assign pier or spandral? without assigning these the shear wall design is incomplete .

      i am taking about etabsv16

      someone have document about shear wall design plz provide it 

      thank you

       
      • 13 replies
  • Tell a friend

    Love Structural Engineering Forum Of Pakistan? Tell a friend!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.